Roboflow

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GLM-OCR

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and GLM-OCR side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GLM-OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
Z.aiGLM-OCR
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GLM-OCR: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Google DeepMind in the Gemini 3 series, based on the Gemini 3 Pro architecture. It processes text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs within a 1 million token context window and produces text output up to 64K tokens. The model targets high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads and supports visual question answering, image and document data extraction, content moderation, classification, translation, automated speech recognition, and agentic data pipelines. It exposes configurable thinking levels of minimal, low, medium, and high, which set the depth of internal reasoning applied per request and let developers balance response quality against cost and latency.

On benchmarks reported at launch, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 86.9% on GPQA Diamond and 76.8% on the MMMU Pro multimodal benchmark, and reaches an Elo score of 1432 on the Arena.ai leaderboard. According to Artificial Analysis benchmarks, it produces a 2.5 times faster time to first answer token and a 45% increase in output speed relative to Gemini 2.5 Flash. It also shows improved instruction following, higher audio input quality for automated speech recognition tasks, and support for structured JSON output used in data extraction pipelines.

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGLM-OCR
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M
Parameters0.9B
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.250
Output $/1M$1.50
Vision Tasks
Document Question Answering
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
CaptioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
68.66%
Avg Response Time1.86s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens6
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
84.2%(16/19)
OCR
Overall Score
89.96%
87.34%
Avg Response Time1.32s1.00s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens10
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003
Focused Scene OCR
91.9%(91/99)
87.9%(87/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
90%(27/30)
90%(27/30)
VQA & Extraction
83.3%(50/60)
81.7%(49/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology