Roboflow

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3 4B

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3 4B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemma 3 4B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3 4B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 20, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemma 3 4B
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Mar 2025
Context Window1.0M128K
ParametersUnknown4B
LicenseProprietaryCustom
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsSee license terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.300$0.040
Output $/1M$2.50$0.050
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoSupported
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoNot listed
Video ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
61.7%
Not evaluated
Avg cost / sample$0.0014–
Avg speed / sample3.92s–
By task
Object Detection
57.5%
$0.0023
–
Counting
52.7%
$0.0007
–
Identification
84.4%
$0.0004
–
OCR (low)
65.8%
$0.0012
–
by category
Single value
64.3%
Transcription
87.5%
Structured JSON
75.8%
Text localization
31.9%
OCR (high)
71.2%
$0.0063
–
by category
Single value
66.1%
Transcription
88.6%
Structured JSON
82.1%
Text localization
46.4%
Reasoning (low)
48.3%
$0.0012
–
Reasoning (high)
68.9%
$0.0042
–

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3 4B: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model developed by Google DeepMind, released on July 21, 2026 as part of the Gemini 3.5 model family. It is the fastest model in the 3.5 series, designed for both low-latency tasks and high-throughput production workloads such as agentic search, document processing, receipt translation, and large-scale data extraction. The model accepts text, images, audio, and video as inputs, with a context window of up to 1 million tokens, and produces text output. It supports configurable thinking levels, allowing developers to tune the balance between response quality, cost, and latency depending on workload requirements.

On agentic and coding benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms its predecessor, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, including on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (54% vs. 31%), GDM-MRCR v2 long-context (72.2% vs. 60.1%), and real-world task execution as measured by GDPval-AA v2 (1140 vs. 642). It also surpasses Gemini 3 Flash on SWE-Bench Pro (54.2% vs. 49.6%) and OSWorld-Verified (74.0% vs. 65.1%). According to the Artificial Analysis Index, the model generates output at approximately 350 tokens per second. It is built on the Gemini 3.5 Flash foundation and is evaluated across reasoning, coding, multimodal understanding, multilingual performance, and long-context tasks. The model is developed under Google's Frontier Safety Framework.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.

The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.