Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
QwenQwen3.5 27B
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 397B A17B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Overview

Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.

Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.

As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.

Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B Comparison Table

PropertyQwen3.5 27BQwen3.5 397B A17B
OrganizationQwenQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Feb 2026
Context Window262K262K
Parameters27B397B
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.195$0.385
Output $/1M$1.56$2.45
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object Detection
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
71.64%
58.21%
Avg Response Time1.98s56.61s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.2K1.1K
Median output tokens754
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0002$0.0006
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
66.7%(10/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
40%(4/10)
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
78.6%(11/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
73.7%(14/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
85.59%
68.56%
Avg Response Time8.51s7.45s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens126122
Median output tokens10720
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0002$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
84.8%(84/99)
57.6%(57/99)
Handwritten Math
100%(10/10)
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
83.3%(50/60)
68.3%(41/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology