Roboflow

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini

Compare Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-5.4 Mini side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Classification, Image Captioning, OCR, and Object Detection.

Compare Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.6 Flash
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Mini
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 56.0% to 16.1%.

Overall, Gemini 3.6 Flash averages 83.1% (#5 of 30) against 63.5% (#27 of 30) for GPT-5.4 Mini.

GPT-5.4 Mini is cheaper ($0.0030 vs $0.0032 per sample), while Gemini 3.6 Flash is faster (4.7s vs 5.3s per sample).

Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.4 Mini

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 18, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.4 Mini
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M400K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.750$0.750
Output $/1M$3.75$4.50
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Video Classification
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
83.1%
63.5%
Avg cost / sample$0.0032$0.0030
Avg speed / sample4.73s5.35s
By task
Object Detection
56.0%
$0.0041
16.1%
$0.0044
Counting
82.4%
$0.0032
60.8%
$0.0019
Identification
96.9%
$0.0015
78.1%
$0.0013
OCR
88.4%
$0.0025
88.1%
$0.0042
Data Extraction
94.8%
$0.0015
82.5%
$0.0014
Reasoning (low)
80.1%
$0.0031
55.6%
$0.0023
Reasoning (high)
80.1%
$0.0085
62.9%
$0.0081

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Mini: Overview

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is a multimodal language model from Google DeepMind, positioned as the workhorse tier in the Gemini 3.x family. It accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs with a 1 million token context window and produces up to 64,000 output tokens. The model builds directly on Gemini 3.5 Flash, incorporating developer and customer feedback to improve token efficiency, coding quality, and knowledge work performance. According to the Artificial Analysis Index, it consumes 17% fewer output tokens than its predecessor, and on some benchmarks such as DeepSWE, token reduction reaches up to 65%. It supports function calling, structured output, search as a tool, and code execution, and includes computer use as a built-in capability in the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise.

On coding benchmarks, Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 49% on DeepSWE versus 37% for 3.5 Flash, and 63.9% on MLE Bench versus 49.7%. Computer use performance on OSWorld-Verified improves from 78.4% to 83%, and knowledge work scores on GDPval-AA v2 rise from 1349 to 1421. The model carries a knowledge cutoff of March 2026 and ships with enhanced Frontier Safety safeguards covering chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and cyber offense domains, with training to minimize refusals for beneficial uses. It is a proprietary, closed-weights model available in preview through the Gemini API via Google AI Studio, Android Studio, Google Antigravity, Gemini Enterprise, and the Gemini app.

GPT-5.4 Mini

GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.

Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3.6 Flash performed better. It scores higher on all six vision tasks and averages 83.1% (#5 of 30) against 63.5% (#27 of 30) for GPT-5.4 Mini. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Gemini 3.6 Flash leads with 56.0% against 16.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GPT-5.4 Mini is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0030 per sample against $0.0032. Gemini 3.6 Flash is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $3.75 per 1M output; GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 3.6 Flash is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 4.7s per inference against 5.3s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.