Roboflow

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Compare Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Classification, OCR, Open Prompt, and Object Detection.

Compare Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 56.9% to 40.6%.

Overall, Claude Fable 5 averages 79.6% (#3 of 16) against 84.6% (#2 of 16) for Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is both cheaper ($0.0068 vs $0.029 per sample) and faster (5.9s vs 8.4s per sample).

Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Comparison Table

Evals updated July 10, 2026Pricing updated July 21, 2026

PropertyClaude Fable 5Gemini 3.1 Pro
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$10.00$2.00
Output $/1M$50.00$12.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
Document Question Answering
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks
Overall
79.6%
84.6%
Object Detection
40.6%
56.9%
Counting
63.5%
71.6%
Identification
100.0%
100.0%
OCR
94.0%
92.6%
Data Extraction
92.8%
94.8%
Reasoning
87.0%
91.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.029$0.0068
Avg speed / sample8.4s5.9s

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: Overview

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's first generally available Mythos-class large language model, released on June 9, 2026. It is built for long-horizon, asynchronous, and agentic tasks that prior Claude generations could not sustain, including multi-day autonomous coding sessions, complex knowledge work, and document-heavy analysis. The model supports a 1 million token context window with up to 128,000 output tokens per request and uses adaptive thinking as its sole reasoning mode, where the effort level is adjustable but raw chain-of-thought is never returned. Vision capabilities allow the model to parse diagrams, charts, and tables embedded in files and PDFs, and to use visual feedback to evaluate its own coding outputs against design goals. On benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Pro, the model scores 80.3% compared to 69.2% for Claude Opus 4.8, and it leads on CursorBench 3.1 for autonomous coding workflows.

Claude Fable 5 shares the same underlying model weights as Claude Mythos 5, but is deployed with safety classifiers that automatically reroute queries in high-risk domains — including cybersecurity, biology, and chemistry — to Claude Opus 4.8. These classifiers trigger in fewer than 5% of sessions on average. As a designated Covered Model, all traffic is subject to mandatory 30-day data retention to support safety monitoring. The model is available via the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry. Anthropic has not publicly disclosed parameter count, architecture details, or training data composition for this model.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.

The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3.1 Pro performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 84.6% (#2 of 16) against 79.6% (#3 of 16) for Claude Fable 5. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 56.9% against 40.6%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0068 per sample against $0.029. Claude Fable 5 is priced at $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output; Gemini 3.1 Pro is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $12.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.9s per inference against 8.4s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.