Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.5-27B
Compare Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.5-27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.5-27B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.5-27B Comparison Table
Evals updated September 22, 2026Pricing updated September 25, 2026
| Property | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.5-27B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| Context Window | 128K | 262K |
| Parameters | 27B | |
| License | Custom | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.080 | $0.195 |
| Output $/1M | $0.450 | $1.56 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 70.8% |
| Quantizationsself-hosted | ||
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0043 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 80.37s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | – | 50.5% ±3.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 46.1 to 53.0 |
| Counting | – | 67.6% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 68.9 |
| Identification | – | 80.2% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 84.4 |
| OCR | – | 84.7% ±3.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.8 to 87.3 |
| Data Extraction | – | 83.8% ±1.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.5 to 85.6 |
| Reasoning | – | 58.1% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 60.3 |
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.5-27B: Overview
Gemma 3 27B, announced on March 12, 2025, is the largest open-weight model in Google DeepMind’s Gemma 3 family. With around 27 billion parameters, it is multimodal—accepting both text and images as input and producing text outputs. It supports a 128,000-token context window and typically generates up to ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to process multi-page documents, extended conversations, or large batches of images in a single prompt.
The model is instruction-tuned in its “-it” variants for chat, reasoning, and summarization use cases, and it supports structured outputs and function calling. It is multilingual, covering over 140 languages. Deployment is flexible: the full BF16 model requires ~46 GB of VRAM, but quantization-aware training (QAT) versions in 8-bit or 4-bit reduce the footprint significantly, allowing more accessible use outside large-scale clusters. While it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance than smaller Gemma models, it remains lighter and more open than proprietary systems, making it well-suited for research, development, and fine-tuned applications.
Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.
Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.