Roboflow

MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash and MiMo V2.6 Pro score 52.4% vs 50.3% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#55 and #56 of 65 models), so Qwen3.7 Flash leads overall.

  • Qwen3.7 Flash wins 3 of the 5 tasks, with its widest lead on OCR (54.3% vs 48.6%).
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is under a tenth of the cost: $0.0001 vs $0.0011 overall average cost per sample.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is faster: 5.8s vs 9.5s per sample.

Compare MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.7 Flash
Run to compare this model.

MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash on Vision Evals

Score by taskMiMo V2.6 ProQwen3.7 Flash
Identification
76.0
84.4
OCR
48.6
54.3
Counting
50.0
46.0
Object Detection
42.0
42.8
Reasoning
35.1
34.4

Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.

MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 7, 2026

PropertyMiMo V2.6 ProQwen3.7 Flash
OrganizationXiaomiQwen
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters1.02T total, 42B activeUnknown
LicenseMITProprietary
Commercial usefree for commercial usecommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.435$0.030
Output $/1M$0.870$0.130
Vision Tasks
Both support 10 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
50.3%
52.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.0011$0.0001
Avg speed / sample9.45s5.77s
By task
Object Detection (low)
42.0%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 40.9 to 43.1
$0.0014
42.8%
$0.0001
Object Detection (high)
46.7%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.7 to 47.3
$0.0030
–
Counting (low)
50.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.6 to 52.7
$0.0005
46.0%
<$0.0001
Counting (high)
59.0%
±5.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 52.7 to 63.5
$0.0016
–
Identification (low)
76.0%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 78.1
$0.0004
84.4%
<$0.0001
Identification (high)
78.1%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 81.3
$0.0012
–
OCR (low)
48.6%
$0.0012
54.3%
$0.0001
by category
Single value
37.0%
Transcription
68.2%
Structured JSON
67.7%
Text localization
18.7%
Single value
52.2%
Transcription
84.4%
Structured JSON
67.3%
Text localization
9.9%
OCR (high)
49.9%
$0.0034
62.3%
$0.0004
by category
Single value
40.4%
Transcription
59.9%
Structured JSON
70.2%
Text localization
16.8%
Single value
56.1%
Transcription
83.8%
Structured JSON
75.7%
Text localization
31.7%
Reasoning (low)
35.1%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 32.5 to 37.8
$0.0005
34.4%
<$0.0001
Reasoning (high)
55.9%
±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 58.9
$0.0026
61.6%
$0.0005

MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash: Overview

MiMo V2.6 Pro

MiMo V2.6 Pro is the flagship omni-modal foundation model in Xiaomi's MiMo V2.6 series, released as open weights alongside a Flash variant and a 9B distillation of Qwen3.5. It uses a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with 1.02 trillion total parameters and roughly 42 billion activated per token, paired with a hybrid attention design that interleaves sliding-window and global attention layers to support a context window of about one million tokens. Dedicated encoders handle non-text inputs, including a vision encoder of roughly 681 million parameters and an audio tokenizer stack, so the model accepts text, images, video, and audio and returns text.

Post-training centers on large-scale reinforcement learning across thousands of interactive environments, combined with agentic grading, self-correction cold start, and a multi-prefix multi-teacher on-policy distillation stage that extends behavior to tasks that are hard to verify automatically.

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the low-latency, cost-oriented tier of Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series, a vision-language reasoning model that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text. It is built as a hybrid thinking model: like the rest of the Qwen3.7, Qwen3.6, and Qwen3.5 families served through Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, it can either emit an explicit reasoning trace before answering or respond directly, with thinking behavior controlled by an enable_thinking switch that defaults to on for the Qwen3.7 generation. The model exposes a context window of roughly one million tokens and a maximum generation length of 65,536 tokens, which allows long multi-image sequences, long documents, and extended agent trajectories to be held in a single request.

Functionally, Qwen3.7 Flash targets multimodal agent workloads rather than pure chat. Reported strengths include object recognition, spatial understanding, and perception of real-world scenes, alongside visual coding, search, and computer-use style interaction where the model reads screen content and reasons over interface state. Weights are not published; the model is a proprietary endpoint positioned below Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.7 Max in the same series, and it supports function calling and tool use for agentic pipelines.