Roboflow

Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B

Compare Gemini 3 Pro and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, and Open Prompt.

Compare Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3 Pro

Gemini 3 Pro is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

GoogleGemma 3 4B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B: Overview

Gemini 3 Pro

Gemini 3 Pro is Google DeepMind’s flagship multimodal frontier model, built for high-accuracy reasoning and large-scale context understanding across text, images, audio, video, code, and documents. It delivers major gains over Gemini 2.5 Pro, supported by a 1M-token window and strong performance on Google-reported benchmarks such as GPQA Diamond, MMMU-Pro, and Video-MMMU.

The model excels at structured outputs, tool use, and agentic coding, enabling complex multi-step workflows and analysis of entire books, codebases, or long videos in a single prompt. Positioned as Google’s top production model, it balances advanced reasoning with broad multimodal capabilities, making it well suited for research assistants, automation agents, coding systems, and enterprise-scale document and media analysis.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.

The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.

Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3 ProGemma 3 4B
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateNov 2025Mar 2025
Context Window1.0M128K
Parameters4B
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.050
Output $/1M$0.100
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Classification
Object Detection
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
37.31%
Avg Response Time16.80s
Defect Detection
60%(9/15)
Document Understanding
55.6%(5/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
42.9%(6/14)
Spatial Understanding
26.3%(5/19)
OCR
Overall Score
64.19%
Avg Response Time0.92s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens300
Median output tokens12
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark<$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
63.6%(63/99)
Handwritten Math
10%(1/10)
License Plate Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
Text Recognition
73.3%(22/30)
VQA & Extraction
58.3%(35/60)