GPT-6 Sol is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI, released on September 22, 2026 alongside GPT-6 Luna as an efficiency-oriented tier of the GPT-6 family that began with GPT-6 Astra. OpenAI states that Sol and Luna are trained with methods similar to those used for Astra, carrying the same work on professional tasks, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment into models that run faster. Sol accepts text and image input and returns text output, and OpenAI documents a context window of roughly one million tokens together with a knowledge cutoff of April 20, 2026.
The model targets complex coding and agentic workflows and exposes a configurable reasoning effort setting with levels of none, low, medium, high, xhigh, and max, which trades latency and token consumption against answer quality. OpenAI reports results including 33.2% on AutomationBench at xhigh effort and 56.4% on Agents' Last Exam at max effort, while its reported DeepSWE and OSWorld 2.0 figures of 68.8% and 64.4% fall below those of the earlier GPT-5.6 Sol. Its vision behavior covers image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, captioning, document and chart interpretation, and text recognition.
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Model settings
Thinking level
Max output tokens
Default 65,536 · max 65,536
Sign in to adjust thinking and output length per run.
Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run GPT-6 Sol.
—
Usage
Past 30 DaysVision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across five vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026
GPT-6 Sol averages 76.9% across the five Vision Evals tasks, ranking #12 of 63 models overall.
Its weakest relative showing is OCR, ranking #18 of 47 at 66.7%.
At $0.0074 per sample it is the 44th cheapest of the 63 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 10.2s per sample makes it the 29th fastest.
Field medians: Object Detection 54.4%, Counting 63.5%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 63.6%, Reasoning 57.6%.
| Task | Score | Field (0 to 100) | Rank | Cost / sample | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection (low) | 74.7% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.1 to 75.5 | #5 of 63 | $0.011 | 15.60s | |
| Object Detection (high) | 76.4% ±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 77.4 | #6 of 31 | $0.022 | 23.63s | |
| Counting (low) | 76.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.3 to 78.4 | #11 of 63 | $0.0039 | 5.72s | |
| Counting (high) | 77.5% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4 | #12 of 31 | $0.0070 | 11.03s | |
| Identification (low) | 93.8% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8 | #8 of 63 | $0.0027 | 4.16s | |
| Identification (high) | 92.7% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8 | #8 of 31 | $0.0036 | 4.13s | |
| OCR (low) | 66.7% | #18 of 47 | $0.0077 | 9.27s | |
| |||||
| OCR (high) | 68.8% | #17 of 47 | $0.018 | 26.43s | |
| |||||
| Reasoning (low) | 72.6% ±3.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 69.5 to 76.8 | #15 of 63 | $0.0037 | 8.44s | |
| Reasoning (high) | 77.7% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.8 to 78.8 | #12 of 50 | $0.0061 | 7.37s | |
Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.
62 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all five tasks at low effort · GPT-6 Sol highlighted
GPT-6 Sol scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at both low and high effort; OCR is a single preliminary run · Methodology
View all Vision Evals →GPT-6 Sol costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens.
Pricing updated Oct 17, 2026
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
Other versions in the same family as GPT-6 Sol.
GPT-6 Sol is proprietary: the weights are not distributed, and the GPT-6 Sol license is the vendor's commercial terms of service that you accept when you call the API.
Vendor terms govern data retention, whether your inputs can be trained on, rate limits, and regional availability, and they can change with notice. Review them if you handle regulated or customer data.
Proprietary terms are set by the vendor rather than negotiated per project, and no open-source obligation attaches to your code. If you would rather deploy an open model instead of GPT-6 Sol, Roboflow's licensing page lists the models whose commercial license is included when you deploy on Roboflow.
Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project — our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.
Talk to salesThis model is proprietary. The author retains all rights, and use of the model is governed by their specific terms of service or license agreement.
Commercial use depends on the terms set by the model author. Most proprietary commercial models require a paid subscription, API key, or per-call billing. Check the provider’s pricing and terms-of-service for details.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.
Yes. GPT-6 Sol accepts image input and handles OCR, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is Object Detection at 74.7% (#5 of 63 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.
Yes. it scores 66.7% (#18 of 47 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR, which covers single readings, full transcriptions, structured JSON, and locating text with boxes. Within that, full transcriptions score 88.3%, and returning the fields of a label or form as JSON scores 83.4%.
Yes. On Vision Evals, GPT-6 Sol scores 74.7% mAP@50 on object detection (#5 of 63 at low effort) and 76.6% judge-graded accuracy on object counting.
On our benchmark's task mix, GPT-6 Sol averages $0.0074 per sample at $2.00 per 1M input and $10.00 per 1M output tokens (#44 of 63 on cost), with an average speed of 10.2s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.
On the overall Vision Evals ranking, GPT-6 Sol sits #12 of 63 at 76.9%, just behind Gemini 3.6 Flash (77.1%) and just ahead of Gemini 3.1 Pro (76.8%). See the full side-by-side: GPT-6 Sol vs Gemini 3.6 Flash.