Gemma 3 27B vs MiMo V2.6 Flash
MiMo V2.6 Flash: 49.2% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#57 of 65 models). We have not run Gemma 3 27B through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score. Run both on your own image below.
Compare Gemma 3 27B vs MiMo V2.6 Flash live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Gemma 3 27B vs MiMo V2.6 Flash Comparison Table
Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 7, 2026
| Property | Gemma 3 27B | MiMo V2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Xiaomi | |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2025 | Sep 2026 |
| Context Window | 128K | 1.0M |
| Parameters | Unknown | 309B total, 15B active |
| License | Custom | MIT |
| Commercial use | See license terms | free for commercial use |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.080 | $0.140 |
| Output $/1M | $0.350 | $0.280 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Classification | Supported | Demo |
| object-detection | Not listed | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 49.2% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0003 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 16.34s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 37.8% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 36.4 to 38.7 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 45.0% ±2.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 42.2 to 47.1 |
| Counting (low) | – | 49.5% ±8.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 41.9 to 58.1 |
| Counting (high) | – | 64.9% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 66.2 |
| Identification (low) | – | 76.0% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 78.1 |
| Identification (high) | – | 82.3% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 87.5 |
| OCR (low) | – | 49.7% |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | – | 50.4% |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 33.1% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 31.1 to 35.1 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 58.5% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 59.6 |
Gemma 3 27B vs MiMo V2.6 Flash: Overview
Gemma 3 27B, announced on March 12, 2025, is the largest open-weight model in Google DeepMind’s Gemma 3 family. With around 27 billion parameters, it is multimodal—accepting both text and images as input and producing text outputs. It supports a 128,000-token context window and typically generates up to ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to process multi-page documents, extended conversations, or large batches of images in a single prompt.
The model is instruction-tuned in its “-it” variants for chat, reasoning, and summarization use cases, and it supports structured outputs and function calling. It is multilingual, covering over 140 languages. Deployment is flexible: the full BF16 model requires ~46 GB of VRAM, but quantization-aware training (QAT) versions in 8-bit or 4-bit reduce the footprint significantly, allowing more accessible use outside large-scale clusters. While it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance than smaller Gemma models, it remains lighter and more open than proprietary systems, making it well-suited for research, development, and fine-tuned applications.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the efficiency-oriented checkpoint of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6 series, a natively omnimodal foundation model that accepts text, image, video, and audio in a single model and supports a one million token context window. The language backbone is a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 309 billion total parameters and 15 billion activated per token, organized as 48 layers with 256 routed experts and top-8 routing. It uses a hybrid attention scheme that interleaves sliding window attention with global attention layers to cut key-value cache cost on long sequences, and pairs the backbone with a vision encoder, an audio encoder, and an audio tokenizer, plus a multi-token prediction module and a draft model for faster decoding.
Training emphasizes large scale reinforcement learning on verifiable, long-horizon tasks, with RL compute, environment diversity, and grader compute scaled together in a single mixed run.
Frequently Asked Questions
Gemma 3 27B is released under Custom, while MiMo V2.6 Flash uses MIT. In practice: MiMo V2.6 Flash: free for commercial use. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.