Roboflow

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5.4 Nano side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Open Prompt, Object Detection, and Classification.

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5.4 Nano live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Nano
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5.4 Nano: Overview

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is the Mixture-of-Experts variant in Google's Gemma 4 family, with 25.2B total parameters but only 3.8B active per token. Built from the same Gemini 3 research as the 31B dense sibling and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license, it supports a 256K token context window with text and image input and configurable thinking mode. The "A4B" in the name refers to its approximately 4B active parameters. The MoE design makes it significantly faster at inference than the dense 31B, running nearly as fast as a 4B-parameter model while delivering roughly 97% of the dense model's quality.

For vision tasks, the 26B A4B shares the same multimodal capabilities as the 31B image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and structured bounding box output for UI element detection. The tradeoff versus the 31B dense model is a small quality reduction in exchange for much faster inference and lower hardware requirements, fitting in 18GB of VRAM at 4-bit quantization. It ranked #6 among open models on the Arena AI text leaderboard at launch.

GPT-5.4 Nano

GPT-5.4 nano is a high-throughput model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, as the efficiency-optimized entry in the GPT-5.4 family. Engineered for cost-sensitive production environments and latency-critical workloads, it features an expanded 400,000-token context window that enables the processing of large document batches or extensive logs in a single pass. The model is primarily optimized for text-heavy operations, serving as a premier engine for high-volume classification, data extraction, ranking, and the orchestration of lightweight sub-agents where speed and low per-token costs are the primary requirements.

While it supports text and image inputs, GPT-5.4 nano is designed as a text-first worker rather than a specialized visual reasoning tool. In multi-model architectures, it is best utilized for structured text tasks and simple coding sub-tasks, leaving intensive vision reasoning and UI navigation to its sibling, GPT-5.4 mini. Compared to the previous GPT-5 nano, this version provides a significant leap in reliability for structured outputs and tool calling, making it a dependable and economical choice for developers building scalable, automated pipelines that require rapid execution at the edge of the GPT-5.4 ecosystem.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5.4 Nano Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5.4 Nano
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2026Mar 2026
Context Window256K400K
Parameters25.2B
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.060$0.200
Output $/1M$0.330$1.25
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
68.66%
62.69%
Avg Response Time30.23s3.72s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2941.4K
Median output tokens214105
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001$0.0004
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
83.84%
62.45%
Avg Response Time12.05s2.59s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens290105
Median output tokens4287
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark<$0.0001$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
85.9%(85/99)
55.6%(55/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
20%(2/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
83.3%(25/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
83.3%(50/60)
66.7%(40/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology