Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B
Compare Gemini 3 Pro and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, and Open Prompt.
Compare Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Gemini 3 Pro is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.
Models in this comparison
Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B: Overview
Gemini 3 Pro is Google DeepMind’s flagship multimodal frontier model, built for high-accuracy reasoning and large-scale context understanding across text, images, audio, video, code, and documents. It delivers major gains over Gemini 2.5 Pro, supported by a 1M-token window and strong performance on Google-reported benchmarks such as GPQA Diamond, MMMU-Pro, and Video-MMMU.
The model excels at structured outputs, tool use, and agentic coding, enabling complex multi-step workflows and analysis of entire books, codebases, or long videos in a single prompt. Positioned as Google’s top production model, it balances advanced reasoning with broad multimodal capabilities, making it well suited for research assistants, automation agents, coding systems, and enterprise-scale document and media analysis.
Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.
The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.
Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B Comparison Table
| Property | Gemini 3 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | ||
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Nov 2025 | Mar 2025 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 128K |
| Parameters | 4B | |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.050 | |
| Output $/1M | $0.100 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | |
| OCR | Demo | |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Classification | ||
| Object Detection | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 37.31% | |
| Avg Response Time | 16.80s | |
| Defect Detection | 60%(9/15) | |
| Document Understanding | 55.6%(5/9) | |
| Object Counting | 0%(0/10) | |
| Object Understanding | 42.9%(6/14) | |
| Spatial Understanding | 26.3%(5/19) | |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 64.19% | |
| Avg Response Time | 0.92s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 300 | |
| Median output tokens | 12 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | <$0.0001 | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 63.6%(63/99) | |
| Handwritten Math | 10%(1/10) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 86.7%(26/30) | |
| Text Recognition | 73.3%(22/30) | |
| VQA & Extraction | 58.3%(35/60) | |