Roboflow

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen3.5-27B and Gemma 4 31B score 64.1% vs 57.7% averaged across four Vision Evals tasks (#32 and #41 of 65 models), so Qwen3.5-27B leads overall.

  • Qwen3.5-27B wins all 4 tasks, with its widest lead on counting (67.6% vs 51.4%).
  • Gemma 4 31B is about a third of the cost: $0.0015 vs $0.0043 overall average cost per sample.
  • Gemma 4 31B is faster: 34.4s vs 80.4s per sample.

Compare Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5-27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemma 4 31B
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5-27B
Run to compare this model.

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5-27B on Vision Evals

Score by taskGemma 4 31BQwen3.5-27B
Counting
51.4
67.6
Reasoning
52.8
58.1
Object Detection
47.5
50.5
Identification
79.2
80.2

Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5-27B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 8, 2026

PropertyGemma 4 31BQwen3.5-27B
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2026Feb 2026
Context Window256K262K
Parameters31B27B
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Commercial usefree for commercial usefree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.200$0.260
Output $/1M$0.400$2.60
Vision Tasks
Both support 10 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks
Overall
57.7%*
64.1%*
Quantizationsself-hosted
BF1657.7%FP857.7%QAT-W4A1657.6%hardware →
BF1664.1%FP860.9%AWQ-INT461.2%hardware →
Avg cost / sample$0.0015$0.0043
Avg speed / sample34.36s80.37s
By task
Object Detection
47.5%
±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 46.8 to 48.0
$0
50.5%
±3.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 46.1 to 53.0
$0
Counting
51.4%
±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.6 to 54.0
$0
67.6%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 68.9
$0
Identification
79.2%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 81.3
$0
80.2%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 84.4
$0
OCR––
by category
Reasoning
52.8%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 51.7 to 54.3
$0
58.1%
±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 60.3
$0

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5-27B: Overview

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B is the largest dense model in Google's Gemma 4 family, built from the same research as Gemini 3 and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license. It supports a 256K token context window with text and image input, configurable thinking mode for step-by-step reasoning, and multilingual support across 140+ languages. The unquantized model fits on a single 80GB GPU.

For vision tasks, Gemma 4 31B supports image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and can output structured bounding boxes for UI element detection, making it useful for document parsing and UI understanding. Compared to Gemma 3, it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance. It is part of a four-size family alongside the 26B A4B MoE variant and two on-device models (E2B, E4B), with the 31B dense variant optimized for output quality and fine-tuning over inference speed.

Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.

Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.