Compare the best 91 vision LLMs and try 86 of them on your own images, free in the Roboflow Playground. 34 are open-weight, so you can self-host them for free under their licenses.
91 models · 34 open-weight · 86 free to try · prices synced Oct 27, 2026
Benchmark Leader
Gemini 4 Argon
Highest score on our vision benchmark across five tasks, 63 vision language models tested
Open-Weight Leader
Qwen3.8 27B
Best score among the open-weight models, #23 of 63 overall on our vision benchmark across five tasks
Fastest on Benchmark
Mage-VL 4B
Quickest in our vision benchmark across five tasks runs: 1.2s per request on average
Lowest Measured Cost
Mage-VL 4B
Cheapest in our vision benchmark across five tasks runs: <$0.0001 per request as measured, not list price
Ranked on our vision benchmark across five tasks, 63 vision language models tested, updated Oct 13, 2026
34 models with downloadable weights you can self-host under their licenses (Custom, MIT, and Apache 2.0). 29 run live in the Playground through hosted APIs, so self-hosting is optional.
| Actions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mistral Large 4Mistral | 1.05T total, 49B active | Custom | Oct 2026 | |
MiMo V2.6 FlashXiaomi | 309B total, 15B active | MIT | Sep 2026 | |
MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomi | 1.02T total, 42B active | MIT | Sep 2026 | |
GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai | 320B total, 18B active | MIT | Aug 2026 | |
Qwen3.8 27BQwen | 27.78B | Apache 2.0 | Aug 2026 | |
Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | 29.6B | Apache 2.0 | Aug 2026 | |
Kimi K3Moonshot AI | 2.8T | Modified MIT | Jul 2026 | |
Qwen3.6 27BQwen | 27B | Apache 2.0 | Apr 2026 | |
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen | 35B total, 3B active | Apache 2.0 | Apr 2026 | |
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle | 25.2B | Apache 2.0 | Apr 2026 | |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle | 31B | Apache 2.0 | Apr 2026 | |
GLM-OCRZ.ai | 0.9B | MIT | Mar 2026 | |
Qwen3.5 9bQwen | 9B | Apache 2.0 | Mar 2026 | |
| 122B | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2026 | ||
Qwen3.5 35B A3BQwen | 35B | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2026 | |
Qwen3.5-27BQwen | 27B | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2026 | |
| 397B | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2026 | ||
Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI | 1T | Modified MIT | Jan 2026 | |
| 8.8B | Apache 2.0 | Oct 2025 | ||
| 31B | Apache 2.0 | Oct 2025 | ||
| 235B | Apache 2.0 | Sep 2025 | ||
Llama 4 MaverickMeta | 400B | Custom | Apr 2025 | |
Llama 4 ScoutMeta | 109B | Custom | Apr 2025 | |
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral | 24B | Apache 2.0 | Mar 2025 | |
Gemma 3 12BGoogle | 12B | Custom | Mar 2025 | |
Gemma 3 27BGoogle | — | Custom | Mar 2025 | |
Gemma 3 4BGoogle | 4B | Custom | Mar 2025 | |
SmolVLM2Hugging Face | 256M – 2.2B | Apache 2.0 | Feb 2025 | |
| 7B | Apache 2.0 | Jan 2025 | ||
PaliGemma 2Google | 3B, 10B, 28B | Custom | Dec 2024 | |
Pixtral 12BMistral | 12B | Apache 2.0 | Sep 2024 | |
PaliGemmaGoogle | 3B | Custom | May 2024 | |
LLaVA-1.5Microsoft | 7B, 13B | Custom | Oct 2023 | |
Qwen-VLQwen | — | Custom | Aug 2023 |
57 proprietary models where the weights aren't downloadable: access is through each provider's API and billed by them. Try all of them free in the Playground.
| Actions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle NEW | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1M | Oct 2026 | |
Muse WonderMeta | $4.00 | $20.00 | 1.0M | Oct 2026 | |
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic | $0.10 | $0.50 | 1M | Oct 2026 | |
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1.1M | Sep 2026 | |
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1M | Sep 2026 | |
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic | $4.00 | $20.00 | 1M | Sep 2026 | |
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI | $0.10 | $0.50 | 1.1M | Sep 2026 | |
GPT-6 SolOpenAI | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1.1M | Sep 2026 | |
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1.1M | Sep 2026 | |
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle | $0.83 | $4.13 | 1.0M | Sep 2026 | |
Muse Spark 1.3Meta | $1.25 | $4.25 | 1.0M | Sep 2026 | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1M | Sep 2026 | |
Qwen3.8 FlashQwen | $0.15 | $0.47 | 1M | Aug 2026 | |
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle | $0.75 | $3.75 | 1.0M | Aug 2026 | |
Grok 4.6SpaceXAI | $2.00 | $6.00 | 500K | Aug 2026 | |
Muse Spark 1.2Meta | $1.25 | $4.25 | 1.0M | Aug 2026 | |
Qwen3.8 MaxQwen | — | — | 984K | Aug 2026 | |
Qwen3.7 FlashQwen | $0.030 | $0.13 | 1M | Jul 2026 | |
Claude Opus 5Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M | Jul 2026 | |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle | $0.30 | $2.50 | 1.0M | Jul 2026 | |
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle | $0.75 | $3.75 | 1M | Jul 2026 | |
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI | $0.20 | $1.20 | 1.5M | Jul 2026 | |
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | $4.00 | $20.00 | 1.5M | Jul 2026 | |
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI | $2.00 | $12.00 | 1.1M | Jul 2026 | |
Muse Spark 1.1Meta | $1.25 | $4.25 | 1.0M | Jul 2026 | |
Grok 4.5SpaceXAI | $2.00 | $6.00 | 500K | Jul 2026 | |
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic | $2.00 | $10.00 | 1M | Jun 2026 | |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | $10.00 | $50.00 | 1M | Jun 2026 | |
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M | May 2026 | |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle | $1.50 | $9.00 | 1.0M | May 2026 | |
GPT-5.5OpenAI | $5.00 | $30.00 | 1M | Apr 2026 | |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M | Apr 2026 | |
Qwen3.6 FlashQwen | $0.19 | $1.13 | 1M | Apr 2026 | |
Qwen3.6 PlusQwen | $0.33 | $1.95 | 1M | Apr 2026 | |
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai | $1.20 | $4.00 | 200K | Apr 2026 | |
GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI | $0.75 | $4.50 | 400K | Mar 2026 | |
GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI | $0.20 | $1.25 | 400K | Mar 2026 | |
GPT-5.4OpenAI | $2.50 | $15.00 | 1.1M | Mar 2026 | |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle | $0.25 | $1.50 | 1M | Mar 2026 | |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle | $2.00 | $12.00 | 1M | Feb 2026 | |
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic | $3.00 | $15.00 | 1M | Feb 2026 | |
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M | Feb 2026 | |
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle | $0.50 | $3.00 | 1M | Dec 2025 | |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | $1.75 | $14.00 | 400K | Dec 2025 | |
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | $5.00 | $25.00 | 200K | Nov 2025 | |
GPT-5.1OpenAI | $1.25 | $10.00 | 196K | Nov 2025 | |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | $1.00 | $5.00 | 200K | Oct 2025 | |
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K | Sep 2025 | |
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral | $0.40 | $2.00 | 128K | Aug 2025 | |
GPT-5OpenAI | $1.25 | $10.00 | — | Aug 2025 | |
GPT-5 MiniOpenAI | $0.25 | $2.00 | 400K | Aug 2025 | |
GPT-5 NanoOpenAI | $0.050 | $0.40 | 400K | Aug 2025 | |
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle | $0.10 | $0.40 | 1M | Jul 2025 | |
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle | $0.30 | $2.50 | 1M | Jul 2025 | |
Grok 4SpaceXAI | — | — | — | Jul 2025 | |
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle | $1.25 | $10.00 | 1M | Jun 2025 | |
Qwen VL MaxQwen | — | — | — | Feb 2025 |
The expensive mistake in either direction: using a frontier vision LLM for a job a small trained model does better and a thousand times cheaper, or spending weeks building a training pipeline for a job a VLM handles with one prompt. The decision comes down to how open-ended the task is.
If the task is fixed and repetitive (detect these products, classify these defects, count people in this camera feed), a trained detector or classifier wins on every production axis: per-image cost measured in fractions of a cent, millisecond latency, deployment on edge hardware, and consistency you can put error bars on. Vision LLMs answer the same question in seconds for orders of magnitude more money, with answers that can vary between calls.
Open-ended instructions, language output, and world knowledge are the VLM-only zone: describe this scene for an incident report, extract these fields from any invoice layout, answer whatever question a user types about an image. No trained classifier can do these, because the label space is unbounded. If the question changes per request, or the output is prose or structured text, you need the language model.
Within the family, capability tracks reasoning depth more than vision. Reading a receipt or writing alt text works on small open models at a fraction of frontier pricing; multi-step document reasoning and unusual images separate the top models quickly. Our vision benchmark on the evals page scores the models we have tested across five task types; the verdict module above names the current leader.
Mature production systems use the VLM as the reasoning layer, not the whole pipeline: a trained detector localizes at volume, OCR reads at volume, and the VLM handles the open-ended residue (judgment calls, summaries, escalations). Prototype everything with the VLM first, then move the fixed, high-volume steps to specialized models as the requirements stop changing.
The bottom line: Fixed question at volume: train a classic model. Open-ended question or language output: vision LLM. At scale, the answer is usually a pipeline with both.
On our vision benchmark across five tasks (63 models tested, updated Oct 13, 2026), Gemini 4 Argon by Google currently scores highest at 87.5%. The full ranking is on our evals page. For fixed categories in production, a model fine-tuned on your own data still often wins.
Yes. 34 of the 91 models here are open-weight (for example Qwen3.8 27B, Qwen3.6 27B, and Qwen3.6 35B A3B), free to self-host under their licenses (Custom, MIT, and Apache 2.0).
Yes. You can run 86 of them in the Roboflow Playground for free. Upload an image and compare the models' output side by side, no setup required.
This page lists all 91 vision LLMs in the Roboflow Playground catalog: 34 open-weight models you can self-host and 57 proprietary models accessed through provider APIs; 86 of them run live in the Roboflow Playground on your own images. Compare licenses, parameters, API prices, and release dates side by side, or open any model page for full details.