Claude Opus 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Anthropic and the first entry in the Claude 5.5 family. It accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a one million token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens per response. Adaptive thinking is always enabled on this model and cannot be disabled; thinking depth is instead governed by an effort parameter with five levels, where medium is the default, a change from the high default used by Claude Opus 5 and earlier Opus models. Anthropic reports a knowledge cutoff of June 2026.
On the visual side, Anthropic characterizes Opus 5.5 as its strongest Opus release for vision and computer use, describing improved reading of dense documents, charts, screenshots, and diagrams for document extraction and visual analysis tasks. Published results include 89.0% on Chartography with tools and 81.8% on OSWorld 2.0 under partial credit scoring, alongside 48.7% under strict scoring reported in the system card. The accompanying system card states that Opus 5.5 scored higher than Opus 5 on every evaluation in its capability summary, with the largest gains concentrated in agentic coding, visual reasoning, computer use, and long-horizon knowledge work. The model ships with safety classifiers covering biology and cybersecurity that can route blocked requests to earlier Claude models.
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Model settings
Extended thinking
Max output tokens
Default 65,536 · max 65,536
Sign in to adjust thinking and output length per run.
Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run Claude Opus 5.5.
—
Usage
Past 30 DaysVision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across five vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 16, 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 averages 82.0% across the five Vision Evals tasks, ranking #3 of 63 models overall.
It places in the top three for OCR and Counting.
Its weakest relative showing is Identification, ranking #8 of 63 at 93.8%.
At $0.015 per sample it is the 54th cheapest of the 63 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 7.6s per sample makes it the 13th fastest.
Field medians: Object Detection 54.4%, Counting 63.5%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 63.6%, Reasoning 57.6%.
| Task | Score | Field (0 to 100) | Rank | Cost / sample | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection (low) | 74.5% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.0 to 75.0 | #6 of 63 | $0.021 | 9.03s | |
| Object Detection (high) | 76.0% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.7 to 77.0 | #7 of 31 | $0.030 | 12.10s | |
| Counting (low) | 80.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 82.4 | #3 of 63 | $0.0081 | 10.24s | |
| Counting (high) | 82.0% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 83.8 | #4 of 31 | $0.0098 | 11.95s | |
| Identification (low) | 93.8% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8 | #8 of 63 | $0.0058 | 6.22s | |
| Identification (high) | 95.8% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 96.9 | #7 of 31 | $0.0067 | 9.81s | |
| OCR (low) | 78.3% | #2 of 47 | $0.016 | 5.94s | |
| |||||
| OCR (high) | 79.9% | #2 of 47 | $0.023 | 8.96s | |
| |||||
| Reasoning (low) | 83.0% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 84.1 | #5 of 63 | $0.0090 | 11.05s | |
| Reasoning (high) | 85.9% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 88.1 | #4 of 50 | $0.011 | 9.12s | |
Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.
62 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all five tasks at low effort · Claude Opus 5.5 highlighted
Claude Opus 5.5 scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at both low and high effort; OCR is a single preliminary run · Methodology
View all Vision Evals →Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 per 1M input tokens and $20.00 per 1M output tokens.
Pricing updated Oct 16, 2026
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
Other versions in the same family as Claude Opus 5.5.
Claude Opus 5.5 is proprietary: the weights are not distributed, and the Claude Opus 5.5 license is the vendor's commercial terms of service that you accept when you call the API.
Vendor terms govern data retention, whether your inputs can be trained on, rate limits, and regional availability, and they can change with notice. Review them if you handle regulated or customer data.
Proprietary terms are set by the vendor rather than negotiated per project, and no open-source obligation attaches to your code. If you would rather deploy an open model instead of Claude Opus 5.5, Roboflow's licensing page lists the models whose commercial license is included when you deploy on Roboflow.
Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project — our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.
Talk to salesThis model is proprietary. The author retains all rights, and use of the model is governed by their specific terms of service or license agreement.
Commercial use depends on the terms set by the model author. Most proprietary commercial models require a paid subscription, API key, or per-call billing. Check the provider’s pricing and terms-of-service for details.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.
Yes. Claude Opus 5.5 accepts image input and handles OCR, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is OCR at 78.3% (#2 of 47 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.
Yes, and it is one of the model's strongest vision skills: it scores 78.3% (#2 of 47 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR, which covers single readings, full transcriptions, structured JSON, and locating text with boxes. Within that, full transcriptions score 96.7%, and returning the fields of a label or form as JSON scores 91.5%.
Yes. On Vision Evals, Claude Opus 5.5 scores 74.6% mAP@50 on object detection (#6 of 63 at low effort) and 80.6% judge-graded accuracy on object counting.
On our benchmark's task mix, Claude Opus 5.5 averages $0.02 per sample at $4.00 per 1M input and $20.00 per 1M output tokens (#54 of 63 on cost), with an average speed of 7.6s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.
On the overall Vision Evals ranking, Claude Opus 5.5 sits #3 of 63 at 82%, just behind GPT-6 Astra (83.4%) and just ahead of Gemini 3.5 Flash (81.8%). See the full side-by-side: Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra.