Qwen3.6-27B is a dense 27-billion-parameter multimodal language model developed by Alibaba's Qwen team and released on April 22, 2026. It combines a causal language model with an integrated vision encoder, supporting text, image, and video inputs natively. The architecture employs a hybrid attention design that interleaves Gated DeltaNet linear attention blocks with standard Gated Attention layers across 64 transformer layers with a hidden dimension of 5,120. Unlike Mixture-of-Experts variants in the Qwen3.6 family, all 27 billion parameters are active on every inference pass, simplifying deployment and quantization. The model supports a native context window of 262,144 tokens, extensible to approximately 1,010,000 tokens via YaRN scaling. It is released under the Apache 2.0 license with open weights available on Hugging Face and ModelScope.
The model introduces two notable capabilities relative to prior Qwen releases: enhanced agentic coding support covering frontend workflows and repository-level reasoning, and a Thinking Preservation mechanism that retains chain-of-thought reasoning context across multi-turn conversation history to reduce redundant token generation in iterative agent sessions. It supports both a thinking mode for multi-step reasoning and a non-thinking mode for faster responses within a single model. On coding benchmarks, Qwen reports scores of 77.2 on SWE-bench Verified, 59.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.0, and 48.2 on SkillsBench. Vision capabilities include chart understanding (CharXiv RQ: 78.4), OCR (CC-OCR: 81.2), and video understanding (VideoMME with subtitles: 87.7).
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run Qwen3.6 27B.
Usage
Past 30 DaysVision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across six vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.
Evals updated September 5, 2026Pricing updated September 15, 2026
Qwen3.6 27B averages 73.6% across the six Vision Evals tasks, ranking #20 of 53 models overall.
Its weakest relative showing is Identification, ranking #32 of 53 at 82.3%.
At $0.0051 per sample it is the 27th cheapest of the 53 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 42.1s per sample makes it the 52nd fastest.
Field medians: Object Detection 53.9%, Counting 56.8%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 88.7%, Data Extraction 84.5%, Reasoning 54.1%.
| Task | Score | Field (0 to 100) | Rank | Cost / sample | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection | 59.7% ±0.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.0 to 60.8 | #15 of 53 | $0.0023 | 17.47s | |
| Counting | 67.1% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.2 to 71.6 | #18 of 53 | $0.0092 | 78.17s | |
| Identification | 82.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 | #32 of 53 | $0.0052 | 44.57s | |
| OCR | 88.5% ±1.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.7 to 90.6 | #28 of 53 | $0.0044 | 36.22s | |
| Data Extraction | 84.5% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 83.5 to 85.6 | #25 of 53 | $0.0026 | 19.21s | |
| Reasoning | 59.2% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.6 to 60.9 | #21 of 53 | $0.0095 | 80.78s |
Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.
52 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all six tasks at low effort · Qwen3.6 27B highlighted
Qwen3.6 27B scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at low effort; this model has no separate high-effort tier because its chat template only switches thinking on or off · Methodology
View all Vision Evals →3 quantizations of Qwen3.6 27B, served with vLLM from the published weights and scored on the same tasks as the hosted models. Expand a row for the GPUs it was measured on.
Self-hosted rows run with thinking on, the same setting as the hosted frontier models. Rows marked with a run count are the mean of three runs per task under the benchmark protocol; the rest are single runs awaiting their re-run. Some hosted open-weight rows still run without thinking, so a self-hosted quant can score above its own hosted API. Quantization still costs a little precision, and scores vary between runs.
Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.300 per 1M input tokens and $2.00 per 1M output tokens.
Pricing updated Sep 15, 2026
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
Qwen3.6 27B is released under Apache-2.0, a permissive license. The Qwen3.6 27B license lets you run, fine-tune, and redistribute the model in commercial products with no obligation to open-source related code changes, so no separate commercial license is required.
Apache-2.0 grants an express patent license that terminates if you bring a patent claim over the work, and it disclaims warranties. Validate Qwen3.6 27B on your own data before you depend on it in production.
Read the full Apache 2.0 license ↗This is the straightforward case: a permissive license is the best technical solution and you are free to deploy Qwen3.6 27B commercially without open-sourcing your own code.
Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project — our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.
Talk to salesThis model is released under the Apache License 2.0, a permissive open-source license that allows commercial use, modification, distribution, and patent use.
Yes. Under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license, you can freely use this model for commercial purposes, including in proprietary products. You must retain the copyright notice and disclaimers when redistributing.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.
Yes. Qwen3.6 27B accepts image input and handles OCR, data extraction, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is Object Detection at 59.7% (#15 of 53 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.
Yes. its transcriptions match the ground truth 88.5% on average (#28 of 53 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR. Pulling specific fields out of documents (data extraction) scores 84.5%.
It's serviceable. On Vision Evals, Qwen3.6 27B scores 59.7% mAP@50 on object detection (#15 of 53 at low effort) and 67.1% judge-graded accuracy on object counting.
On our benchmark's task mix, Qwen3.6 27B averages $0.0051 per sample at $0.30 per 1M input and $2.00 per 1M output tokens (#27 of 53 on cost), with an average speed of 42.1s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.
On the overall Vision Evals ranking, Qwen3.6 27B sits #20 of 53 at 73.6%, just behind GPT-5.6 Terra (73.8%) and just ahead of Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (71.9%). See the full side-by-side: Qwen3.6 27B vs GPT-5.6 Terra.