Claude Fable 5.1 is a proprietary multimodal model from Anthropic in the Mythos-class tier of the Claude 5 family, positioned above Claude Opus for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. It accepts text and images as input and returns text, with a one million token context window and a maximum output of 128 thousand tokens. Adaptive thinking is always on, and an effort parameter controls how much reasoning the model applies to a given request. Anthropic reports a reliable knowledge and training data cutoff of June 2026. Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 share the same underlying model; the difference between them is the set of safety classifiers applied to dual-use cybersecurity and biology requests.
On the vision side, Anthropic documents improvements in reading dense charts, financial filings, and tables nested inside PDF documents, which extends the model toward document understanding, chart question answering, and spreadsheet and slide work. Reported evaluations cover agentic scientific research on Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, agentic coding on Terminal-Bench 4.0, computer use on OSWorld 2.0, and multidisciplinary reasoning on Humanity's Last Exam. Model weights are not published.
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Model settings
Extended thinking
Max output tokens
Default 65,536 · max 65,536
Sign in to adjust thinking and output length per run.
Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run Claude Fable 5.1.
—
Usage
Past 30 DaysVision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across five vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026
Claude Fable 5.1 averages 74.7% across the five Vision Evals tasks, ranking #14 of 63 models overall.
Its weakest relative showing is Counting, ranking #20 of 63 at 69.4%.
At $0.039 per sample it is the 62nd cheapest of the 63 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 8.3s per sample makes it the 18th fastest.
Field medians: Object Detection 54.4%, Counting 63.5%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 63.6%, Reasoning 57.6%.
| Task | Score | Field (0 to 100) | Rank | Cost / sample | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection (low) | 61.4% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 61.0 to 62.0 | #17 of 63 | $0.060 | 11.98s | |
| Object Detection (high) | 65.0% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.6 to 65.3 | #18 of 31 | $0.078 | 17.13s | |
| Counting (low) | 69.4% ±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 71.6 | #20 of 63 | $0.019 | 5.75s | |
| Counting (high) | 73.0% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.6 to 77.0 | #17 of 31 | $0.023 | 6.53s | |
| Identification (low) | 97.9% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0 | #5 of 63 | $0.013 | 5.01s | |
| Identification (high) | 96.9% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 100.0 | #3 of 31 | $0.014 | 4.95s | |
| OCR (low) | 72.9% | #9 of 47 | $0.039 | 7.94s | |
| |||||
| OCR (high) | 75.3% | #10 of 47 | $0.051 | 10.22s | |
| |||||
| Reasoning (low) | 72.0% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 70.9 to 73.5 | #17 of 63 | $0.019 | 5.94s | |
| Reasoning (high) | 73.1% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.5 to 75.5 | #20 of 50 | $0.028 | 8.05s | |
Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.
62 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all five tasks at low effort · Claude Fable 5.1 highlighted
Claude Fable 5.1 scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at both low and high effort; OCR is a single preliminary run · Methodology
View all Vision Evals →Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output tokens.
Pricing updated Oct 17, 2026
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
Other versions in the same family as Claude Fable 5.1.
Claude Fable 5.1 is proprietary: the weights are not distributed, and the Claude Fable 5.1 license is the vendor's commercial terms of service that you accept when you call the API.
Vendor terms govern data retention, whether your inputs can be trained on, rate limits, and regional availability, and they can change with notice. Review them if you handle regulated or customer data.
Proprietary terms are set by the vendor rather than negotiated per project, and no open-source obligation attaches to your code. If you would rather deploy an open model instead of Claude Fable 5.1, Roboflow's licensing page lists the models whose commercial license is included when you deploy on Roboflow.
Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project — our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.
Talk to salesThis model is proprietary. The author retains all rights, and use of the model is governed by their specific terms of service or license agreement.
Commercial use depends on the terms set by the model author. Most proprietary commercial models require a paid subscription, API key, or per-call billing. Check the provider’s pricing and terms-of-service for details.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.
Yes. Claude Fable 5.1 accepts image input and handles OCR, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is Identification at 97.9% (#5 of 63 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.
Yes, and it is one of the model's strongest vision skills: it scores 72.9% (#9 of 47 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR, which covers single readings, full transcriptions, structured JSON, and locating text with boxes. Within that, full transcriptions score 84.7%, and returning the fields of a label or form as JSON scores 89.2%.
It's serviceable. On Vision Evals, Claude Fable 5.1 scores 61.4% mAP@50 on object detection (#17 of 63 at low effort) and 69.4% judge-graded accuracy on object counting.
On our benchmark's task mix, Claude Fable 5.1 averages $0.04 per sample at $10.00 per 1M input and $50.00 per 1M output tokens (#62 of 63 on cost), with an average speed of 8.3s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.
On the overall Vision Evals ranking, Claude Fable 5.1 sits #14 of 63 at 74.7%, just behind Gemini 3.1 Pro (76.8%) and just ahead of Muse Spark 1.1 (74.4%). See the full side-by-side: Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro.