Compare the best 97 OCR models and try 90 of them on your own images, free in the Roboflow Playground. 36 are open-weight, so you can self-host them for free under their licenses.
97 models · 36 open-weight · 90 free to try · prices synced Oct 27, 2026
Gemini 4 Argon scores 85.7% on Roboflow's Vision Evals OCR benchmark (low effort, 49 models, preliminary single run), ahead of GPT-6.1 Terra at 81.9%. Updated Oct 26, 2026. See the full ranking.
Benchmark Leader
Gemini 4 Argon
Highest score on Roboflow's Vision Evals OCR benchmark, 49 vision language models tested
Open-Weight Leader
Muse Spark Open
Best score among the open-weight models, #19 of 49 overall on Roboflow's Vision Evals OCR benchmark
Fastest on Benchmark
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Quickest within 15 points of the leader in Roboflow's Vision Evals OCR benchmark runs: 5.6s per request on average, scoring 73.9%
Lowest Measured Cost
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Cheapest within 15 points of the leader in Roboflow's Vision Evals OCR benchmark runs: $0.0032 per request as measured, not list price, scoring 73.9%
36 models with downloadable weights you can self-host under their licenses (Custom, MIT, and Apache 2.0). 30 run live in the Playground through hosted APIs, so self-hosting is optional.
| Actions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Muse Spark OpenMeta NEW | 816B total / 42B active | Custom | Oct 2026 | |
Mistral Large 4Mistral | 1.05T total, 49B active | Custom | Oct 2026 | |
MiMo V2.6 FlashXiaomi | 309B total, 15B active | MIT | Sep 2026 | |
MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomi | 1.02T total, 42B active | MIT | Sep 2026 | |
GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai | 320B total, 18B active | MIT | Aug 2026 | |
Qwen3.8 27BQwen | 27.78B | Apache 2.0 | Aug 2026 | |
Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | 29.6B | Apache 2.0 | Aug 2026 | |
Kimi K3Moonshot AI | 2.8T | Modified MIT | Jul 2026 | |
Gemma 4 12BGoogle | 12B | Apache 2.0 | Jun 2026 | |
Qwen3.6 27BQwen | 27B | Apache 2.0 | Apr 2026 | |
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen | 35B total, 3B active | Apache 2.0 | Apr 2026 | |
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle | 25.2B | Apache 2.0 | Apr 2026 | |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle | 31B | Apache 2.0 | Apr 2026 | |
GLM-OCRZ.ai | 0.9B | MIT | Mar 2026 | |
Qwen3.5 9bQwen | 9B | Apache 2.0 | Mar 2026 | |
| 122B | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2026 | ||
Qwen3.5 35B A3BQwen | 35B | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2026 | |
Qwen3.5-27BQwen | 27B | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2026 | |
| 397B | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2026 | ||
Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI | 1T | Modified MIT | Jan 2026 | |
| 8.8B | Apache 2.0 | Oct 2025 | ||
| 31B | Apache 2.0 | Oct 2025 | ||
| 235B | Apache 2.0 | Sep 2025 | ||
Florence-2Microsoft | 230M | MIT | Jun 2025 | |
Llama 4 MaverickMeta | 400B | Custom | Apr 2025 | |
Llama 4 ScoutMeta | 109B | Custom | Apr 2025 | |
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral | 24B | Apache 2.0 | Mar 2025 | |
Gemma 3 12BGoogle | 12B | Custom | Mar 2025 | |
Gemma 3 27BGoogle | — | Custom | Mar 2025 | |
Gemma 3 4BGoogle | 4B | Custom | Mar 2025 | |
| 7B | Apache 2.0 | Jan 2025 | ||
PaliGemma 2Google | 3B, 10B, 28B | Custom | Dec 2024 | |
Pixtral 12BMistral | 12B | Apache 2.0 | Sep 2024 | |
SuryaMindee | — | GPL v3 | Jan 2024 | |
TrOCRMicrosoft | 61.4M-600M | MIT | Sep 2021 | |
docTRMindee | — | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2021 |
61 proprietary models where the weights aren't downloadable: access is through each provider's API and billed by them. Try 60 of them free in the Playground.
| Actions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI NEW | $1.00 | $5.00 | 1.1M | Oct 2026 | |
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle NEW | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1M | Oct 2026 | |
Muse WonderMeta | $4.00 | $20.00 | 1.0M | Oct 2026 | |
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic | $0.10 | $0.50 | 1M | Oct 2026 | |
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1.1M | Sep 2026 | |
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1M | Sep 2026 | |
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic | $4.00 | $20.00 | 1M | Sep 2026 | |
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI | $0.10 | $0.50 | 1.1M | Sep 2026 | |
GPT-6 SolOpenAI | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1.1M | Sep 2026 | |
Grok 4.7SpaceXAI | $2.00 | $6.00 | 500K | Sep 2026 | |
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1.1M | Sep 2026 | |
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle | $0.83 | $4.13 | 1.0M | Sep 2026 | |
Muse Spark 1.3Meta | $1.25 | $4.25 | 1.0M | Sep 2026 | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1M | Sep 2026 | |
Qwen3.8 FlashQwen | $0.15 | $0.47 | 1M | Aug 2026 | |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle | $0.75 | $3.75 | 1.0M | Aug 2026 | |
Grok 4.6SpaceXAI | $2.00 | $6.00 | 500K | Aug 2026 | |
Muse Spark 1.2Meta | $1.25 | $4.25 | 1.0M | Aug 2026 | |
Qwen3.8 MaxQwen | — | — | 984K | Aug 2026 | |
Qwen3.7 FlashQwen | $0.030 | $0.13 | 1M | Jul 2026 | |
Claude Opus 5Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M | Jul 2026 | |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle | $0.30 | $2.50 | 1.0M | Jul 2026 | |
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle | $0.75 | $3.75 | 1M | Jul 2026 | |
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI | $0.20 | $1.20 | 1.5M | Jul 2026 | |
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | $4.00 | $20.00 | 1.5M | Jul 2026 | |
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI | $2.00 | $12.00 | 1.1M | Jul 2026 | |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | $1.25 | $4.25 | 1.0M | Jul 2026 | |
Grok 4.5SpaceXAI | $2.00 | $6.00 | 500K | Jul 2026 | |
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1M | Jun 2026 | |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1M | Jun 2026 | |
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen | $0.32 | $1.28 | — | Jun 2026 | |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M | May 2026 | |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle | $1.50 | $9.00 | 1.0M | May 2026 | |
GPT-5.5OpenAI | $5.00 | $30.00 | 1M | Apr 2026 | |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M | Apr 2026 | |
Qwen3.6 FlashQwen | $0.19 | $1.13 | 1M | Apr 2026 | |
Qwen3.6 PlusQwen | $0.33 | $1.95 | 1M | Apr 2026 | |
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai | $1.20 | $4.00 | 200K | Apr 2026 | |
GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI | $0.75 | $4.50 | 400K | Mar 2026 | |
GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI | $0.20 | $1.25 | 400K | Mar 2026 | |
GPT-5.4OpenAI | $2.50 | $15.00 | 1.1M | Mar 2026 | |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle | $0.25 | $1.50 | 1M | Mar 2026 | |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle | $2.00 | $12.00 | 1M | Feb 2026 | |
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic | $3.00 | $15.00 | 1M | Feb 2026 | |
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M | Feb 2026 | |
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle | $0.50 | $3.00 | 1M | Dec 2025 | |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | $1.75 | $14.00 | 400K | Dec 2025 | |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 200K | Nov 2025 | |
GPT-5.1OpenAI | $1.25 | $10.00 | 196K | Nov 2025 | |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | $1.00 | $5.00 | 200K | Oct 2025 | |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K | Sep 2025 | |
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral | $0.40 | $2.00 | 128K | Aug 2025 | |
GPT-5OpenAI | $1.25 | $10.00 | — | Aug 2025 | |
GPT-5 MiniOpenAI | $0.25 | $2.00 | 400K | Aug 2025 | |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | $0.050 | $0.40 | 400K | Aug 2025 | |
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle | $0.10 | $0.40 | 1M | Jul 2025 | |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle | $0.30 | $2.50 | 1M | Jul 2025 | |
Grok 4SpaceXAI | — | — | — | Jul 2025 | |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle | $1.25 | $10.00 | 1M | Jun 2025 | |
Qwen VL MaxQwen | — | — | — | Feb 2025 | |
Google Vision OCRGoogle | — | — | — | Feb 2016 |
The right OCR model depends on what your documents look like and what you need back: raw text, structured fields, or answers. Clean printed pages, handwritten forms, and dense multi-column tables are different problems, and the models on this page split into two families that handle them differently.
Purpose-built OCR systems, from classic engines to OCR-tuned models like GLM-OCR, are optimized for one job: reading text accurately and cheaply at volume. They tend to win on cost per page, throughput, and consistency for well-understood document types, and specialist models increasingly handle tables, formulas, and layout structure that used to require separate systems.
Choose this family when you process documents at scale (invoices, receipts, archives), the format is broadly predictable, and cost per page matters more than open-ended flexibility.
Frontier VLMs read text as one part of understanding the whole page: they can transcribe, then also summarize, answer questions, or return the content already structured as JSON or markdown from a single prompt. That flexibility comes at a higher price per page and more latency, and on straightforward transcription a dedicated engine is usually cheaper for the same accuracy.
Choose a VLM when the extraction is complicated (mixed layouts, judgment calls, follow-up questions), when you want structured output without building a parsing pipeline, or when volumes are small enough that flexibility beats unit cost.
Teams processing documents at scale often route pages: a fast, cheap OCR model handles the bulk, and hard pages (poor scans, handwriting, unusual layouts) escalate to a stronger VLM. Confidence scores or simple heuristics decide the split, keeping average cost low without giving up accuracy on the tail.
The bottom line: High volume and predictable documents point to a dedicated OCR model; complex extraction and structured output point to a VLM. At scale, route easy pages cheap and escalate the hard ones.
On Roboflow's Vision Evals OCR benchmark (49 models tested, updated Oct 26, 2026), Gemini 4 Argon by Google currently scores highest at 85.7%. The full ranking is on our evals page. For fixed categories in production, a model fine-tuned on your own data still often wins.
Yes. 36 of the 97 OCR models here are open-weight (for example Muse Spark Open, Muse Glimmer 30B, and Kimi K3), free to self-host under their licenses (Custom, MIT, and Apache 2.0).
Yes. You can run 90 of them in the Roboflow Playground for free. Upload an image and compare the models' output side by side, no setup required.
Explore other vision task pages, compare models head to head, or browse the full model catalog.