Roboflow

GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Flash

GLM 5.3 Flash and MiMo V2.6 Flash score 55.8% vs 49.2% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#46 and #57 of 65 models), so GLM 5.3 Flash leads overall.

  • GLM 5.3 Flash wins 4 of the 5 tasks, with its widest lead on reasoning (51.0% vs 33.1%).
  • MiMo V2.6 Flash is about half the cost: $0.0003 vs $0.0006 overall average cost per sample.
  • GLM 5.3 Flash is faster: 9.3s vs 16.3s per sample.

Compare GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
Z.aiGLM 5.3 Flash
Run to compare this model.
MiMo V2.6 Flash
Run to compare this model.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Flash on Vision Evals

Score by taskGLM 5.3 FlashMiMo V2.6 Flash
Reasoning
51.0
33.1
Identification
84.4
76.0
Counting
55.4
49.5
OCR
55.4
49.7
Object Detection
33.1
37.8

Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 7, 2026

PropertyGLM 5.3 FlashMiMo V2.6 Flash
OrganizationZ.aiXiaomi
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateAug 2026Sep 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters320B total, 18B active309B total, 15B active
LicenseMITMIT
Commercial usefree for commercial usefree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.150$0.140
Output $/1M$0.500$0.280
Vision Tasks
Both support 10 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
55.8%
49.2%
Avg cost / sample$0.0006$0.0003
Avg speed / sample9.29s16.34s
By task
Object Detection (low)
33.1%
$0.0008
37.8%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 36.4 to 38.7
$0.0004
Object Detection (high)–
45.0%
±2.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 42.2 to 47.1
$0.0009
Counting (low)
55.4%
$0.0002
49.5%
±8.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 41.9 to 58.1
$0.0002
Counting (high)–
64.9%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 66.2
$0.0003
Identification (low)
84.4%
$0.0002
76.0%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 78.1
$0.0001
Identification (high)–
82.3%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 87.5
$0.0003
OCR (low)
55.4%
$0.0007
49.7%
$0.0004
by category
Single value
47.4%
Transcription
81.5%
Structured JSON
72.0%
Text localization
18.6%
Single value
41.7%
Transcription
72.5%
Structured JSON
68.6%
Text localization
9.2%
OCR (high)
55.3%
$0.0011
50.4%
$0.0012
by category
Single value
50.9%
Transcription
72.2%
Structured JSON
72.0%
Text localization
14.5%
Single value
42.2%
Transcription
68.9%
Structured JSON
69.2%
Text localization
13.2%
Reasoning (low)
51.0%
$0.0002
33.1%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 31.1 to 35.1
$0.0002
Reasoning (high)
59.6%
$0.0003
58.5%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 59.6
$0.0008

GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Flash: Overview

GLM 5.3 Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash is the first natively multimodal model in Z.ai's GLM-5 series, a mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 320 billion total parameters and 18 billion activated per token. It routes each token through 8 of 288 experts across 45 language layers that interleave KDA linear attention with sparse multi-head latent attention, and pairs them with a 24-layer vision encoder that handles image and video input. The checkpoint declares a maximum context length of 1,048,576 tokens, ships in native FP8, and includes a multi-token prediction draft layer for speculative decoding. Z.ai reports that the hybrid attention design reduces attention computation by 3.01x and KV cache size by 4.44x relative to GLM-5.3.

The model starts from a newly trained base built on a 30 trillion token multimodal pre-training corpus and adopts Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections to improve scaling efficiency. Vision is integrated into the coding and agent loop, so the model can inspect interfaces, rendered output, and images while operating across code, browsers, and graphical user interfaces.

MiMo V2.6 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the efficiency-oriented checkpoint of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6 series, a natively omnimodal foundation model that accepts text, image, video, and audio in a single model and supports a one million token context window. The language backbone is a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 309 billion total parameters and 15 billion activated per token, organized as 48 layers with 256 routed experts and top-8 routing. It uses a hybrid attention scheme that interleaves sliding window attention with global attention layers to cut key-value cache cost on long sequences, and pairs the backbone with a vision encoder, an audio encoder, and an audio tokenizer, plus a multi-token prediction module and a draft model for faster decoding.

Training emphasizes large scale reinforcement learning on verifiable, long-horizon tasks, with RL compute, environment diversity, and grader compute scaled together in a single mixed run.