Roboflow

Best OCR Models

Compare the best 97 OCR models and try 92 of them on your own images, free in the Roboflow Playground. 36 are open-weight, so you can self-host them for free under their licenses.

97 models · 36 open-weight · 92 free to try · prices synced Oct 27, 2026

Best OCR Models 2026

Gemini 4 Argon scores 85.7% on Roboflow's Vision Evals OCR benchmark (low effort, 49 models, preliminary single run), ahead of GPT-6.1 Terra at 81.9%. Updated Oct 26, 2026. See the full ranking.

Open-Source OCR Models

36 models with downloadable weights you can self-host under their licenses (Custom, MIT, and Apache 2.0). 31 run live in the Playground through hosted APIs, so self-hosting is optional.

Actions
MetaNEW
816B total / 42B activeCustomOct 2026
Try
Mistral
1.05T total, 49B activeCustomOct 2026
Try
309B total, 15B activeMITSep 2026
Try
1.02T total, 42B activeMITSep 2026
Try
320B total, 18B activeMITAug 2026
Try
Qwen
27.78BApache 2.0Aug 2026
Try
29.6BApache 2.0Aug 2026
Try
MoonshotAI
Kimi K3Moonshot AI
2.8TModified MITJul 2026
Try

OCR Models via API

61 proprietary models where the weights aren't downloadable: access is through each provider's API and billed by them. Try all of them free in the Playground.

Actions
OpenAINEW
$1.00$5.001.1MOct 2026
Try
GoogleNEW
$2.00$10.001MOct 2026
Try
Meta
$4.00$20.001.0MOct 2026
Try
Anthropic
$0.10$0.501MOct 2026
Try
OpenAI
$2.00$10.001.1MSep 2026
Try
Anthropic
$2.00$10.001MSep 2026
Try
Anthropic
$4.00$20.001MSep 2026
Try
OpenAI
$0.10$0.501.1MSep 2026
Try

How to Choose an OCR Model

The right OCR model depends on what your documents look like and what you need back: raw text, structured fields, or answers. Clean printed pages, handwritten forms, and dense multi-column tables are different problems, and the models on this page split into two families that handle them differently.

Purpose-built OCR systems, from classic engines to OCR-tuned models like GLM-OCR, are optimized for one job: reading text accurately and cheaply at volume. They tend to win on cost per page, throughput, and consistency for well-understood document types, and specialist models increasingly handle tables, formulas, and layout structure that used to require separate systems.

Choose this family when you process documents at scale (invoices, receipts, archives), the format is broadly predictable, and cost per page matters more than open-ended flexibility.

Frontier VLMs read text as one part of understanding the whole page: they can transcribe, then also summarize, answer questions, or return the content already structured as JSON or markdown from a single prompt. That flexibility comes at a higher price per page and more latency, and on straightforward transcription a dedicated engine is usually cheaper for the same accuracy.

Choose a VLM when the extraction is complicated (mixed layouts, judgment calls, follow-up questions), when you want structured output without building a parsing pipeline, or when volumes are small enough that flexibility beats unit cost.

Teams processing documents at scale often route pages: a fast, cheap OCR model handles the bulk, and hard pages (poor scans, handwriting, unusual layouts) escalate to a stronger VLM. Confidence scores or simple heuristics decide the split, keeping average cost low without giving up accuracy on the tail.

The bottom line: High volume and predictable documents point to a dedicated OCR model; complex extraction and structured output point to a VLM. At scale, route easy pages cheap and escalate the hard ones.

Frequently Asked Questions About OCR Models

On Roboflow's Vision Evals OCR benchmark (49 models tested, updated Oct 26, 2026), Gemini 4 Argon by Google currently scores highest at 85.7%. The full ranking is on our evals page. For fixed categories in production, a model fine-tuned on your own data still often wins.

Yes. 36 of the 97 OCR models here are open-weight (for example Muse Spark Open, Muse Glimmer 30B, and Kimi K3), free to self-host under their licenses (Custom, MIT, and Apache 2.0).

Yes. You can run 92 of them in the Roboflow Playground for free. Upload an image and compare the models' output side by side, no setup required.

Explore other vision task pages, compare models head to head, or browse the full model catalog.