Roboflow

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, and OCR.

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Mini
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.7 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash on Vision Evals

GPT-5.4 Mini scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 42.8% to 16.1%.

Overall, GPT-5.4 Mini averages 63.5% (#27 of 30) against 61.7% (#28 of 30) for Qwen3.7 Flash.

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper ($0.0001 vs $0.0030 per sample), while GPT-5.4 Mini is faster (5.3s vs 6.3s per sample).

GPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 Flash

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 18, 2026

PropertyGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 Flash
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Jul 2026
Context Window400K1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.750$0.030
Output $/1M$4.50$0.130
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
63.5%
61.7%
Avg cost / sample$0.0030$0.0001
Avg speed / sample5.35s6.32s
By task
Object Detection
16.1%
$0.0044
42.8%
$0.0001
Counting
60.8%
$0.0019
46.0%
<$0.0001
Identification
78.1%
$0.0013
84.4%
<$0.0001
OCR
88.1%
$0.0042
84.1%
$0.0001
Data Extraction
82.5%
$0.0014
78.3%
<$0.0001
Reasoning (low)
55.6%
$0.0023
34.4%
<$0.0001
Reasoning (high)
62.9%
$0.0081
60.9%
$0.0005

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash: Overview

GPT-5.4 Mini

GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.

Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the low-latency, cost-oriented tier of Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series, a vision-language reasoning model that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text. It is built as a hybrid thinking model: like the rest of the Qwen3.7, Qwen3.6, and Qwen3.5 families served through Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, it can either emit an explicit reasoning trace before answering or respond directly, with thinking behavior controlled by an enable_thinking switch that defaults to on for the Qwen3.7 generation. The model exposes a context window of roughly one million tokens and a maximum generation length of 65,536 tokens, which allows long multi-image sequences, long documents, and extended agent trajectories to be held in a single request.

Functionally, Qwen3.7 Flash targets multimodal agent workloads rather than pure chat. Reported strengths include object recognition, spatial understanding, and perception of real-world scenes, alongside visual coding, search, and computer-use style interaction where the model reads screen content and reasons over interface state. Weights are not published; the model is a proprietary endpoint positioned below Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.7 Max in the same series, and it supports function calling and tool use for agentic pipelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.4 Mini performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 63.5% (#27 of 30) against 61.7% (#28 of 30) for Qwen3.7 Flash. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Qwen3.7 Flash leads with 42.8% against 16.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0001 per sample against $0.0030. GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output; Qwen3.7 Flash is priced at $0.03 per 1M input tokens and $0.13 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.3s per inference against 6.3s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.