Roboflow
Google

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash Overview

Gemini 3.8 Flash is a natively multimodal reasoning model in Google's Gemini 3 series, positioned as the speed and cost oriented Flash tier while targeting long-horizon software engineering, autonomous agents, and enterprise workflows. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents in a single request and returns text, with an input limit of 1,048,576 tokens and an output limit of 65,536 tokens. Thinking is configurable at low, medium, and high levels, and the model supports function calling, code execution, structured outputs, context caching, search and Maps grounding, file search, and computer use in preview. Image generation, audio generation, and the Live API are not supported.

On vision oriented evaluations the model reports 86.2% on CharXiv Reasoning for chart and figure synthesis and 87.8% on LVBench for long video understanding in agentic mode, alongside 90.8% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 61.6% on SWE-Bench Pro for coding. Following Gemini API conventions, it can localize objects by emitting bounding boxes as [ymin, xmin, ymax, xmax] integers normalized to a 0 to 1000 range, which supports prompt driven detection and grounding in addition to captioning, document parsing, and visual question answering. The knowledge cutoff is March 2026, though coverage in some domains reflects the January 2025 cutoff shared across the Gemini 3 family.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Interactive Demo

Model settings

Thinking level

Max output tokens

Default 65,536 · max 65,536

Sign in to adjust thinking and output length per run.

Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Details & Performance

Details

Resources

—

Vision Tasks

CaptioningChart Question AnsweringClassificationDocument Question AnsweringImage TaggingMulti-Label ClassificationOCRObject DetectionVision LanguageVisual Question Answering

Features

Foundation VisionLLMs with Vision CapabilitiesMultimodal Vision

Usage

Past 30 Days

Performance

Avg. Latency

Gemini 3.8 Flash Vision Evals

Vision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across five vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026

Overall score#7 of 63
79.8%
Avg cost / sample#38 of 63
$0.0045
Avg speed / sample#40 of 63
12.76s
Avg tokens / sample
2.1K

Strengths and weaknesses

Gemini 3.8 Flash averages 79.8% across the five Vision Evals tasks, ranking #7 of 63 models overall.

Its weakest relative showing is Object Detection, ranking #11 of 63 at 68.1%.

At $0.0045 per sample it is the 38th cheapest of the 63 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 12.8s per sample makes it the 40th fastest.

Performance profile

Field medianGemini 3.8 Flash

Field medians: Object Detection 54.4%, Counting 63.5%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 63.6%, Reasoning 57.6%.

Results by task

TaskScoreField (0 to 100)RankCost / sampleSpeed
Object Detection (low)
68.1%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.3 to 69.0
#11 of 63$0.004517.01s
Object Detection (high)
74.8%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.4 to 75.6
#8 of 31$0.02320.96s
Counting (low)
78.8%
±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 81.1
#8 of 63$0.00409.67s
Counting (high)
79.3%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
#9 of 31$0.02725.19s
Identification (low)
97.9%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0
#5 of 63$0.00167.44s
Identification (high)
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
#3 of 31$0.00378.12s
OCR (low)
72.8%
#10 of 47$0.004912.60s
Single value
73.5%
Transcription
91.3%
Structured JSON
86.1%
Text localization
26.4%
OCR (high)
78.7%
#4 of 47$0.03979.76s
Single value
70.9%
Transcription
94.1%
Structured JSON
90.9%
Text localization
58.6%
Reasoning (low)
81.2%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.8 to 81.5
#7 of 63$0.00388.98s
Reasoning (high)
84.5%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 83.4 to 85.4
#5 of 50$0.02321.81s
  • Thinking longer helps: 6.8 points higher on object detection at high effort for 5.1x the cost and 1.2x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 0.5 points higher on counting at high effort for 6.7x the cost and 2.6x the latency.
  • Thinking longer does not help: 1 points lower on identification at high effort for 2.3x the cost and 1.1x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 5.9 points higher on ocr at high effort for 8x the cost and 6.3x the latency.
  • Thinking longer helps: 3.3 points higher on reasoning at high effort for 6.1x the cost and 2.4x the latency.

Price vs. performance

Score vs. cost

Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.

62 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all five tasks at low effort · Gemini 3.8 Flash highlighted

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at both low and high effort; OCR is a single preliminary run · Methodology

View all Vision Evals →

Gemini 3.8 Flash Pricing

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.825 per 1M input tokens and $4.13 per 1M output tokens.

Input$0.825 / 1M tokens
Output$4.13 / 1M tokens
Cached input$0.083 / 1M tokens

Pricing updated Oct 17, 2026

Alternatives to Gemini 3.8 Flash

Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal language model from Anthropic and the second release in the Claude 5.5 family, following Claude Opus 5.5. It accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, operating with a 1M token context window and a maximum output of 128K tokens per request. The model uses adaptive thinking by default, allocating variable reasoning effort per request rather than exposing a manual extended thinking toggle, and its training data cutoff is June 2026. Anthropic positions it as a faster, lower cost complement to Opus 5.5 for well scoped everyday tasks, bug fixing, and producing documents, slides, and spreadsheets.On visual and agentic evaluations reported at launch, Sonnet 5.5 scores 61.6% on Chartography, a chart recognition test, compared with 15.6% for Claude Sonnet 5, and 80.1% on OSWorld 2.1, a computer use benchmark measuring screenshot driven control of a desktop environment, compared with 57.0% for Sonnet 5. It reports 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 for agentic coding. Anthropic describes it as the first Sonnet model able to complete Pokemon Red from screenshots alone, and it generates output more than 30% faster than Sonnet 5 while using fewer tokens for equivalent work.
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra is the mid-tier reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes the flagship Sol and the lightweight Luna. Introduced in a limited preview on June 26, 2026, and made broadly available on July 9, 2026, Terra accepts text and image input and produces text output, supporting vision, function calling, tool use, and agentic workflows. It is designed as a balanced option for everyday professional and production workloads — including coding assistance, document analysis, customer support, and multi-step agent tasks — where both output quality and cost efficiency matter. OpenAI positions Terra as delivering performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at approximately half the price, with a context window of around 1,050,000 tokens. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Terra scores 84.3%, matching Claude Fable 5 on that benchmark. Under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework, Terra is rated High for cybersecurity and biological capabilities, meaning it demonstrates meaningful capability in those domains without reaching the Critical threshold.GPT-5.6 introduces a new naming convention in which the generation number (5.6) is paired with a durable capability tier name (Sol, Terra, or Luna), allowing each tier to advance on its own schedule. Terra carries the API identifier gpt-5.6-terra and supports the same reasoning effort controls available across the family, including adjustable reasoning depth. The model includes prompt caching with explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life, with cache writes billed at 1.25x the uncached input rate and cache reads receiving a 90% discount. GPT-5.6 Terra is a proprietary, closed-weights model served through the OpenAI API, Codex, and ChatGPT.
Qwen
Qwen3.8 Flash
Qwen3.8-Flash is a multimodal mixture-of-experts model from the Qwen team at Alibaba, and the production counterpart of the open-weight Qwen3.8-Flash-Next preview that introduces the architecture intended for the Qwen4 family. The main model carries 125 billion parameters alongside a separate 51 billion parameter N-gram embedding table, while activating roughly 6 billion parameters per token. It accepts interleaved image and text input and returns text, handling 262,144 tokens of context natively with extension to 1,000,000 tokens using YaRN. The production configuration runs with the 1M context window by default and adds built-in tool support.Four architectural changes separate it from earlier Qwen releases: hybrid attention that pairs Gated DeltaNet for history compression with Qwen Sparse Attention, which uses a lightweight indexer to select micro-blocks of context; a Gated Residual scheme; N-gram embeddings; and training with the Muon optimizer, refined around orthogonalization accuracy and the division of parameters between Muon and AdamW. Qwen reports training cost around one ninth that of Qwen3.7-Plus, with QSA attention kernels measured up to 7.6 times faster in prefill and 4.9 times faster in decode at 1M-token context. Reported scores include 58.7 on DeepSWE 1.1, 62.5 on SWE-bench Pro, 84.5 on AndroidWorld and 95.7 on MathVision.
Z.ai
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM-5.3-Flash is the first natively multimodal model in Z.ai's GLM-5 series, a mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 320 billion total parameters and 18 billion activated per token. It routes each token through 8 of 288 experts across 45 language layers that interleave KDA linear attention with sparse multi-head latent attention, and pairs them with a 24-layer vision encoder that handles image and video input. The checkpoint declares a maximum context length of 1,048,576 tokens, ships in native FP8, and includes a multi-token prediction draft layer for speculative decoding. Z.ai reports that the hybrid attention design reduces attention computation by 3.01x and KV cache size by 4.44x relative to GLM-5.3.The model starts from a newly trained base built on a 30 trillion token multimodal pre-training corpus and adopts Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections to improve scaling efficiency. Vision is integrated into the coding and agent loop, so the model can inspect interfaces, rendered output, and images while operating across code, browsers, and graphical user interfaces. Z.ai reports scores of 84.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 63.4 on DeepSWE 1.1, 55.3 on Humanity's Last Exam with tools, and 48.8 on AutomationBench, and the model exposes low, high, and max thinking modes.
MiMo V2.6 Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the efficiency-oriented checkpoint of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6 series, a natively omnimodal foundation model that accepts text, image, video, and audio in a single model and supports a one million token context window. The language backbone is a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 309 billion total parameters and 15 billion activated per token, organized as 48 layers with 256 routed experts and top-8 routing. It uses a hybrid attention scheme that interleaves sliding window attention with global attention layers to cut key-value cache cost on long sequences, and pairs the backbone with a vision encoder, an audio encoder, and an audio tokenizer, plus a multi-token prediction module and a draft model for faster decoding.Training emphasizes large scale reinforcement learning on verifiable, long-horizon tasks, with RL compute, environment diversity, and grader compute scaled together in a single mixed run. Xiaomi reports gains during RL on SWE-bench Verified, Terminal Bench, a cybersecurity benchmark, and an internal visual coding benchmark, reflecting a focus on agentic coding, computer use, and multimodal document and screen understanding rather than single turn chat.

Other Google Gemini Flash models

Other versions in the same family as Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Gemini 3.8 Flash License

Proprietary

Gemini 3.8 Flash is proprietary: the weights are not distributed, and the Gemini 3.8 Flash license is the vendor's commercial terms of service that you accept when you call the API.

Commercial use
Permitted under the vendor terms, typically metered per token or per request, with the vendor usage policy applying to your inputs and outputs.
Modification
Not available. Gemini 3.8 Flash weights are closed, so you can configure prompts and use vendor-hosted fine-tuning where it is offered, but you cannot modify the model itself.
Redistribution
Not permitted. You cannot self-host or resell the model; you build on the hosted API instead.

Vendor terms govern data retention, whether your inputs can be trained on, rate limits, and regional availability, and they can change with notice. Review them if you handle regulated or customer data.

Do I need a commercial license for Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Proprietary terms are set by the vendor rather than negotiated per project, and no open-source obligation attaches to your code. If you would rather deploy an open model instead of Gemini 3.8 Flash, Roboflow's licensing page lists the models whose commercial license is included when you deploy on Roboflow.

Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project — our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.

Talk to sales

This model is proprietary. The author retains all rights, and use of the model is governed by their specific terms of service or license agreement.

Commercial use depends on the terms set by the model author. Most proprietary commercial models require a paid subscription, API key, or per-call billing. Check the provider’s pricing and terms-of-service for details.

License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.

Frequently Asked Questions About Gemini 3.8 Flash Vision

Yes. Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts image input and handles OCR, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is Identification at 97.9% (#5 of 63 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.

Yes, and it is one of the model's strongest vision skills: it scores 72.8% (#10 of 47 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR, which covers single readings, full transcriptions, structured JSON, and locating text with boxes. Within that, full transcriptions score 91.4%, and returning the fields of a label or form as JSON scores 86.1%.

Yes. On Vision Evals, Gemini 3.8 Flash scores 68.1% mAP@50 on object detection (#11 of 63 at low effort) and 78.8% judge-graded accuracy on object counting.

On our benchmark's task mix, Gemini 3.8 Flash averages $0.0045 per sample at $0.83 per 1M input and $4.13 per 1M output tokens (#38 of 63 on cost), with an average speed of 12.8s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.

On the overall Vision Evals ranking, Gemini 3.8 Flash sits #7 of 63 at 79.8%, just behind Gemini 3.7 Flash (80.1%) and just ahead of Qwen3.8 Max (79.3%). See the full side-by-side: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash.