Grok 4.7 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from SpaceXAI that accepts images alongside text and returns text-only output. On visual inputs it supports image captioning, visual question answering, OCR, document and chart question answering, and image classification and tagging, with all results expressed as generated text rather than bounding boxes or masks. Its 500,000 token context window leaves room for several images, long documents, or extended conversations about visual content in a single request.
The model exposes a configurable reasoning effort setting with low, medium, high, and xhigh levels (high by default), letting callers trade latency for the amount of deliberation spent on a prompt, including multi-step questions about an image. Built on a larger base model than Grok 4.6 with extended reinforcement learning on harder tasks, it works longer on difficult problems and checks its own work more carefully at the same serving speed. SpaceXAI's launch materials focus on coding and agentic knowledge work and report no image benchmark results.
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Model settings
Thinking level
Max output tokens
Default 65,536 · max 65,536
Sign in to adjust thinking and output length per run.
Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run Grok 4.7.
—
—
Usage
Past 30 DaysVision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across five vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 16, 2026
Grok 4.7 averages 63.5% across the five Vision Evals tasks, ranking #31 of 63 models overall.
Its weakest relative showing is Object Detection, ranking #45 of 63 at 40.4%.
At $0.020 per sample it is the 56th cheapest of the 63 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 33.3s per sample makes it the 57th fastest.
Field medians: Object Detection 54.4%, Counting 63.5%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 63.6%, Reasoning 57.6%.
| Task | Score | Field (0 to 100) | Rank | Cost / sample | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection (low) | 40.4% ±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 39.8 to 41.0 | #45 of 63 | $0.021 | 32.56s | |
| Object Detection (high) | 41.2% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 39.6 to 42.8 | #28 of 31 | $0.028 | 49.09s | |
| Counting (low) | 61.7% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 63.5 | #34 of 63 | $0.011 | 16.76s | |
| Counting (high) | 60.8% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.5 to 62.2 | #28 of 31 | $0.017 | 32.45s | |
| Identification (low) | 87.5% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6 | #26 of 63 | $0.0063 | 6.18s | |
| Identification (high) | 80.2% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 81.3 | #30 of 31 | $0.0093 | 13.61s | |
| OCR | 63.6% | #23 of 47 | $0.023 | 38.94s | |
| |||||
| Reasoning (low) | 64.2% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.3 to 66.9 | #24 of 63 | $0.015 | 26.03s | |
| Reasoning (high) | 66.9% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.6 to 68.2 | #28 of 50 | $0.024 | 51.09s | |
Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.
62 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all five tasks at low effort · Grok 4.7 highlighted
Grok 4.7 scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at both low and high effort; OCR is a single preliminary run · Methodology
View all Vision Evals →Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output tokens.
Pricing updated Oct 16, 2026
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
Grok 4.7 is proprietary: the weights are not distributed, and the Grok 4.7 license is the vendor's commercial terms of service that you accept when you call the API.
Vendor terms govern data retention, whether your inputs can be trained on, rate limits, and regional availability, and they can change with notice. Review them if you handle regulated or customer data.
Proprietary terms are set by the vendor rather than negotiated per project, and no open-source obligation attaches to your code. If you would rather deploy an open model instead of Grok 4.7, Roboflow's licensing page lists the models whose commercial license is included when you deploy on Roboflow.
Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project — our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.
Talk to salesThis model is proprietary. The author retains all rights, and use of the model is governed by their specific terms of service or license agreement.
Commercial use depends on the terms set by the model author. Most proprietary commercial models require a paid subscription, API key, or per-call billing. Check the provider’s pricing and terms-of-service for details.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.
Yes. Grok 4.7 accepts image input and handles OCR, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is OCR at 63.6% (#23 of 47 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.
Yes. it scores 63.6% (#23 of 47 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR, which covers single readings, full transcriptions, structured JSON, and locating text with boxes. Within that, full transcriptions score 89.5%, and returning the fields of a label or form as JSON scores 86.4%.
Not its strength. On Vision Evals, Grok 4.7 scores 40.4% mAP@50 on object detection (#45 of 63 at low effort) and 61.7% judge-graded accuracy on object counting. For production counting or precise localization, pairing it with a specialized detector like RF-DETR or your own trained model in a Roboflow Workflow is usually more reliable: detect the objects, then count the detections.
On our benchmark's task mix, Grok 4.7 averages $0.02 per sample at $2.00 per 1M input and $6.00 per 1M output tokens (#56 of 63 on cost), with an average speed of 33.3s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.
On the overall Vision Evals ranking, Grok 4.7 sits #31 of 63 at 63.5%, just behind Qwen3.5 27B (64.1%) and just ahead of Qwen3.5 35B-A3B (62.5%). See the full side-by-side: Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.5 27B.