Roboflow

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash and MiMo V2.6 Flash score 52.4% vs 49.2% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#55 and #57 of 65 models), so Qwen3.7 Flash leads overall.

  • Qwen3.7 Flash wins 4 of the 5 tasks, with its widest lead on object detection (42.8% vs 37.8%).
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is about a quarter of the cost: $0.0001 vs $0.0003 overall average cost per sample.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is faster: 5.8s vs 16.3s per sample.

Compare MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
MiMo V2.6 Flash
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.7 Flash
Run to compare this model.

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash on Vision Evals

Score by taskMiMo V2.6 FlashQwen3.7 Flash
Identification
76.0
84.4
Object Detection
37.8
42.8
OCR
49.7
54.3
Counting
49.5
46.0
Reasoning
33.1
34.4

Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 7, 2026

PropertyMiMo V2.6 FlashQwen3.7 Flash
OrganizationXiaomiQwen
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters309B total, 15B activeUnknown
LicenseMITProprietary
Commercial usefree for commercial usecommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.140$0.030
Output $/1M$0.280$0.130
Vision Tasks
Both support 10 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
49.2%
52.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.0003$0.0001
Avg speed / sample16.34s5.77s
By task
Object Detection (low)
37.8%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 36.4 to 38.7
$0.0004
42.8%
$0.0001
Object Detection (high)
45.0%
±2.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 42.2 to 47.1
$0.0009
–
Counting (low)
49.5%
±8.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 41.9 to 58.1
$0.0002
46.0%
<$0.0001
Counting (high)
64.9%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 66.2
$0.0003
–
Identification (low)
76.0%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 78.1
$0.0001
84.4%
<$0.0001
Identification (high)
82.3%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 87.5
$0.0003
–
OCR (low)
49.7%
$0.0004
54.3%
$0.0001
by category
Single value
41.7%
Transcription
72.5%
Structured JSON
68.6%
Text localization
9.2%
Single value
52.2%
Transcription
84.4%
Structured JSON
67.3%
Text localization
9.9%
OCR (high)
50.4%
$0.0012
62.3%
$0.0004
by category
Single value
42.2%
Transcription
68.9%
Structured JSON
69.2%
Text localization
13.2%
Single value
56.1%
Transcription
83.8%
Structured JSON
75.7%
Text localization
31.7%
Reasoning (low)
33.1%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 31.1 to 35.1
$0.0002
34.4%
<$0.0001
Reasoning (high)
58.5%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 59.6
$0.0008
61.6%
$0.0005

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash: Overview

MiMo V2.6 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the efficiency-oriented checkpoint of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6 series, a natively omnimodal foundation model that accepts text, image, video, and audio in a single model and supports a one million token context window. The language backbone is a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 309 billion total parameters and 15 billion activated per token, organized as 48 layers with 256 routed experts and top-8 routing. It uses a hybrid attention scheme that interleaves sliding window attention with global attention layers to cut key-value cache cost on long sequences, and pairs the backbone with a vision encoder, an audio encoder, and an audio tokenizer, plus a multi-token prediction module and a draft model for faster decoding.

Training emphasizes large scale reinforcement learning on verifiable, long-horizon tasks, with RL compute, environment diversity, and grader compute scaled together in a single mixed run.

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the low-latency, cost-oriented tier of Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series, a vision-language reasoning model that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text. It is built as a hybrid thinking model: like the rest of the Qwen3.7, Qwen3.6, and Qwen3.5 families served through Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, it can either emit an explicit reasoning trace before answering or respond directly, with thinking behavior controlled by an enable_thinking switch that defaults to on for the Qwen3.7 generation. The model exposes a context window of roughly one million tokens and a maximum generation length of 65,536 tokens, which allows long multi-image sequences, long documents, and extended agent trajectories to be held in a single request.

Functionally, Qwen3.7 Flash targets multimodal agent workloads rather than pure chat. Reported strengths include object recognition, spatial understanding, and perception of real-world scenes, alongside visual coding, search, and computer-use style interaction where the model reads screen content and reasons over interface state. Weights are not published; the model is a proprietary endpoint positioned below Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.7 Max in the same series, and it supports function calling and tool use for agentic pipelines.