TrOCR (Transformer-based Optical Character Recognition) is an end-to-end OCR model released in September 2021 by Microsoft Research. It departs from the traditional two-stage OCR pipeline — which typically combines a CNN-based feature extractor with an RNN-based sequence decoder — by using a pure Transformer architecture composed of a pretrained image Transformer encoder and a pretrained text Transformer decoder, an approach that later became standardized as the VisionEncoderDecoder pattern in Hugging Face Transformers.
TrOCR takes a cropped text line image as input and produces a sequence of output tokens, supporting printed, handwritten, and scene text recognition. The model is designed for use downstream of a separate text detection stage — TrOCR recognizes text in pre-cropped regions rather than detecting text locations in a full page. Microsoft released three size variants: TrOCR-small (62M parameters, DeiT-small encoder + MiniLM decoder), TrOCR-base (334M parameters, BEiT-base encoder + RoBERTa-large decoder), and TrOCR-large (558M parameters, BEiT-large encoder + RoBERTa-large decoder). Pretrained and fine-tuned checkpoints are available for printed text (on SROIE), handwritten text (on IAM), and scene text (on the standard scene text benchmarks) under the MIT license, distributed through the Microsoft unilm repository and Hugging Face. At release, TrOCR achieved state-of-the-art results across all three benchmark categories, and the model continues to be used as a baseline for handwritten text recognition.
| Category | Passed | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Text Recognition | 16 / 30 | 53.3% |
| Focused Scene OCR | 34 / 99 | 34.3% |
| License Plate Recognition | 10 / 30 | 33.3% |
| VQA & Extraction | 0 / 60 | 0% |
| Handwritten Math | 0 / 10 | 0% |
Scores based on a single evaluation run · Methodology
View all Vision Evals →Estimated cost per task vs. OCR score, for this model and others ranked near it. Upper-left is the sweet spot (high quality, low cost).
6 of 7 models plotted · 1 not yet evaluated
| Model | Score | Median tokens | Est. cost / task | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 67.3% | 866 | $0.0039 | Compare |
| Gemma 3 4B | 64.2% | 314 | <$0.0001 | Compare |
| GPT-5.4 Nano | 62.5% | 294 | $0.0001 | Compare |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 61.6% | 861 | $0.0012 | Compare |
| Qwen3.6 Plus | 58.5% | 166 | $0.0001 | Compare |
| TrOCR(this model) | 26.2% | — | — | — |
| Kimi K2.5 | 19.6% | 706 | $0.0006 | Compare |
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
License terms and commercial-use guidance for TrOCR.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.