Gemma 3 27B, announced on March 12, 2025, is the largest open-weight model in Google DeepMind’s Gemma 3 family. With around 27 billion parameters, it is multimodal—accepting both text and images as input and producing text outputs. It supports a 128,000-token context window and typically generates up to ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to process multi-page documents, extended conversations, or large batches of images in a single prompt.
The model is instruction-tuned in its “-it” variants for chat, reasoning, and summarization use cases, and it supports structured outputs and function calling. It is multilingual, covering over 140 languages. Deployment is flexible: the full BF16 model requires ~46 GB of VRAM, but quantization-aware training (QAT) versions in 8-bit or 4-bit reduce the footprint significantly, allowing more accessible use outside large-scale clusters. While it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance than smaller Gemma models, it remains lighter and more open than proprietary systems, making it well-suited for research, development, and fine-tuned applications.
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Captioning will run automatically
—
Usage
Past 30 DaysGemma 3 27B has not yet been evaluated on the current benchmark. The results below are from the legacy version of Vision Evals, our previous benchmark. See the current Vision Evals
| Category | Passed | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Document Understanding | 7 / 9 | 77.8% |
| Object Understanding | 10 / 14 | 71.4% |
| Spatial Understanding | 12 / 19 | 63.2% |
| Defect Detection | 9 / 15 | 60% |
| Object Counting | 1 / 10 | 10% |
Scores based on a single evaluation run · Methodology
View all legacy Vision Evals results →Gemma 3 27B costs $0.080 per 1M input tokens and $0.450 per 1M output tokens.
Pricing updated Aug 7, 2026
Estimated cost per task vs. Visual Understanding score, for this model and others ranked near it. Upper-left is the sweet spot (high quality, low cost). Based on Vision Evals (legacy) results.
9 of 10 models plotted · 1 not yet evaluated
| Model | Score | Median tokens | Est. cost / task | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 4 Maverick | 59.7% | 2.4K | $0.0005 | Compare |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 59.7% | 2.3K | $0.0092 | Compare |
| Claude Opus 4.1 | 59.7% | 2.1K | $0.040 | Compare |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 58.2% | 2.3K | $0.0030 | Compare |
| GPT-5 Nano | 58.2% | 2.7K | $0.0003 | Compare |
| Gemma 3 27B(this model) | 58.2% | — | — | — |
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B | 58.2% | 1.5K | $0.0006 | Compare |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 55.2% | 476 | $0.0005 | Compare |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | 53.7% | 301 | <$0.0001 | Compare |
| Kimi K2.5 | 35.8% | 2.7K | $0.0031 | Compare |
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
License terms and commercial-use guidance for Gemma 3 27B.
This model is released under a custom license that does not match a standard open-source identifier. Read the full license text linked from the model documentation.
Custom licenses vary widely in what they permit. Many model-specific custom licenses include commercial-use restrictions (e.g., non-commercial weights, named-user limits, or jurisdiction restrictions). Read the full license before deploying commercially.
Custom licenses are model-specific. Always check the per-model License Notes section above and the linked official license text.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.
Yes. Gemma 3 27B accepts image input, and on Roboflow's previous vision benchmark it passed 58.2% of visual understanding tasks (#51 of 77). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.
Gemma 3 27B has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals. The results on this page are from the previous benchmark.
Yes. The demo on this page runs Gemma 3 27B in the free Roboflow Playground: upload an image and see results in seconds. A free account unlocks unlimited runs.