Qwen3.5 27B vs SAM 3
Compare Qwen3.5 27B and SAM 3 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection.
Compare Qwen3.5 27B vs SAM 3 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Qwen3.5 27B vs SAM 3 Comparison Table
Evals updated August 6, 2026Pricing updated August 7, 2026
| Property | Qwen3.5 27B | SAM 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | Meta |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Feb 2026 | Nov 2025 |
| Context Window | 262K | — |
| Parameters | 27B | |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Custom |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.195 | |
| Output $/1M | $1.56 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| Captioning | Demo | |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Instance Segmentation | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| OCR | Demo | |
| Open Vocabulary Object Detection | ||
| Promptable Concept Segmentation | Demo | |
| Video Object Tracking | ||
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Zero Shot Segmentation | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Zero-shot Detection | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 64.3% | Not evaluated |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0007 | – |
| Avg speed / sample | 7.38s | – |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 58.8% $0.0013 | – |
| Counting | 54.0% $0.0002 | – |
| Identification | 78.1% $0.0002 | – |
| OCR | 84.5% $0.0009 | – |
| Data Extraction | 78.3% $0.0002 | – |
| Reasoning (low) | 31.8% $0.0002 | – |
| Reasoning (high) | 61.6% $0.0065 | – |
Qwen3.5 27B vs SAM 3: Overview
Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.
Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.
Released on November 19th, 2025, Segment Anything 3 (SAM 3) is a zero-shot image segmentation model that “detects, segments, and tracks objects in images and videos based on concept prompts.” This model was developed by Meta as the third model in the Segment Anything series.
Unlike its previous SAM models (Segment Anything and Segment Anything 2), you can provide SAM 3 with the prompt “shipping container” and it will generate precise segmentation masks for all shipping containers in an image. SAM 3 generates segmentation masks that correspond to the location of the objects found with a text prompt.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAM 3 has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
Qwen3.5 27B is released under Apache 2.0, while SAM 3 uses Custom. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.