MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash and MiMo V2.6 Flash score 52.4% vs 49.2% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#55 and #57 of 65 models), so Qwen3.7 Flash leads overall.
- Qwen3.7 Flash wins 4 of the 5 tasks, with its widest lead on object detection (42.8% vs 37.8%).
- Qwen3.7 Flash is about a quarter of the cost: $0.0001 vs $0.0003 overall average cost per sample.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is faster: 5.8s vs 16.3s per sample.
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
Compare MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash on Vision Evals
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash Comparison Table
Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 7, 2026
| Property | MiMo V2.6 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Xiaomi | Qwen |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Sep 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 309B total, 15B active | Unknown |
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | free for commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.140 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.280 | $0.130 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 49.2% | 52.4% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0003 | $0.0001 |
| Avg speed / sample | 16.34s | 5.77s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 37.8% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 36.4 to 38.7 | 42.8% |
| Object Detection (high) | 45.0% ±2.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 42.2 to 47.1 | – |
| Counting (low) | 49.5% ±8.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 41.9 to 58.1 | 46.0% |
| Counting (high) | 64.9% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 66.2 | – |
| Identification (low) | 76.0% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 78.1 | 84.4% |
| Identification (high) | 82.3% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 87.5 | – |
| OCR (low) | 49.7% | 54.3% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 50.4% | 62.3% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 33.1% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 31.1 to 35.1 | 34.4% |
| Reasoning (high) | 58.5% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 59.6 | 61.6% |
MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash: Overview
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the efficiency-oriented checkpoint of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6 series, a natively omnimodal foundation model that accepts text, image, video, and audio in a single model and supports a one million token context window. The language backbone is a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 309 billion total parameters and 15 billion activated per token, organized as 48 layers with 256 routed experts and top-8 routing. It uses a hybrid attention scheme that interleaves sliding window attention with global attention layers to cut key-value cache cost on long sequences, and pairs the backbone with a vision encoder, an audio encoder, and an audio tokenizer, plus a multi-token prediction module and a draft model for faster decoding.
Training emphasizes large scale reinforcement learning on verifiable, long-horizon tasks, with RL compute, environment diversity, and grader compute scaled together in a single mixed run.
Qwen3.7 Flash is the low-latency, cost-oriented tier of Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series, a vision-language reasoning model that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text. It is built as a hybrid thinking model: like the rest of the Qwen3.7, Qwen3.6, and Qwen3.5 families served through Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, it can either emit an explicit reasoning trace before answering or respond directly, with thinking behavior controlled by an enable_thinking switch that defaults to on for the Qwen3.7 generation. The model exposes a context window of roughly one million tokens and a maximum generation length of 65,536 tokens, which allows long multi-image sequences, long documents, and extended agent trajectories to be held in a single request.
Functionally, Qwen3.7 Flash targets multimodal agent workloads rather than pure chat. Reported strengths include object recognition, spatial understanding, and perception of real-world scenes, alongside visual coding, search, and computer-use style interaction where the model reads screen content and reasons over interface state. Weights are not published; the model is a proprietary endpoint positioned below Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.7 Max in the same series, and it supports function calling and tool use for agentic pipelines.