Roboflow

GLM-OCR vs Qwen3.5 27B

Compare GLM-OCR and Qwen3.5 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare GLM-OCR vs Qwen3.5 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
Z.aiGLM-OCR
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GLM-OCR vs Qwen3.5 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 14, 2026

PropertyGLM-OCRQwen3.5 27B
OrganizationZ.aiQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Feb 2026
Context Window262K
Parameters0.9B27B
LicenseMITApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.195
Output $/1M$1.56
Vision Tasks
Chart Question Answering
Document Question Answering
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
CaptioningDemo
ClassificationDemo
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallNot evaluated
64.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.0007
Avg speed / sample7.38s
By task
Object Detection
58.8%
$0.0013
Counting
54.0%
$0.0002
Identification
78.1%
$0.0002
OCR
84.5%
$0.0009
Data Extraction
78.3%
$0.0002
Reasoning (low)
31.8%
$0.0002
Reasoning (high)
61.6%
$0.0065

GLM-OCR vs Qwen3.5 27B: Overview

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.

Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.

Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-OCR has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.

GLM-OCR is released under MIT, while Qwen3.5 27B uses Apache 2.0. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.