Roboflow

Xiaomi: MiMo V2.6 Pro

MiMo V2.6 Pro Overview

MiMo V2.6 Pro is the flagship omni-modal foundation model in Xiaomi's MiMo V2.6 series, released as open weights alongside a Flash variant and a 9B distillation of Qwen3.5. It uses a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with 1.02 trillion total parameters and roughly 42 billion activated per token, paired with a hybrid attention design that interleaves sliding-window and global attention layers to support a context window of about one million tokens. Dedicated encoders handle non-text inputs, including a vision encoder of roughly 681 million parameters and an audio tokenizer stack, so the model accepts text, images, video, and audio and returns text.

Post-training centers on large-scale reinforcement learning across thousands of interactive environments, combined with agentic grading, self-correction cold start, and a multi-prefix multi-teacher on-policy distillation stage that extends behavior to tasks that are hard to verify automatically. The resulting model targets long-horizon agentic work such as software engineering, terminal and computer-use operation, tool calling, cybersecurity analysis, and visual coding, and it reports gains over the prior MiMo generation on SWE-bench Verified, Terminal Bench, and internal visual coding and cyber benchmarks.

MiMo V2.6 Pro Interactive Demo

Model settings

Thinking level

Max output tokens

Default 65,536 · max 65,536

Sign in to adjust thinking and output length per run.

Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run MiMo V2.6 Pro.

MiMo V2.6 Pro Details & Performance

Details

Resources

—

Vision Tasks

CaptioningChart Question AnsweringClassificationDocument Question AnsweringImage TaggingMulti-Label ClassificationOCRVision LanguageVisual Question Answering

Features

Foundation VisionLLMs with Vision CapabilitiesMultimodal Vision

Usage

Past 30 Days

Performance

Avg. Latency

MiMo V2.6 Pro Vision Evals

Vision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across five vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 16, 2026

Overall score#54 of 63
50.3%
Avg cost / sample#17 of 63
$0.0011
Avg speed / sample#23 of 63
9.45s
Avg tokens / sample
2.1K

Strengths and weaknesses

MiMo V2.6 Pro averages 50.3% across the five Vision Evals tasks, ranking #54 of 63 models overall.

Its weakest relative showing is Identification, ranking #55 of 63 at 76.0%.

At $0.0011 per sample it is the 17th cheapest of the 63 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 9.5s per sample makes it the 23rd fastest.

Performance profile

Field medianMiMo V2.6 Pro

Field medians: Object Detection 54.4%, Counting 63.5%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 63.6%, Reasoning 57.6%.

Results by task

TaskScoreField (0 to 100)RankCost / sampleSpeed
Object Detection (low)
42.0%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 40.9 to 43.1
#43 of 63$0.001415.50s
Object Detection (high)
46.7%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.7 to 47.3
#25 of 31$0.003045.14s
Counting (low)
50.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.6 to 52.7
#48 of 63$0.00053.47s
Counting (high)
59.0%
±5.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 52.7 to 63.5
#29 of 31$0.001642.05s
Identification (low)
76.0%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 78.1
#55 of 63$0.00043.33s
Identification (high)
78.1%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 81.3
#31 of 31$0.001228.01s
OCR (low)
48.6%
#45 of 47$0.00129.41s
Single value
37.0%
Transcription
68.2%
Structured JSON
67.7%
Text localization
18.7%
OCR (high)
49.9%
#46 of 47$0.003458.34s
Single value
40.4%
Transcription
59.9%
Structured JSON
70.2%
Text localization
16.8%
Reasoning (low)
35.1%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 32.5 to 37.8
#51 of 63$0.00053.82s
Reasoning (high)
55.9%
±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 58.9
#44 of 50$0.002668.29s
  • Thinking longer helps: 4.7 points higher on object detection at high effort for 2.2x the cost and 2.9x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 9 points higher on counting at high effort for 3.3x the cost and 12.1x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 2.1 points higher on identification at high effort for 2.8x the cost and 8.4x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 1.3 points higher on ocr at high effort for 2.8x the cost and 6.2x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 20.8 points higher on reasoning at high effort for 5.5x the cost and 17.9x the latency.

Price vs. performance

Score vs. cost

Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.

62 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all five tasks at low effort · MiMo V2.6 Pro highlighted

MiMo V2.6 Pro scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at both low and high effort; OCR is a single preliminary run · Methodology

View all Vision Evals →

MiMo V2.6 Pro Pricing

MiMo V2.6 Pro costs $0.435 per 1M input tokens and $0.870 per 1M output tokens.

Input$0.435 / 1M tokens
Output$0.870 / 1M tokens
Cached input$0.004 / 1M tokens

Pricing updated Oct 16, 2026

Alternatives to MiMo V2.6 Pro

Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.

Mistral
Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4, nicknamed Le Chonk, is a natively multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Mistral that accepts interleaved text and image input and produces text output. It uses a granular MoE design with roughly 1.05 trillion total parameters and 49 billion active per token, reported as 52 billion when embeddings and output layers are counted, paired with a 1.6 billion parameter vision encoder and a context window of one million tokens. The model is trained from scratch on about 3,800 NVIDIA Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's European data centers and supports more than 160 languages. It behaves as a hybrid instruct and reasoning system, with a reasoning effort setting that selects between direct answers and longer deliberation, alongside function calling and structured output for agentic workflows.Image understanding is a focus of this generation, covering documents, charts, technical drawings and natural scenes, and the model emits bounding box coordinates for visual grounding queries. Reported grounding results include 42 percent on Dense200 and 73 percent on the DIOR-RSVG remote sensing benchmark. Mistral describes agentic vision workflows in which the model zooms into gigapixel satellite imagery or engineering drawings to verify details, and reports coding results such as 62 percent on DeepSWE. Figures published at preview time are preliminary because the reinforcement learning phase is still in progress.
MoonshotAI
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 is a frontier-scale multimodal AI model developed by Moonshot AI and released on January 27, 2026. As a significant advancement within the Kimi K2 family, it utilizes a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 1 trillion total parameters (32 billion active per inference) and a massive 256K-token context window. The model features native multimodal integration via a 400M-parameter MoonViT encoder, allowing it to process text, images, and video frames simultaneously. Built for both speed and depth, it offers "Instant" and "Thinking" modes, the latter of which excels at expert-level reasoning, scoring 50.2% on the Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE) benchmark when equipped with tools.The model is released under a Modified MIT License, which remains open-weight but requires attribution for high-revenue commercial entities. It introduces an "Agent Swarm" paradigm capable of coordinating up to 100 specialized sub-agents for parallel workflows, significantly reducing latency in complex research tasks. For vision tasks, Kimi K2.5 demonstrates strong autonomous visual debugging capabilities, where it can inspect its own generated UI outputs against visual specifications to iteratively refine frontend code. This makes it a powerful choice for developers testing automated UI reconstruction, high-fidelity OCR document processing, and multi-step agentic research grounded in complex visual data.
OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol is a reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series that accepts text and image input and returns text. It is an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol positioned to approach the intelligence of the larger GPT-6 Astra model on agentic coding, computer use, and professional knowledge work. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning effort control, ranging from low settings for simple turns to maximum settings for harder tasks, and can be driven with tool use enabled or disabled. It operates over a context window of roughly one million tokens and emits up to 128,000 output tokens in a single response, which supports long-running agent loops over large codebases and multi-document collections. Audio and video inputs are not supported.On the visual side, the model is evaluated on GDP.pdf, a benchmark that asks professional questions about complex PDF documents containing tables, charts, diagrams, and fine-print details, and on OSWorld 2.0, which measures agents operating graphical computer applications. OpenAI reports that GPT-6.1 Sol performs on par with or better than GPT-6 Sol across its image input safety evaluations, and that the share of responses containing a factual error at low reasoning effort falls from 11.4 percent to 7.7 percent.
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Anthropic and the first entry in the Claude 5.5 family. It accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a one million token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens per response. Adaptive thinking is always enabled on this model and cannot be disabled; thinking depth is instead governed by an effort parameter with five levels, where medium is the default, a change from the high default used by Claude Opus 5 and earlier Opus models. Anthropic reports a knowledge cutoff of June 2026.On the visual side, Anthropic characterizes Opus 5.5 as its strongest Opus release for vision and computer use, describing improved reading of dense documents, charts, screenshots, and diagrams for document extraction and visual analysis tasks. Published results include 89.0% on Chartography with tools and 81.8% on OSWorld 2.0 under partial credit scoring, alongside 48.7% under strict scoring reported in the system card. The accompanying system card states that Opus 5.5 scored higher than Opus 5 on every evaluation in its capability summary, with the largest gains concentrated in agentic coding, visual reasoning, computer use, and long-horizon knowledge work. The model ships with safety classifiers covering biology and cybersecurity that can route blocked requests to earlier Claude models.
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Meta Superintelligence Labs and the fourth Muse Spark release in five months, arriving on September 2, 2026. It takes text, images, video, and document files as input and returns text, and it operates over a context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Meta trains the model for long-horizon agentic work, so it carries accumulated context and prior tool results forward across many turns, reconciles messy or conflicting inputs, and asks for clarification when a task is underspecified. Visual inputs such as screenshots and video clips feed a reasoning loop that runs against a real execution environment rather than a scripted sequence of steps.The model exposes graded reasoning effort settings. An xhigh configuration is generally available at launch, while a max reasoning configuration aimed at harder reasoning and agentic problems arrives after further safety testing. Artificial Analysis measures Muse Spark 1.3 (max) at 62 on its Intelligence Index and the xhigh configuration at 61, with agentic tool-use evaluations driving most of the gain over Muse Spark 1.2; max reaches 52% on Tau3-Bench Banking by spending more turns and reasoning tokens than xhigh. Prior Muse Spark versions emit bounding box coordinates, transcriptions, and structured field extractions from images on Roboflow Vision Evals.

MiMo V2.6 Pro License

MIT · Permissive license

MiMo V2.6 Pro is released under MIT, a permissive license. The MiMo V2.6 Pro license lets you use, modify, and sell work built on the model, with the copyright notice as the only real obligation and no requirement to open-source related code changes.

Commercial use
Permitted with no separate commercial license. No usage caps, revenue thresholds, or field-of-use limits apply to MiMo V2.6 Pro.
Modification
Permitted. You can fine-tune or rewrite MiMo V2.6 Pro and keep the result closed-source.
Redistribution
Permitted. Include the original copyright and permission notice in copies or substantial portions of the work.

MIT grants no explicit patent license and disclaims all warranties. If patent exposure is a concern for your deployment, review it with counsel before launch.

Read the full MIT license ↗

Do I need a commercial license for MiMo V2.6 Pro?

No commercial license is needed for MiMo V2.6 Pro: permissive terms let you keep related code private while deploying commercially.

Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project — our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.

Talk to sales

This model is released under the MIT License, a short and permissive open-source license that allows commercial use, modification, and redistribution.

Yes. Under the terms of the MIT license, you can freely use this model for commercial purposes. You must retain the copyright notice and license text when redistributing.

License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.

Frequently Asked Questions About MiMo V2.6 Pro Vision

Yes. MiMo V2.6 Pro accepts image input and handles OCR, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is Object Detection at 42% (#43 of 63 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.

Yes. it scores 48.6% (#45 of 47 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR, which covers single readings, full transcriptions, structured JSON, and locating text with boxes. Within that, full transcriptions score 68.2%, and returning the fields of a label or form as JSON scores 67.7%.

Not its strength. On Vision Evals, MiMo V2.6 Pro scores 42% mAP@50 on object detection (#43 of 63 at low effort) and 50% judge-graded accuracy on object counting. For production counting or precise localization, pairing it with a specialized detector like RF-DETR or your own trained model in a Roboflow Workflow is usually more reliable: detect the objects, then count the detections.

On our benchmark's task mix, MiMo V2.6 Pro averages $0.0011 per sample at $0.43 per 1M input and $0.87 per 1M output tokens (#17 of 63 on cost), with an average speed of 9.5s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.

On the overall Vision Evals ranking, MiMo V2.6 Pro sits #54 of 63 at 50.3%, just behind Qwen3.7 Flash (52.4%) and just ahead of MiMo V2.6 Flash (49.2%). See the full side-by-side: MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash.