Roboflow

Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 4 31B

Compare Gemma 3 27B and Gemma 4 31B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 4 31B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemma 3 27B
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemma 4 31B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 4 31B: Overview

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma 3 27B, announced on March 12, 2025, is the largest open-weight model in Google DeepMind’s Gemma 3 family. With around 27 billion parameters, it is multimodal—accepting both text and images as input and producing text outputs. It supports a 128,000-token context window and typically generates up to ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to process multi-page documents, extended conversations, or large batches of images in a single prompt.

The model is instruction-tuned in its “-it” variants for chat, reasoning, and summarization use cases, and it supports structured outputs and function calling. It is multilingual, covering over 140 languages. Deployment is flexible: the full BF16 model requires ~46 GB of VRAM, but quantization-aware training (QAT) versions in 8-bit or 4-bit reduce the footprint significantly, allowing more accessible use outside large-scale clusters. While it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance than smaller Gemma models, it remains lighter and more open than proprietary systems, making it well-suited for research, development, and fine-tuned applications.

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B is the largest dense model in Google's Gemma 4 family, built from the same research as Gemini 3 and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license. It supports a 256K token context window with text and image input, configurable thinking mode for step-by-step reasoning, and multilingual support across 140+ languages. The unquantized model fits on a single 80GB GPU.

For vision tasks, Gemma 4 31B supports image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and can output structured bounding boxes for UI element detection, making it useful for document parsing and UI understanding. Compared to Gemma 3, it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance. It is part of a four-size family alongside the 26B A4B MoE variant and two on-device models (E2B, E4B), with the 31B dense variant optimized for output quality and fine-tuning over inference speed.

Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 4 31B Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 3 27BGemma 4 31B
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2025Apr 2026
Context Window128K256K
Parameters31B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.080$0.120
Output $/1M$0.450$0.370
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
classificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
58.21%
67.16%
Avg Response Time33.60s34.59s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens169
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Defect Detection
60%(9/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
63.2%(12/19)
73.7%(14/19)
OCR
Overall Score
84.72%
Avg Response Time11.82s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens290
Median output tokens131
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
86.9%(86/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
85%(51/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology