Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Compare Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct: Overview
Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.
The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.
Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct is a 7-billion parameter vision-language model from Alibaba’s QwenLM team, released on January 26, 2025 under the Apache 2.0 license. It is the instruction-tuned variant of the 7B scale in the Qwen2.5-VL family, designed to process multimodal inputs such as text, images, charts, documents, and video. The model enables structured outputs—including JSON for structured content and bounding boxes for visual localization. Weights are publicly available on Hugging Face and GitHub, making it suitable for both research and applied multimodal use.
Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct Comparison Table
| Property | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2025 | Jan 2025 |
| Context Window | 128K | 33K |
| Parameters | 4B | 7B |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.050 | |
| Output $/1M | $0.100 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 37.31% | 52.24% |
| Avg Response Time | 16.80s | 47.64s |
| Defect Detection | 60%(9/15) | 60%(9/15) |
| Document Understanding | 55.6%(5/9) | 77.8%(7/9) |
| Object Counting | 0%(0/10) | 0%(0/10) |
| Object Understanding | 42.9%(6/14) | 57.1%(8/14) |
| Spatial Understanding | 26.3%(5/19) | 57.9%(11/19) |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 64.19% | |
| Avg Response Time | 0.92s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 300 | |
| Median output tokens | 12 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | <$0.0001 | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 63.6%(63/99) | |
| Handwritten Math | 10%(1/10) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 86.7%(26/30) | |
| Text Recognition | 73.3%(22/30) | |
| VQA & Extraction | 58.3%(35/60) | |