Roboflow

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 3 4B

Compare Claude Fable 5 and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 3 4B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemma 3 4B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 3 4B: Overview

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's first generally available Mythos-class large language model, released on June 9, 2026. It is built for long-horizon, asynchronous, and agentic tasks that prior Claude generations could not sustain, including multi-day autonomous coding sessions, complex knowledge work, and document-heavy analysis. The model supports a 1 million token context window with up to 128,000 output tokens per request and uses adaptive thinking as its sole reasoning mode, where the effort level is adjustable but raw chain-of-thought is never returned. Vision capabilities allow the model to parse diagrams, charts, and tables embedded in files and PDFs, and to use visual feedback to evaluate its own coding outputs against design goals. On benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Pro, the model scores 80.3% compared to 69.2% for Claude Opus 4.8, and it leads on CursorBench 3.1 for autonomous coding workflows.

Claude Fable 5 shares the same underlying model weights as Claude Mythos 5, but is deployed with safety classifiers that automatically reroute queries in high-risk domains — including cybersecurity, biology, and chemistry — to Claude Opus 4.8. These classifiers trigger in fewer than 5% of sessions on average. As a designated Covered Model, all traffic is subject to mandatory 30-day data retention to support safety monitoring. The model is available via the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry. Anthropic has not publicly disclosed parameter count, architecture details, or training data composition for this model.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.

The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 3 4B Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Fable 5Gemma 3 4B
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Mar 2025
Context Window1.0M128K
Parameters4B
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$10.00$0.050
Output $/1M$50.00$0.100
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
classificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
79.1%
37.31%
Avg Response Time21.66s16.80s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.0K
Median output tokens406
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.041
Defect Detection
86.7%(13/15)
60%(9/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
55.6%(5/9)
Object Counting
40%(4/10)
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
42.9%(6/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
26.3%(5/19)
OCR
Overall Score
89.52%
64.19%
Avg Response Time7.72s0.92s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens578300
Median output tokens15512
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.014<$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
93.9%(93/99)
63.6%(63/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
10%(1/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
86.7%(26/30)
Text Recognition
83.3%(25/30)
73.3%(22/30)
VQA & Extraction
86.7%(52/60)
58.3%(35/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology