Roboflow

GoogleGoogleReleased Aug 2026Proprietary

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores 80.1% overall on Roboflow's Vision Evals (November 12, 2026 snapshot), #10 of 69 models (Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks higher at 81.8%).

Its best task is reasoning (80.8%, #12 of 69) and its weakest is OCR (73.9%, #12 of 53). It is a proprietary model from Google, so commercial use follows Google's terms.

Vision Evals80.1%Field median 64.7% · #10 of 69
Cost$0.0033/ sampleField median $0.0035 · #32 of 69
Speed11.0s/ sampleField median 10.2s · #39 of 69

Gemini 3.7 Flash Interactive Demo

Model settings

Thinking level

Max output tokens

Default 65,536 · max 65,536

Sign in to adjust thinking and output length per run.

Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Vision Evals

Vision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across five vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.

Evals updated November 12, 2026Pricing updated November 13, 2026

Strengths and weaknesses

Best showing

TaskScoreMedianRank
Reasoning80.8%60.5%#12 of 69

Weak spot

TaskScoreMedianRank
OCR73.9%65.2%#12 of 53

Above the field median, but its lowest rank.

Score by taskScoreRank
Identification
96.9%#7
OCR
73.9%#12
Reasoning
80.8%#12
Object Detection
70.5%#13
Counting
78.4%#15

Gemini 3.7 FlashField median

Ranks out of 69 models (53 for OCR)

Results by task

TaskScoreField (0 to 100)RankCost / sampleSpeed
Object Detection (low)
70.5%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 69.4 to 71.5
#13 of 69$0.004719.71s
Object Detection (high)
74.3%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.3 to 75.0
#13 of 37$0.008922.34s
Counting (low)
78.4%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 79.7
#15 of 69$0.002517.62s
Counting (high)
79.3%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 81.1
#13 of 37$0.005610.93s
Identification (low)
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
#7 of 69$0.001313.22s
Identification (high)
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
#3 of 37$0.00216.28s
OCR (low)
73.9%
#12 of 53$0.00325.58s
Single value
74.8%
Transcription
91.1%
Structured JSON
86.7%
Text localization
29.4%
OCR (high)
78.8%
#7 of 53$0.01010.18s
Single value
71.7%
Transcription
91.9%
Structured JSON
90.6%
Text localization
59.2%
Reasoning (low)
80.8%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.8 to 82.8
#12 of 69$0.002214.71s
Reasoning (high)
81.9%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.1 to 82.8
#12 of 56$0.00509.81s
  • Thinking longer helps: 3.8 points higher on object detection at high effort for 1.9x the cost and 1.1x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 0.9 points higher on counting at high effort for 2.2x the cost and 0.6x the latency.
  • Thinking longer changes nothing: the same identification score at high effort for 1.6x the cost and 0.5x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 4.9 points higher on ocr at high effort for 3.2x the cost and 1.8x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 1.1 points higher on reasoning at high effort for 2.3x the cost and 0.7x the latency.

Price vs. performance

Score vs. cost

Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.

68 of 69 models plotted (the rest have no measured figure for this axis) · scores and efficiency pooled across all five tasks at low effort · Gemini 3.7 Flash highlighted

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at both low and high effort; OCR is a single preliminary run · Methodology

View all Vision Evals →

Gemini 3.7 Flash Overview

Gemini 3.7 Flash is a proprietary multimodal model from Google, positioned in the Flash branch of the Gemini 3 series that trades some of the capacity of the larger Pro models for lower latency and lower cost per token. It accepts interleaved text and image input alongside other modalities handled by the Gemini family and returns text, and it continues the series pattern of exposing a configurable thinking budget so that reasoning effort can be scaled up for harder problems or reduced for high throughput extraction, routing and classification work. The model is announced roughly three weeks after Gemini 3.6 Flash, part of an unusually fast iteration cadence within the Flash line.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Pricing

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.750 per 1M input tokens and $3.75 per 1M output tokens.

Input$0.750 / 1M tokens
Output$3.75 / 1M tokens
Cached input$0.075 / 1M tokens

Pricing updated Nov 13, 2026

Deploy Gemini 3.7 Flash with an API

Gemini 3.7 Flash runs as a hosted REST endpoint through Roboflow Workflows. Pick a task, then hand the prompt to your coding agent or copy the code. Deploying the workflow into a free Roboflow workspace replaces the your-workspace and YOUR_API_KEY placeholders with your own.

Connect your agent to Roboflow (once)

Add the Roboflow MCP server

claude mcp add --transport http roboflow https://mcp.roboflow.com/mcp

Run /mcp and authorize Roboflow in your browser when the OAuth flow opens.

Start a new Claude Code session so the MCP loads, then paste the prompt below (it works the same in any agent).

Deploy this workflow to your Roboflow workspace to use it.

Integrate the Roboflow "Gemini 3.7 Flash" workflow into my app.

- Endpoint: POST https://serverless.roboflow.com/<your-workspace>/workflows/gemini-3-7-flash-captioning
- Auth: send my Roboflow API key as `api_key` in the request body, read from the ROBOFLOW_API_KEY env var (never hardcode).
- Body: { "api_key": ..., "inputs": { `image`: { type: "url" | "base64", value } } }.
- Billing: this workflow needs no provider API key — inference runs on my Roboflow credits. A BYO provider key can be added to the model step in the Roboflow workflow editor later.

With the Roboflow MCP connected, call `workflows_get` on "gemini-3-7-flash-captioning" to read the exact input schema (the source of truth), then `workflows_run` on a sample image to confirm the output shape before writing code (the MCP is authenticated, so this needs no key). Without the MCP, use the contract above.

Before running the app, set up these keys so it does not error at runtime:
- `ROBOFLOW_API_KEY` (sent as `api_key`) from https://app.roboflow.com/settings/api
Create a .gitignore'd .env with these variables, using placeholder values for any I haven't given you. Then pause and tell me directly, in your reply: the full path to the .env file, exactly which keys I need to paste in, and the link to get each one. Wait for me to confirm I've added them before you run anything. Do not run the app until I confirm.

Then add the integration to my codebase: match my project's language, framework, and conventions; read every key from environment variables (never hardcode); add basic error handling; and include a small runnable example. If you can't tell what language my project uses, ask me.
Installpip install inference-sdk

Deploy this workflow to your Roboflow workspace to use it.

# Inference runs on your Roboflow credits — no provider API key needed. To bill your own provider account instead, add an api_key to the model step in the Roboflow workflow editor.
# 1. Import the library
from inference_sdk import InferenceHTTPClient

# 2. Connect to your workflow
client = InferenceHTTPClient(
  api_url="https://serverless.roboflow.com",
  api_key="YOUR_API_KEY"
)

# 3. Run your workflow on an image
result = client.run_workflow(
  workspace_name="your-workspace",
  workflow_id="gemini-3-7-flash-captioning",
  images={
    "image": "YOUR_IMAGE.jpg"  # Path to your image file
  },
  use_cache=True  # cache workflow definition for 15 minutes
)

# 4. Get your results
print(result)

Deploy this workflow to your Roboflow workspace to use it.

// Inference runs on your Roboflow credits — no provider API key needed. To bill your own provider account instead, add an api_key to the model step in the Roboflow workflow editor.
const response = await fetch('https://serverless.roboflow.com/your-workspace/workflows/gemini-3-7-flash-captioning', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: {
    'Content-Type': 'application/json'
  },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    api_key: 'YOUR_API_KEY',
    inputs: {
      "image": {"type": "url", "value": "IMAGE_URL"}
    }
  })
});

const result = await response.json();
console.log(result);

Deploy this workflow to your Roboflow workspace to use it.

# Inference runs on your Roboflow credits — no provider API key needed. To bill your own provider account instead, add an api_key to the model step in the Roboflow workflow editor.
curl --location 'https://serverless.roboflow.com/your-workspace/workflows/gemini-3-7-flash-captioning' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{
  "api_key": "YOUR_API_KEY",
  "inputs": {
    "image": {"type": "url", "value": "IMAGE_URL"}
  }
}'

Gemini 3.7 Flash License

Proprietary

Gemini 3.7 Flash is proprietary: the weights are not distributed, and the Gemini 3.7 Flash license is the vendor's commercial terms of service that you accept when you call the API.

Commercial use
Permitted under the vendor terms, typically metered per token or per request, with the vendor usage policy applying to your inputs and outputs.
Modification
Not available. Gemini 3.7 Flash weights are closed, so you can configure prompts and use vendor-hosted fine-tuning where it is offered, but you cannot modify the model itself.
Redistribution
Not permitted. You cannot self-host or resell the model; you build on the hosted API instead.

Vendor terms govern data retention, whether your inputs can be trained on, rate limits, and regional availability, and they can change with notice. Review them if you handle regulated or customer data.

Do I need a commercial license for Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Proprietary terms are set by the vendor rather than negotiated per project, and no open-source obligation attaches to your code. If you would rather deploy an open model instead of Gemini 3.7 Flash, Roboflow's licensing page lists the models whose commercial license is included when you deploy on Roboflow.

Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project. Our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.

Talk to sales

License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Details

Details

Categoryclosed
ModalityMultimodal
Context Window1.0M
ParametersUndisclosed
LicenseProprietary
Release DateAug 2026

Vision Tasks

CaptioningChart Question AnsweringClassificationDocument Question AnsweringImage TaggingMulti-Label ClassificationOCRObject DetectionVision LanguageVisual Question Answering

Usage

Past 30 Days

Other Google Gemini Flash models

Other versions in the same family as Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Frequently Asked Questions About Gemini 3.7 Flash Vision

Yes. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts image input and handles OCR, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is Identification at 96.9% (#7 of 69 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.

Yes, and it is one of the model's strongest vision skills: it scores 73.9% (#12 of 53 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR, which covers single readings, full transcriptions, structured JSON, and locating text with boxes. Within that, full transcriptions score 91.1%, and returning the fields of a label or form as JSON scores 86.7%.

Yes. On Vision Evals, Gemini 3.7 Flash scores 70.5% mAP@50 on object detection (#13 of 69 at low effort) and 78.4% judge-graded accuracy on object counting.

On our benchmark's task mix, Gemini 3.7 Flash averages $0.0033 per sample at $0.75 per 1M input and $3.75 per 1M output tokens (#32 of 69 on cost), with an average speed of 11.0s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.

On the overall Vision Evals ranking, Gemini 3.7 Flash sits #10 of 69 at 80.1%, just behind GPT-6.1 Sol (81.7%) and just ahead of Gemini 3.8 Flash (79.8%). See the full side-by-side: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol.