Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5.4 Nano side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, OCR, Classification, and Object Detection.
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano: Overview
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Though the parameter count remains undisclosed, it achieves about 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified, reflecting strong coding and reasoning ability. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.
GPT-5.4 nano is a high-throughput model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, as the efficiency-optimized entry in the GPT-5.4 family. Engineered for cost-sensitive production environments and latency-critical workloads, it features an expanded 400,000-token context window that enables the processing of large document batches or extensive logs in a single pass. The model is primarily optimized for text-heavy operations, serving as a premier engine for high-volume classification, data extraction, ranking, and the orchestration of lightweight sub-agents where speed and low per-token costs are the primary requirements.
While it supports text and image inputs, GPT-5.4 nano is designed as a text-first worker rather than a specialized visual reasoning tool. In multi-model architectures, it is best utilized for structured text tasks and simple coding sub-tasks, leaving intensive vision reasoning and UI navigation to its sibling, GPT-5.4 mini. Compared to the previous GPT-5 nano, this version provides a significant leap in reliability for structured outputs and tool calling, making it a dependable and economical choice for developers building scalable, automated pipelines that require rapid execution at the edge of the GPT-5.4 ecosystem.
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 Nano Comparison Table
| Property | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Oct 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| Context Window | 200K | 400K |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.00 | $0.200 |
| Output $/1M | $5.00 | $1.25 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 58.21% | 62.69% |
| Avg Response Time | 3.15s | 3.72s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 2.2K | 1.4K |
| Median output tokens | 174 | 105 |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0030 | $0.0004 |
| Defect Detection | 80%(12/15) | 80%(12/15) |
| Document Understanding | 77.8%(7/9) | 77.8%(7/9) |
| Object Counting | 0%(0/10) | 30%(3/10) |
| Object Understanding | 71.4%(10/14) | 64.3%(9/14) |
| Spatial Understanding | 52.6%(10/19) | 57.9%(11/19) |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 61.57% | 62.45% |
| Avg Response Time | 2.13s | 2.59s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 735 | 105 |
| Median output tokens | 101 | 87 |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0012 | $0.0001 |
| Focused Scene OCR | 61.6%(61/99) | 55.6%(55/99) |
| Handwritten Math | 20%(2/10) | 20%(2/10) |
| License Plate Recognition | 66.7%(20/30) | 83.3%(25/30) |
| Text Recognition | 63.3%(19/30) | 70%(21/30) |
| VQA & Extraction | 65%(39/60) | 66.7%(40/60) |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology