GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Compare GPT-5.4 Mini and Muse Glimmer 30B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, and OCR.
Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B on Vision Evals
Muse Glimmer 30B scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where Muse Glimmer 30B leads 41.0% to 16.1%.
Overall, GPT-5.4 Mini averages 63.5% (#27 of 30) against 70.8% (#15 of 30) for Muse Glimmer 30B.
Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper ($0.0013 vs $0.0030 per sample), while GPT-5.4 Mini is faster (5.3s vs 8.7s per sample).
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B Comparison Table
Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 15, 2026
| Property | GPT-5.4 Mini | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | Meta |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 400K | 131K |
| Parameters | 29.6B | |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.750 | $0.350 |
| Output $/1M | $4.50 | $1.50 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 63.5% | 70.8% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0030 | $0.0013 |
| Avg speed / sample | 5.35s | 8.70s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 16.1% $0.0044 | 41.0% $0.0020 |
| Counting | 60.8% $0.0019 | 66.2% $0.0008 |
| Identification | 78.1% $0.0013 | 81.3% $0.0006 |
| OCR | 88.1% $0.0042 | 92.1% $0.0012 |
| Data Extraction | 82.5% $0.0014 | 86.6% $0.0007 |
| Reasoning (low) | 55.6% $0.0023 | 57.6% $0.0010 |
| Reasoning (high) | 62.9% $0.0081 | 62.9% $0.0033 |
GPT-5.4 Mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B: Overview
GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.
Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.
Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.
Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Muse Glimmer 30B performed better. It scores higher on all six vision tasks and averages 70.8% (#15 of 30) against 63.5% (#27 of 30) for GPT-5.4 Mini. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Muse Glimmer 30B leads with 41.0% against 16.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0013 per sample against $0.0030. GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output; Muse Glimmer 30B is priced at $0.35 per 1M input tokens and $1.50 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.3s per inference against 8.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.