Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Overview
Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.
Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.
As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.
Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B Comparison Table
| Property | Qwen3.5 27B | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | Qwen |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Feb 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| Context Window | 262K | 262K |
| Parameters | 27B | 397B |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.195 | $0.385 |
| Output $/1M | $1.56 | $2.45 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | ||
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 71.64% | 58.21% |
| Avg Response Time | 1.98s | 56.61s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 1.2K | 1.1K |
| Median output tokens | 7 | 54 |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0002 | $0.0006 |
| Defect Detection | 80%(12/15) | 66.7%(10/15) |
| Document Understanding | 77.8%(7/9) | 77.8%(7/9) |
| Object Counting | 40%(4/10) | 20%(2/10) |
| Object Understanding | 78.6%(11/14) | 64.3%(9/14) |
| Spatial Understanding | 73.7%(14/19) | 57.9%(11/19) |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 85.59% | 68.56% |
| Avg Response Time | 8.51s | 7.45s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 126 | 122 |
| Median output tokens | 107 | 20 |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0002 | $0.0001 |
| Focused Scene OCR | 84.8%(84/99) | 57.6%(57/99) |
| Handwritten Math | 100%(10/10) | 80%(8/10) |
| License Plate Recognition | 93.3%(28/30) | 100%(30/30) |
| Text Recognition | 80%(24/30) | 70%(21/30) |
| VQA & Extraction | 83.3%(50/60) | 68.3%(41/60) |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology