Roboflow

GPT-6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Compare GPT-6 Sol and Muse Glimmer 30B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-6 Sol
Run to compare this model.
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B on Vision Evals

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-6 Sol leads 74.7% to 41.0%.

Overall, GPT-6 Sol averages 76.9% (#12 of 63) against 61.4% (#34 of 63) for Muse Glimmer 30B.

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper ($0.0013 vs $0.0074 per sample), while GPT-6 Sol is faster (10.2s vs 10.6s per sample).

GPT-6 SolMuse Glimmer 30B

GPT-6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026

PropertyGPT-6 SolMuse Glimmer 30B
OrganizationOpenAIMeta
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Aug 2026
Context Window1.1M131K
Parametersundisclosed29.6B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.300
Output $/1M$10.00$1.20
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationDemoNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
76.9%
61.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.0074$0.0013
Avg speed / sample10.20s10.60s
By task
Object Detection (low)
74.7%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.1 to 75.5
$0.011
41.0%
$0.0017
Object Detection (high)
76.4%
±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 77.4
$0.022
–
Counting (low)
76.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.3 to 78.4
$0.0039
66.2%
$0.0007
Counting (high)
77.5%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4
$0.0070
–
Identification (low)
93.8%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8
$0.0027
81.3%
$0.0005
Identification (high)
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.0036
–
OCR (low)
66.7%
$0.0077
60.7%
$0.0013
by category
Single value
45.6%
Transcription
88.3%
Structured JSON
83.4%
Text localization
65.7%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
82.9%
Structured JSON
80.2%
Text localization
14.8%
OCR (high)
68.8%
$0.018
60.1%
$0.0033
by category
Single value
47.4%
Transcription
91.0%
Structured JSON
85.3%
Text localization
68.7%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
78.4%
Structured JSON
80.0%
Text localization
13.7%
Reasoning (low)
72.6%
±3.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 69.5 to 76.8
$0.0037
57.6%
$0.0009
Reasoning (high)
77.7%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.8 to 78.8
$0.0061
62.9%
$0.0026

GPT-6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B: Overview

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI, released on September 22, 2026 alongside GPT-6 Luna as an efficiency-oriented tier of the GPT-6 family that began with GPT-6 Astra. OpenAI states that Sol and Luna are trained with methods similar to those used for Astra, carrying the same work on professional tasks, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment into models that run faster. Sol accepts text and image input and returns text output, and OpenAI documents a context window of roughly one million tokens together with a knowledge cutoff of April 20, 2026.

The model targets complex coding and agentic workflows and exposes a configurable reasoning effort setting with levels of none, low, medium, high, xhigh, and max, which trades latency and token consumption against answer quality. OpenAI reports results including 33.2% on AutomationBench at xhigh effort and 56.4% on Agents' Last Exam at max effort, while its reported DeepSWE and OSWorld 2.0 figures of 68.8% and 64.4% fall below those of the earlier GPT-5.6 Sol. Its vision behavior covers image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, captioning, document and chart interpretation, and text recognition.

Muse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.

Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.