Gemini 4 Argon is Google DeepMind's frontier Gemini 4 model, built to sustain extended reasoning across long-horizon workflows in software engineering, enterprise knowledge work such as legal and finance, scientific analysis, and defensive cybersecurity. It accepts text, image, video, and document input and returns text, operating over a one million token context window. The model raises the maximum output length to one million tokens, compared with a 64K ceiling on earlier Gemini releases, so a single reasoning trajectory can run for hundreds of thousands of tokens before terminating.
On the visual side, Argon targets multimodal document comprehension, professional chart analysis, and retrieval of specific details from long recordings, reporting 91.7% on LVBench for long-video understanding and 71.6% on Chartography for chart reasoning. Google also reports 77.9% on DeepSWE v1.1, 51.3% on AutomationBench, 68% on CWE-bench v1, and first place on the Vals Index, which aggregates finance, coding, legal, and tax tasks. Following Gemini API conventions, it localizes objects by emitting bounding boxes as [ymin, xmin, ymax, xmax] integers normalized to a 0 to 1000 range, which supports prompt driven detection and grounding alongside captioning, document parsing, and visual question answering. Google describes adversarial training and automated red teaming for indirect prompt injection resistance, plus chain-of-thought and action monitors that halt execution when behavior drifts outside user intent.
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Model settings
Thinking level
Max output tokens
Default 65,536 · max 65,536
Sign in to adjust thinking and output length per run.
Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run Gemini 4 Argon.
—
Usage
Past 30 DaysVision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across five vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 13, 2026
Gemini 4 Argon averages 87.5% across the five Vision Evals tasks, ranking #1 of 63 models overall.
It leads the field in Object Detection, Counting, OCR, and Reasoning.
Its weakest relative showing is Identification, ranking #8 of 63 at 93.8%.
At $0.0058 per sample it is the 40th cheapest of the 63 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 13.4s per sample makes it the 42nd fastest.
Field medians: Object Detection 54.4%, Counting 63.5%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 63.6%, Reasoning 57.6%.
| Task | Score | Field (0 to 100) | Rank | Cost / sample | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection (low) | 82.5% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.9 to 83.0 | #1 of 63 | $0.011 | 32.11s | |
| Object Detection (high) | 85.1% ±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.3 to 85.5 | #1 of 31 | $0.027 | 23.94s | |
| Counting (low) | 86.0% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 85.1 to 86.5 | #1 of 63 | $0.0024 | 3.47s | |
| Counting (high) | 90.5% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 89.2 to 91.9 | #1 of 31 | $0.010 | 11.00s | |
| Identification (low) | 93.8% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8 | #8 of 63 | $0.0024 | 3.82s | |
| Identification (high) | 96.9% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9 | #3 of 31 | $0.0057 | 6.24s | |
| OCR (low) | 85.7% | #1 of 47 | $0.0051 | 7.70s | |
| |||||
| OCR (high) | 88.0% | #1 of 47 | $0.022 | 21.29s | |
| |||||
| Reasoning (low) | 89.4% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.1 to 90.7 | #1 of 63 | $0.0024 | 11.97s | |
| Reasoning (high) | 91.4% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.7 to 92.0 | #1 of 50 | $0.013 | 12.95s | |
Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.
62 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all five tasks at low effort · Gemini 4 Argon highlighted
Gemini 4 Argon scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at both low and high effort; OCR is a single preliminary run · Methodology
View all Vision Evals →Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens.
Pricing updated Oct 13, 2026
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
Gemini 4 Argon is proprietary: the weights are not distributed, and the Gemini 4 Argon license is the vendor's commercial terms of service that you accept when you call the API.
Vendor terms govern data retention, whether your inputs can be trained on, rate limits, and regional availability, and they can change with notice. Review them if you handle regulated or customer data.
Proprietary terms are set by the vendor rather than negotiated per project, and no open-source obligation attaches to your code. If you would rather deploy an open model instead of Gemini 4 Argon, Roboflow's licensing page lists the models whose commercial license is included when you deploy on Roboflow.
Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project — our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.
Talk to salesThis model is proprietary. The author retains all rights, and use of the model is governed by their specific terms of service or license agreement.
Commercial use depends on the terms set by the model author. Most proprietary commercial models require a paid subscription, API key, or per-call billing. Check the provider’s pricing and terms-of-service for details.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.
Yes. Gemini 4 Argon accepts image input and handles OCR, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is Object Detection at 82.5% (#1 of 63 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.
Yes, and it is one of the model's strongest vision skills: it scores 85.7% (#1 of 47 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR, which covers single readings, full transcriptions, structured JSON, and locating text with boxes. Within that, full transcriptions score 95.5%, and returning the fields of a label or form as JSON scores 92.6%.
Yes. On Vision Evals, Gemini 4 Argon scores 82.5% mAP@50 on object detection (#1 of 63 at low effort) and 86% judge-graded accuracy on object counting.
On our benchmark's task mix, Gemini 4 Argon averages $0.0058 per sample at $2.00 per 1M input and $10.00 per 1M output tokens (#40 of 63 on cost), with an average speed of 13.4s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.
On the overall Vision Evals ranking, Gemini 4 Argon sits #1 of 63 at 87.5%, just ahead of GPT-6 Astra (83.4%). See the full side-by-side: Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra.