Roboflow

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM-OCR

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GLM-OCR side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM-OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
Z.aiGLM-OCR
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 18, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGLM-OCR
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M—
ParametersUnknown0.9B
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.300No published price
Output $/1M$2.50No published price
Vision Tasks
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoSupported
CaptioningDemoNot listed
ClassificationDemoNot listed
Image TaggingSupportedNot listed
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Object DetectionDemoNot listed
Video ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Model Features
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Foundation VisionSupportedNot listed
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
61.7%
Not evaluated
Avg cost / sample$0.0014–
Avg speed / sample3.92s–
By task
Object Detection
57.5%
$0.0023
–
Counting
52.7%
$0.0007
–
Identification
84.4%
$0.0004
–
OCR (low)
65.8%
$0.0012
–
by category
Single value
64.3%
Transcription
87.5%
Structured JSON
75.8%
Text localization
31.9%
OCR (high)
71.2%
$0.0063
–
by category
Single value
66.1%
Transcription
88.6%
Structured JSON
82.1%
Text localization
46.4%
Reasoning (low)
48.3%
$0.0012
–
Reasoning (high)
68.9%
$0.0042
–

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM-OCR: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model developed by Google DeepMind, released on July 21, 2026 as part of the Gemini 3.5 model family. It is the fastest model in the 3.5 series, designed for both low-latency tasks and high-throughput production workloads such as agentic search, document processing, receipt translation, and large-scale data extraction. The model accepts text, images, audio, and video as inputs, with a context window of up to 1 million tokens, and produces text output. It supports configurable thinking levels, allowing developers to tune the balance between response quality, cost, and latency depending on workload requirements.

On agentic and coding benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms its predecessor, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, including on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (54% vs. 31%), GDM-MRCR v2 long-context (72.2% vs. 60.1%), and real-world task execution as measured by GDPval-AA v2 (1140 vs. 642). It also surpasses Gemini 3 Flash on SWE-Bench Pro (54.2% vs. 49.6%) and OSWorld-Verified (74.0% vs. 65.1%). According to the Artificial Analysis Index, the model generates output at approximately 350 tokens per second. It is built on the Gemini 3.5 Flash foundation and is evaluated across reasoning, coding, multimodal understanding, multilingual performance, and long-context tasks. The model is developed under Google's Frontier Safety Framework.

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.