MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash and MiMo V2.6 Pro score 52.4% vs 50.3% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#55 and #56 of 65 models), so Qwen3.7 Flash leads overall.
- Qwen3.7 Flash wins 3 of the 5 tasks, with its widest lead on OCR (54.3% vs 48.6%).
- Qwen3.7 Flash is under a tenth of the cost: $0.0001 vs $0.0011 overall average cost per sample.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is faster: 5.8s vs 9.5s per sample.
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
Compare MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash on Vision Evals
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash Comparison Table
Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 7, 2026
| Property | MiMo V2.6 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Xiaomi | Qwen |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Sep 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 1.02T total, 42B active | Unknown |
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | free for commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.435 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.870 | $0.130 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 50.3% | 52.4% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0011 | $0.0001 |
| Avg speed / sample | 9.45s | 5.77s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 42.0% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 40.9 to 43.1 | 42.8% |
| Object Detection (high) | 46.7% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.7 to 47.3 | – |
| Counting (low) | 50.0% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.6 to 52.7 | 46.0% |
| Counting (high) | 59.0% ±5.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 52.7 to 63.5 | – |
| Identification (low) | 76.0% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 78.1 | 84.4% |
| Identification (high) | 78.1% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 81.3 | – |
| OCR (low) | 48.6% | 54.3% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 49.9% | 62.3% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 35.1% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 32.5 to 37.8 | 34.4% |
| Reasoning (high) | 55.9% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 58.9 | 61.6% |
MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash: Overview
MiMo V2.6 Pro is the flagship omni-modal foundation model in Xiaomi's MiMo V2.6 series, released as open weights alongside a Flash variant and a 9B distillation of Qwen3.5. It uses a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with 1.02 trillion total parameters and roughly 42 billion activated per token, paired with a hybrid attention design that interleaves sliding-window and global attention layers to support a context window of about one million tokens. Dedicated encoders handle non-text inputs, including a vision encoder of roughly 681 million parameters and an audio tokenizer stack, so the model accepts text, images, video, and audio and returns text.
Post-training centers on large-scale reinforcement learning across thousands of interactive environments, combined with agentic grading, self-correction cold start, and a multi-prefix multi-teacher on-policy distillation stage that extends behavior to tasks that are hard to verify automatically.
Qwen3.7 Flash is the low-latency, cost-oriented tier of Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series, a vision-language reasoning model that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text. It is built as a hybrid thinking model: like the rest of the Qwen3.7, Qwen3.6, and Qwen3.5 families served through Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, it can either emit an explicit reasoning trace before answering or respond directly, with thinking behavior controlled by an enable_thinking switch that defaults to on for the Qwen3.7 generation. The model exposes a context window of roughly one million tokens and a maximum generation length of 65,536 tokens, which allows long multi-image sequences, long documents, and extended agent trajectories to be held in a single request.
Functionally, Qwen3.7 Flash targets multimodal agent workloads rather than pure chat. Reported strengths include object recognition, spatial understanding, and perception of real-world scenes, alongside visual coding, search, and computer-use style interaction where the model reads screen content and reasons over interface state. Weights are not published; the model is a proprietary endpoint positioned below Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.7 Max in the same series, and it supports function calling and tool use for agentic pipelines.