Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's first generally available Mythos-class large language model, released on June 9, 2026. It is built for long-horizon, asynchronous, and agentic tasks that prior Claude generations could not sustain, including multi-day autonomous coding sessions, complex knowledge work, and document-heavy analysis. The model supports a 1 million token context window with up to 128,000 output tokens per request and uses adaptive thinking as its sole reasoning mode, where the effort level is adjustable but raw chain-of-thought is never returned. Vision capabilities allow the model to parse diagrams, charts, and tables embedded in files and PDFs, and to use visual feedback to evaluate its own coding outputs against design goals. On benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Pro, the model scores 80.3% compared to 69.2% for Claude Opus 4.8, and it leads on CursorBench 3.1 for autonomous coding workflows.
Claude Fable 5 shares the same underlying model weights as Claude Mythos 5, but is deployed with safety classifiers that automatically reroute queries in high-risk domains — including cybersecurity, biology, and chemistry — to Claude Opus 4.8. These classifiers trigger in fewer than 5% of sessions on average. As a designated Covered Model, all traffic is subject to mandatory 30-day data retention to support safety monitoring. The model is available via the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry. Anthropic has not publicly disclosed parameter count, architecture details, or training data composition for this model.
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Captioning will run automatically
—
Usage
Past 30 DaysVision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across six vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.
Evals updated July 10, 2026Pricing updated July 21, 2026
Claude Fable 5 averages 79.6% across the six Vision Evals tasks, ranking #3 of 16 models overall.
It leads the field in Identification and OCR.
It also places in the top three for Reasoning.
Its weakest relative showing is Object Detection, ranking #9 of 16 at 40.6%.
At $0.029 per sample it is the 16th cheapest of the 16 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 8.4s per sample makes it the 13th fastest.
Field medians: Object Detection 41.5%, Counting 62.2%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 89.1%, Data Extraction 85.6%, Reasoning 76.1%.
| Task | Score | Field (0 to 100) | Rank | Cost / sample | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection | 40.6% | #9 of 16 | $0.040 | 10.6s | |
| Counting | 63.5% | #8 of 16 | $0.017 | 6.0s | |
| Identification | 100.0% | #1 of 16 | $0.014 | 5.6s | |
| OCR | 94.0% | #1 of 16 | $0.039 | 10.9s | |
| Data Extraction | 92.8% | #4 of 16 | $0.015 | 5.0s | |
| Reasoning | 87.0% | #2 of 16 | $0.017 | 5.7s |
Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.
16 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all six tasks · Claude Fable 5 highlighted
Claude Fable 5 scores from a single evaluation run · Methodology
View all Vision Evals →Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output tokens.
Pricing updated Jul 21, 2026
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
License terms and commercial-use guidance for Claude Fable 5.
This model is proprietary. The author retains all rights, and use of the model is governed by their specific terms of service or license agreement.
Commercial use depends on the terms set by the model author. Most proprietary commercial models require a paid subscription, API key, or per-call billing. Check the provider’s pricing and terms-of-service for details.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.
Yes. Claude Fable 5 accepts image input and handles OCR, data extraction, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is Identification at 100% (#1 of 16). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.
Yes, and it is one of the model's strongest vision skills: its transcriptions match the ground truth 94% on average (#1 of 16) on Vision Evals OCR. Pulling specific fields out of documents (data extraction) scores 92.8%.
Not its strength. On Vision Evals, Claude Fable 5 scores 40.6% mAP@50 on object detection (#9 of 16) and 63.5% exact-match accuracy on object counting. For production counting or precise localization, pairing it with a specialized detector like RF-DETR or your own trained model in a Roboflow Workflow is usually more reliable: detect the objects, then count the detections.
On our benchmark's task mix, Claude Fable 5 averages $0.03 per sample at $10.00 per 1M input and $50.00 per 1M output tokens (#16 of 16 on cost), with an average speed of 8.4s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.
On the overall Vision Evals ranking, Claude Fable 5 sits #3 of 16 at 79.6%, just behind Gemini 3.1 Pro (84.6%) and just ahead of Gemini 3 Flash (77.2%). See the full side-by-side: Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro.