Roboflow

OCR Benchmark

The OCR task asks each model questions about the text in real-world images, from meters and digital displays to shipping labels, tickets, forms, passports, comics, and technical drawings. The questions fall into four categories. Single value questions ask for one reading, such as a meter value, a tire size, or the imprint on a pill. Transcription questions ask for all the text in a document or region, such as a passport machine-readable zone. Structured questions ask for the fields of a label, ticket, or form returned as JSON. Text localization questions ask for every piece of text together with its bounding box, such as the dimensions on a technical drawing.

47 models evaluated94 runs across effort levelsPreliminary: single run

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 15, 2026

Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
1high
88.0%
80.0%98.8%94.8%84.7%3.2K$0.02221.29s
2low
85.7%
78.3%95.5%92.6%81.5%1.5K$0.00517.70s
3high
79.9%
69.6%96.1%94.1%61.1%3.1K$0.0238.96s
4high
78.8%
71.7%91.9%90.6%59.2%3.7K$0.01010.18s
5high
78.7%
70.9%94.1%90.9%58.6%10.5K$0.03679.76s
6low
78.3%
67.8%96.7%91.5%61.0%2.7K$0.0165.94s
7low
77.8%
60.9%95.9%91.8%75.5%2.3K$0.03412.11s
8high
77.6%
59.6%97.5%91.7%76.8%3.3K$0.08439.33s
9high
77.4%
68.7%90.3%89.3%62.1%4.8K$0.01419.94s
10low
76.7%
71.7%90.0%86.8%56.2%2.5K$0.0137.39s
11high
76.0%
70.9%88.3%90.3%45.9%4.7K$0.05923.46s
12high
75.8%
56.5%96.0%90.4%76.7%3.1K$0.01629.89s
13low
75.8%
58.3%95.7%89.5%74.4%2.3K$0.006910.55s
14high
75.5%
69.6%85.4%88.1%53.3%4.5K$0.03114.36s
15high
75.3%
69.1%95.2%89.5%43.4%3.0K$0.05110.22s
16low
74.3%
67.4%93.2%90.5%40.1%3.4K$0.03412.30s
17high
74.2%
72.2%87.7%89.2%33.3%3.4K$0.07518.57s
18low
74.0%
63.9%95.2%85.4%59.0%2.3K$0.007718.12s
19low
73.9%
74.8%91.1%86.7%29.4%1.8K$0.00325.58s
20high
73.1%
68.7%90.8%83.9%47.1%3.2K$0.02618.64s
21high
73.1%
69.1%90.0%87.5%36.9%5.3K$0.01321.69s
22low
72.9%
64.3%84.7%89.2%46.5%2.7K$0.0397.94s
23low
72.8%
73.5%91.3%86.1%26.4%2.2K$0.004512.60s
24low
72.6%
67.8%88.5%82.0%52.0%1.9K$0.0108.51s
25low
72.3%
70.9%90.2%85.7%31.6%2.8K$0.0419.77s
26high
71.8%
61.7%94.8%81.6%59.6%5.7K$0.02878.42s
27low
71.8%
68.3%89.4%82.9%42.5%1.8K$0.00305.58s
28high
71.2%
66.1%88.6%82.1%46.4%3.6K$0.00639.60s
29low
70.4%
62.6%91.8%88.0%33.3%3.6K$0.008626.68s
30high
69.8%
62.2%86.8%87.2%35.2%5.1K$0.01550.96s
31low
68.8%
60.4%90.1%86.1%33.9%3.3K$0.00766.53s
32
OpenAIGPT-6 Sol
high
68.8%
47.4%91.0%85.3%68.7%3.4K$0.01826.43s
33low
68.7%
60.4%89.3%87.0%31.5%3.6K$0.008613.97s
34high
68.6%
61.7%85.1%86.7%30.7%4.9K$0.01426.58s
35
AnthropicClaude Opus 5
low
68.0%
56.1%92.7%85.2%40.5%2.8K$0.0228.49s
36high
67.5%
60.4%81.6%85.7%31.4%5.2K$0.01513.76s
37
OpenAIGPT-6 Sol
low
66.7%
45.6%88.3%83.4%65.7%2.4K$0.00779.27s
38low
66.3%
48.7%76.3%83.8%60.6%2.7K$0.00755.47s
39
AnthropicClaude Opus 5
high
65.8%
47.8%85.2%88.7%42.6%3.6K$0.04318.60s
40low
65.8%
64.3%87.5%75.8%31.9%1.6K$0.00124.65s
41high
65.5%
58.3%89.7%81.3%30.4%4.4K$0.004251.00s
42
AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5NEW
high
65.3%
46.5%94.7%85.3%45.8%4.0K$0.001012.27s
42high
65.3%
46.1%92.3%83.9%51.6%4.0K$0.04829.09s
44low
65.2%
60.9%86.8%76.3%35.9%825$0.00466.88s
45high
64.6%
63.0%87.3%78.3%20.6%2.8K$0.02521.02s
46low
63.9%
63.9%90.5%80.2%7.6%1.8K$0.00246.96s
47low
63.6%
54.4%89.5%86.4%14.8%5.7K$0.02338.94s
48low
63.6%
43.5%91.7%82.0%52.2%2.5K$0.01912.68s
49high
62.9%
51.3%87.3%79.3%37.4%2.7K$0.000815.40s
50high
62.5%
44.4%84.0%81.0%50.0%4.1K$0.001326.32s
51high
62.3%
56.1%83.8%75.7%31.7%4.5K$0.000445.77s
52high
62.1%
54.8%67.0%83.5%23.6%3.5K$0.03816.14s
53
MoonshotAIKimi K3
high
61.8%
43.9%80.4%82.9%43.4%6.2K$0.03236.90s
54high
61.7%
50.4%86.1%76.0%40.3%5.6K$0.01148.85s
55low
61.5%
53.0%70.8%82.4%24.2%3.0K$0.0259.48s
56
AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5NEW
low
61.2%
44.8%93.0%82.2%32.0%3.1K$0.00069.16s
57high
61.2%
50.9%88.7%85.7%9.4%6.5K$0.03070.49s
58low
60.7%
54.4%82.9%80.2%14.8%2.8K$0.001311.10s
59low
60.6%
50.0%89.0%84.4%11.0%3.2K$0.01118.68s
60
OpenAIGPT-5.5
high
60.6%
43.9%89.9%82.6%30.5%5.1K$0.10538.49s
61low
60.3%
53.5%86.7%75.8%23.1%1.8K$0.00097.87s
62high
60.1%
54.4%78.4%80.0%13.7%4.4K$0.003336.70s
63high
59.8%
49.1%80.9%74.9%36.8%4.4K$0.0097102.63s
64low
59.8%
41.7%80.0%78.2%47.4%2.5K$0.00049.31s
65high
59.5%
54.8%88.3%76.6%11.6%3.4K$0.01513.98s
66low
59.4%
52.2%88.6%78.3%13.1%2.7K$0.00786.54s
67low
58.9%
50.9%83.0%73.2%29.4%1.9K$0.00047.55s
68
MoonshotAIKimi K3
low
58.6%
43.0%75.1%78.1%39.3%4.5K$0.00616.35s
69
OpenAIGPT-5.5
low
58.4%
42.2%88.0%80.7%26.6%2.5K$0.02510.28s
70high
57.5%
47.8%86.1%80.9%7.0%3.4K$0.01322.48s
71low
57.1%
47.8%85.4%80.3%6.1%2.3K$0.006510.50s
72high
56.9%
37.4%80.2%77.3%41.9%3.4K$0.02121.67s
73low
56.4%
48.3%84.3%71.0%24.0%2.8K$0.001320.59s
74low
56.3%
36.1%79.9%76.8%42.3%2.6K$0.01110.54s
75high
56.0%
44.4%77.8%69.6%38.7%3.8K$0.008018.90s
76high
55.8%
47.0%78.5%79.0%6.1%7.4K$0.02733.34s
77high
55.7%
33.0%83.5%77.0%43.8%5.1K$0.004134.65s
78high
55.5%
46.5%84.1%71.4%21.6%2.8K$0.001321.86s
79low
55.4%
47.4%81.5%72.0%18.6%3.4K$0.000511.12s
80high
55.3%
50.9%72.2%72.0%14.5%4.2K$0.001324.14s
81
MistralMistral Large 4NEW
high
54.5%
38.3%75.3%76.4%28.8%11.1K$0.021187.98s
82
MoonshotAIKimi K2.6
low
54.4%
34.8%77.9%78.5%29.8%2.5K$0.002610.55s
83low
54.3%
52.2%84.4%67.3%9.9%1.8K$0.00015.20s
84
MoonshotAIKimi K2.6
high
52.5%
38.7%54.2%75.8%26.9%8.1K$0.022107.65s
85low
51.8%
29.6%75.5%73.6%39.7%2.5K$0.00118.97s
86low
51.5%
43.0%78.0%67.5%17.7%2.7K$0.00395.55s
87low
51.1%
41.3%77.3%73.6%4.1%2.3K$0.00355.44s
88high
50.4%
42.2%68.9%69.2%13.2%5.5K$0.001259.84s
89high
49.9%
40.4%59.9%70.2%16.8%4.9K$0.003458.34s
90low
49.7%
41.7%72.5%68.6%9.2%2.4K$0.000422.21s
91low
48.6%
37.0%68.2%67.7%18.7%2.4K$0.00129.41s
92
MistralMistral Large 4NEW
low
46.1%
33.5%68.9%71.7%0.0%3.2K$0.004448.82s
93
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
high
44.7%
34.8%69.3%64.3%6.1%4.9K$0.006027.71s
94
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
low
44.0%
34.4%65.2%64.9%3.4%5.1K$0.006230.11s

Score vs. cost

OCR score (Overall) against estimated cost per sample, on a log scale. Upper-left is the sweet spot: high quality at low cost.

47 models on the current benchmark · OCR task only, low effort

Example OCR benchmark tasks

Real samples from the benchmark: the image each model sees, the question it is asked, and the ground-truth answer it is scored against.

Benchmark sample: Animal Ear Tag (Single Value)

The models are asked

Read the number on the animal’s ear tag. Return only the digits.

Ground truth

7072872

Benchmark sample: Analog Electricity Meter (Single Value)

The models are asked

Read the five-dial electricity meter. Return the five-digit reading, including any leading zeros.

Ground truth

99009

Benchmark sample: License Plate At Night (Single Value)

The models are asked

Read the largest visible vehicle license plate. Return only its registration number, without spaces; keep letters, digits, leading zeros, and hyphens.

Ground truth

KA52B3713

Benchmark sample: Comic Dialogue (Transcription)

The models are asked

Transcribe the speech and thought bubbles in reading order, one bubble per line. Preserve capitalization and punctuation; skip captions and sound effects.

Ground truth

All I'm asking for is a quick audience. Guess not. Look, all I'm saying is -- All right? I knew no one was listening.

Benchmark sample: Handwritten Italian Record (Transcription)

The models are asked

Transcribe all visible text in this Italian document in reading order. Preserve the original spelling, punctuation, and paragraph breaks; do not translate or include blank ruling lines.

Ground truth

ATTI DI NASCITA Giorgio, di anni quaranta, Segretaro, e Zanalda Davide di anni ventitre, Studente, entrambi residenti in questo Comune. La comparente ha fatto la presente dichiarazione di nascita nella sua qualità di levatrice, per avere assistito il parto che ebbe luogo dalla Minoli Antonia ed in rimpiazzo del di lei marito Mazzuri Casimiro il quale trovasi a Canate per l'esercizio della sua professione. Letto il presente atto a tutti gli intervenuti l'hanno questi meco sottoscritto. Salina Domenica Zanalda Giorgio testimonio Zanalda Davide testimonio Savaglio Giovanni

Benchmark sample: Words On A Tile Board (Transcription)

The models are asked

Read the valid Scrabble words formed by the tiles, including rotated words. Return them in uppercase, one per line, in alphabetical order; keep repeated words and ignore isolated letters.

Ground truth

CORDS DOOR JAILS JURY MUCK RAN SO SOT WITTY WREN

Benchmark sample: Shipping Container (Structured JSON)

The models are asked

Extract the main shipping container’s markings as JSON with these keys: container_id, size_type_code, maximum_gross_kg, maximum_gross_lb, tare_kg, tare_lb, payload_kg, payload_lb, capacity_m3, capacity_ft3. Use strings, or null for missing values. Include the container check digit; remove spaces from its ID and omit units and thousands separators from numbers. Do not convert units.

Ground truth

{ "container_id": "BMOU5848980", "size_type_code": "45G1", "maximum_gross_kg": "32500", "maximum_gross_lb": "71650", "tare_kg": "3850", "tare_lb": "8490", "payload_kg": "28650", "payload_lb": "63160", "capacity_m3": "76.4", "capacity_ft3": "2698" }

Benchmark sample: Appliance Identification Label (Structured JSON)

The models are asked

Extract this appliance label as JSON with these keys: brand, model_number, product_number, serial_number, voltage, frequency, refrigerant, country_of_manufacture. Use strings, or null for missing values. Remove spaces within identifiers and refrigerant codes, retain hyphens and leading zeros, keep V and Hz units, and take the country only from the Made in statement.

Ground truth

{ "brand": "Electrolux", "model_number": "TR1171", "product_number": "9244811-10", "serial_number": "715-0410", "voltage": "220 V", "frequency": "50 Hz", "refrigerant": "R12", "country_of_manufacture": "SWEDEN" }

Benchmark sample: Sneaker Label (Structured JSON)

The models are asked

Extract this sneaker label as JSON: {"sku": null, "sizes": {"US": null, "UK": null, "EU": null, "CM": null}, "upc": null}. Use strings for visible values and null for missing fields. Prefer men’s sizes, copy the printed 12-digit UPC without spaces, and do not convert sizes or decode barcodes.

Ground truth

{ "sku": "AI1407GLSC.X23", "sizes": { "US": "9.5", "UK": null, "EU": null, "CM": null }, "upc": null }

Benchmark sample: Circuit Labels (Text Localization) without annotations
Benchmark sample: Circuit Labels (Text Localization) with predicted boxes and labels
AnnotatedOriginal

The models are asked

Locate and transcribe each circuit label, value, and polarity mark, including rotated labels. Use tight boxes around individual markings and LaTeX for mathematical text; skip wires and circuit symbols. Return a JSON array of {"bbox": [x1, y1, x2, y2], "text": "..."} in original-image pixels, ordered top-to-bottom, then left-to-right.

Ground truth

[ {"bbox": [404, 26, 459, 55], "text": "V_{DD}"}, {"bbox": [420, 66, 438, 84], "text": "+"}, {"bbox": [164, 82, 224, 107], "text": "M10"}, {"bbox": [642, 82, 703, 107], "text": "M11"}, {"bbox": [404, 94, 452, 124], "text": "V_{BP}"}, {"bbox": [711, 170, 755, 195], "text": "M6"}, {"bbox": [119, 174, 162, 199], "text": "M7"}, {"bbox": [425, 175, 442, 180], "text": "-"}, {"bbox": [358, 216, 402, 241], "text": "M3"}, {"bbox": [475, 216, 519, 241], "text": "M4"}, {"bbox": [185, 220, 222, 250], "text": "C_{c}"}, {"bbox": [628, 225, 664, 254], "text": "C_{c}"}, {"bbox": [254, 232, 286, 263], "text": "R_{z}"}, {"bbox": [560, 232, 593, 263], "text": "R_{z}"}, {"bbox": [787, 243, 830, 271], "text": "v_{o2}"}, {"bbox": [7, 258, 50, 286], "text": "v_{o1}"}, {"bbox": [207, 321, 249, 349], "text": "v_{i1}"}, {"bbox": [608, 321, 651, 349], "text": "v_{i2}"}, {"bbox": [342, 327, 385, 352], "text": "M1"}, {"bbox": [488, 327, 532, 352], "text": "M2"}, {"bbox": [440, 430, 485, 455], "text": "M5"}, {"bbox": [108, 451, 152, 476], "text": "M9"}, {"bbox": [707, 451, 752, 476], "text": "M8"}, {"bbox": [270, 463, 288, 481], "text": "+"}, {"bbox": [269, 484, 322, 513], "text": "V_{BN}"}, {"bbox": [271, 514, 289, 520], "text": "-"}, {"bbox": [402, 528, 449, 558], "text": "V_{SS}"} ]

Benchmark sample: Poster Typography (Text Localization) without annotations
Benchmark sample: Poster Typography (Text Localization) with predicted boxes and labels
AnnotatedOriginal

The models are asked

Locate and transcribe the poster’s text, including rotated or curved words. Use a tight box per text line or separate word group; skip decorative graphics. Return a JSON array of {"bbox": [x1, y1, x2, y2], "text": "..."} in original-image pixels, ordered top-to-bottom, then left-to-right.

Ground truth

[ {"bbox": [203, 158, 349, 495], "text": "FLOWER"}, {"bbox": [330, 177, 442, 490], "text": "POWER"} ]

Benchmark sample: Circuit Board Markings (Text Localization) without annotations
Benchmark sample: Circuit Board Markings (Text Localization) with predicted boxes and labels
AnnotatedOriginal

The models are asked

Locate and transcribe all visible markings on the circuit board and its components. Use one tight box per marking, join its lines with spaces, and skip logos and non-text symbols. Return a JSON array of {"bbox": [x1, y1, x2, y2], "text": "..."} in original-image pixels, ordered top-to-bottom, then left-to-right.

Ground truth

[ {"bbox": [39, 45, 213, 79], "text": "XP68-04A"}, {"bbox": [265, 107, 313, 135], "text": "R15"}, {"bbox": [317, 109, 365, 136], "text": "R16"}, {"bbox": [434, 155, 472, 185], "text": "U3"}, {"bbox": [477, 191, 528, 221], "text": "RM2"}, {"bbox": [411, 214, 442, 258], "text": "R50.0 D6L"}, {"bbox": [357, 248, 382, 285], "text": "R4"}, {"bbox": [484, 253, 523, 281], "text": "U2"}, {"bbox": [492, 318, 523, 338], "text": "ABD"}, {"bbox": [436, 322, 457, 351], "text": "R1"}, {"bbox": [239, 385, 295, 412], "text": "R12"}, {"bbox": [132, 394, 182, 417], "text": "R14"}, {"bbox": [133, 416, 181, 441], "text": "R13"}, {"bbox": [242, 437, 273, 461], "text": "R9"}, {"bbox": [151, 439, 187, 468], "text": "R7"}, {"bbox": [73, 445, 108, 474], "text": "R2"}, {"bbox": [476, 449, 528, 478], "text": "RM3"}, {"bbox": [225, 479, 242, 510], "text": "C7F"}, {"bbox": [461, 501, 481, 538], "text": "C2"}, {"bbox": [361, 505, 387, 545], "text": "C1"}, {"bbox": [133, 516, 172, 544], "text": "R3"}, {"bbox": [305, 522, 352, 551], "text": "RM1"}, {"bbox": [488, 522, 551, 556], "text": "1720"}, {"bbox": [261, 524, 294, 548], "text": "U4"} ]

How OCR is scored

Every question is scored deterministically against the ground truth, with no LLM judge. Single value answers must match exactly. Transcriptions are scored by character similarity, so a near miss earns partial credit. Structured answers are scored by how many JSON fields match, with missing and extra fields both counting against the model. Located text counts when a box overlaps the ground truth by more than half and its text matches exactly. The headline score is the mean over every question, and each category also has its own column. OCR results are currently a single preliminary run per model, so they carry no ±.

Every model runs the same sample set. Under the current protocol each task is run three times at each effort tier and the score is the mean over those runs, shown with its ± range in the table; models benchmarked before the protocol ran once per task and are being re-run under it. Token usage is measured from each provider’s API response, and cost per sample is that usage multiplied by the model’s published pricing. See the full methodology.

Frequently Asked Questions

Each model answers the same questions. Every answer is scored from 0 to 100 against the ground truth by a rule that fits its category, and the headline score is the mean over all of them. Because the categories have different numbers of questions, the headline is not the plain average of the four category columns.

Single value: one reading returned exactly, such as a meter value or tire size. Transcription: all the text in a document or region, scored by similarity. Structured: the fields of a label, ticket, or form returned as JSON, scored field by field. Text localization: every piece of text with its bounding box, which tests whether the model knows where text is, not only what it says.

The OCR results come from one run per model at each effort tier, while the other tasks are averaged over three runs. A single run cannot show how much a score moves between runs, so these scores carry no ± range. They may be re-run three times later.

Every task is run at two levels of reasoning effort. The low row is the model answering with minimal deliberation, the high row is the same model on the same questions allowed to think longer. Both rows are ranked together so you can see whether the extra thinking is worth its cost and latency, which the Est. cost and Speed columns show, and the effort filter above the table shows one tier at a time. Models benchmarked before the current protocol have a high-effort row for Reasoning only until they are re-run. Every other table on this site, including the overall Average, uses the low-effort pass so all models are compared on the same amount of compute.

Under the current protocol each task is run three times at each effort tier, and the score shown is the mean over those runs. The ± is half the range between the lowest and highest run, so it shows how much the score moved between runs; it is a range, not a confidence interval. Hover the ± for the run count and range. A score without one comes from a single run; models benchmarked before the protocol are being re-run under it. OCR results are currently a single preliminary run per model, so they carry no ±.

Most models in this leaderboard link to their Playground page. Click the model name to open it, then upload your own image and run it. A few models are benchmarked for comparison only and do not have a Playground page yet.