Roboflow

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.5 27B

Compare Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3.5 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.5 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemma 3 4B
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.5 27B: Overview

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.

The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.

Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.

Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.5 27B Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 3 4BQwen3.5 27B
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2025Feb 2026
Context Window128K262K
Parameters4B27B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.050$0.195
Output $/1M$0.100$1.56
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Object Detection
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
37.31%
71.64%
Avg Response Time16.80s1.98s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.2K
Median output tokens7
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0002
Defect Detection
60%(9/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
55.6%(5/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
40%(4/10)
Object Understanding
42.9%(6/14)
78.6%(11/14)
Spatial Understanding
26.3%(5/19)
73.7%(14/19)
OCR
Overall Score
64.19%
85.59%
Avg Response Time0.92s8.51s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens300126
Median output tokens12107
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark<$0.0001$0.0002
Focused Scene OCR
63.6%(63/99)
84.8%(84/99)
Handwritten Math
10%(1/10)
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
73.3%(22/30)
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
58.3%(35/60)
83.3%(50/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology