GPT-6.1 Sol is a reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series that accepts text and image input and returns text. It is an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol positioned to approach the intelligence of the larger GPT-6 Astra model on agentic coding, computer use, and professional knowledge work. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning effort control, ranging from low settings for simple turns to maximum settings for harder tasks, and can be driven with tool use enabled or disabled. It operates over a context window of roughly one million tokens and emits up to 128,000 output tokens in a single response, which supports long-running agent loops over large codebases and multi-document collections. Audio and video inputs are not supported.
On the visual side, the model is evaluated on GDP.pdf, a benchmark that asks professional questions about complex PDF documents containing tables, charts, diagrams, and fine-print details, and on OSWorld 2.0, which measures agents operating graphical computer applications. OpenAI reports that GPT-6.1 Sol performs on par with or better than GPT-6 Sol across its image input safety evaluations, and that the share of responses containing a factual error at low reasoning effort falls from 11.4 percent to 7.7 percent.
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Model settings
Thinking level
Max output tokens
Default 65,536 · max 65,536
Sign in to adjust thinking and output length per run.
Results appear here. Add an image or pick an example to run GPT-6.1 Sol.
—
Usage
Past 30 DaysVision Evals is Roboflow's ground-truth benchmark: every model runs the same real-world samples across five vision tasks, and answers are scored against ground truth.
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 16, 2026
GPT-6.1 Sol averages 81.7% across the five Vision Evals tasks, ranking #5 of 63 models overall.
It places in the top three for Object Detection.
Its weakest relative showing is Identification, ranking #19 of 63 at 89.6%.
At $0.0068 per sample it is the 41st cheapest of the 63 benchmarked models, and its average inference time of 12.8s per sample makes it the 41st fastest.
Field medians: Object Detection 54.4%, Counting 63.5%, Identification 84.4%, OCR 63.6%, Reasoning 57.6%.
| Task | Score | Field (0 to 100) | Rank | Cost / sample | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Detection (low) | 80.8% ±0.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.7 to 80.9 | #3 of 63 | $0.010 | 19.39s | |
| Object Detection (high) | 81.6% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.1 to 82.0 | #3 of 31 | $0.022 | 32.49s | |
| Counting (low) | 78.8% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 82.4 | #8 of 63 | $0.0037 | 11.88s | |
| Counting (high) | 80.2% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 83.8 | #7 of 31 | $0.0057 | 13.44s | |
| Identification (low) | 89.6% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6 | #19 of 63 | $0.0025 | 11.77s | |
| Identification (high) | 88.5% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6 | #15 of 31 | $0.0030 | 8.17s | |
| OCR (low) | 75.8% | #5 of 47 | $0.0069 | 10.55s | |
| |||||
| OCR (high) | 75.8% | #8 of 47 | $0.016 | 29.89s | |
| |||||
| Reasoning (low) | 83.7% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 84.8 | #4 of 63 | $0.0033 | 11.65s | |
| Reasoning (high) | 88.7% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.4 to 91.4 | #3 of 50 | $0.0042 | 8.91s | |
Overall benchmark score against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.
62 models on the current benchmark · scores and efficiency pooled across all five tasks at low effort · GPT-6.1 Sol highlighted
GPT-6.1 Sol scores are the mean of 3 runs per task at both low and high effort; OCR is a single preliminary run · Methodology
View all Vision Evals →GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens.
Pricing updated Oct 16, 2026
Other models worth comparing for similar use cases.
Other versions in the same family as GPT-6.1 Sol.
GPT-6.1 Sol is proprietary: the weights are not distributed, and the GPT-6.1 Sol license is the vendor's commercial terms of service that you accept when you call the API.
Vendor terms govern data retention, whether your inputs can be trained on, rate limits, and regional availability, and they can change with notice. Review them if you handle regulated or customer data.
Proprietary terms are set by the vendor rather than negotiated per project, and no open-source obligation attaches to your code. If you would rather deploy an open model instead of GPT-6.1 Sol, Roboflow's licensing page lists the models whose commercial license is included when you deploy on Roboflow.
Do not hesitate to reach out with questions for your commercial project — our team will help you start solving business problems on the first call. See Roboflow commercial licensing for the models included in each plan.
Talk to salesThis model is proprietary. The author retains all rights, and use of the model is governed by their specific terms of service or license agreement.
Commercial use depends on the terms set by the model author. Most proprietary commercial models require a paid subscription, API key, or per-call billing. Check the provider’s pricing and terms-of-service for details.
License information is provided as a guide and is not legal advice.
Yes. GPT-6.1 Sol accepts image input and handles OCR, object counting, identification, visual reasoning, and object detection. On Roboflow's Vision Evals its strongest task is Object Detection at 80.8% (#3 of 63 at low effort). You can test it on your own image in the demo above.
Yes, and it is one of the model's strongest vision skills: it scores 75.8% (#5 of 47 at low effort) on Vision Evals OCR, which covers single readings, full transcriptions, structured JSON, and locating text with boxes. Within that, full transcriptions score 95.7%, and returning the fields of a label or form as JSON scores 89.5%.
Yes. On Vision Evals, GPT-6.1 Sol scores 80.8% mAP@50 on object detection (#3 of 63 at low effort) and 78.8% judge-graded accuracy on object counting.
On our benchmark's task mix, GPT-6.1 Sol averages $0.0068 per sample at $2.00 per 1M input and $10.00 per 1M output tokens (#41 of 63 on cost), with an average speed of 12.8s per sample across the benchmark. Actual cost depends on your images and prompts.
On the overall Vision Evals ranking, GPT-6.1 Sol sits #5 of 63 at 81.7%, just behind Gemini 3.5 Flash (81.8%) and just ahead of Gemini 3.7 Flash (80.1%). See the full side-by-side: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Gemini 3.5 Flash.