Roboflow

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite on Vision Evals

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on 3 of the five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 68.9% to 48.3%.

Overall, Claude Haiku 5.5 averages 69.6% (#20 of 61) against 61.7% (#31 of 61) for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper ($0.0006 vs $0.0014 per sample), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is faster (3.9s vs 11.0s per sample).

Claude Haiku 5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Comparison Table

Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 12, 2026

PropertyClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateOct 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersundisclosedUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.100$0.300
Output $/1M$0.500$2.50
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Video ClassificationNot listedSupported
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
69.6%
61.7%
Avg cost / sample$0.0006$0.0014
Avg speed / sample11.01s3.92s
By task
Object Detection (low)
65.8%
±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.1 to 66.2
$0.0006
57.5%
$0.0023
Object Detection (high)
68.2%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.2 to 69.2
$0.0010
–
Counting (low)
68.9%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.9 to 74.3
$0.0003
52.7%
$0.0007
Counting (high)
73.0%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 74.3
$0.0004
–
Identification (low)
83.3%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5
$0.0002
84.4%
$0.0004
Identification (high)
86.5%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5
$0.0003
–
OCR (low)
61.2%
$0.0006
65.8%
$0.0012
by category
Single value
44.8%
Transcription
93.0%
Structured JSON
82.2%
Text localization
32.0%
Single value
64.3%
Transcription
87.5%
Structured JSON
75.8%
Text localization
31.9%
OCR (high)
65.3%
$0.0010
71.2%
$0.0063
by category
Single value
46.5%
Transcription
94.7%
Structured JSON
85.3%
Text localization
45.8%
Single value
66.1%
Transcription
88.6%
Structured JSON
82.1%
Text localization
46.4%
Reasoning (low)
68.9%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.9 to 70.9
$0.0004
48.3%
$0.0012
Reasoning (high)
74.8%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.2 to 77.5
$0.0006
68.9%
$0.0042

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Overview

Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal language model from Anthropic and the smallest member of the Claude 5.5 family, released on October 7, 2026 after Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5. It accepts text and image input and returns text, with a 1M token context window and up to 128K output tokens per request. It is the first Haiku-class model with an adjustable effort parameter: adaptive thinking is on by default and the model decides how much to reason, steered by effort levels from low to max with medium as the default. Its training data cutoff is June 2026. Pricing starts at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100K tokens, which Anthropic reports is about 90% lower than Claude Haiku 4.5 for requests in that range.

Anthropic positions Haiku 5.5 for high-volume, latency-sensitive work such as classification, extraction, routing, summarization, and subagent tasks, and describes it as its fastest model to date at standard speed. On visual and agentic evaluations reported at launch, it scores 46.4% on Chartography, a chart reading benchmark, compared with 6.4% for Haiku 4.5 and 61.6% for Sonnet 5.5, and 72.4% on the offline subset of OSWorld 2.1, a screenshot driven computer use benchmark, compared with 15.7% for Haiku 4.5. It uses the same tokenizer as Claude Opus 4.7 and later models, so the same text counts as roughly 30% more tokens than on Haiku 4.5.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model developed by Google DeepMind, released on July 21, 2026 as part of the Gemini 3.5 model family. It is the fastest model in the 3.5 series, designed for both low-latency tasks and high-throughput production workloads such as agentic search, document processing, receipt translation, and large-scale data extraction. The model accepts text, images, audio, and video as inputs, with a context window of up to 1 million tokens, and produces text output. It supports configurable thinking levels, allowing developers to tune the balance between response quality, cost, and latency depending on workload requirements.

On agentic and coding benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms its predecessor, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, including on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (54% vs. 31%), GDM-MRCR v2 long-context (72.2% vs. 60.1%), and real-world task execution as measured by GDPval-AA v2 (1140 vs. 642). It also surpasses Gemini 3 Flash on SWE-Bench Pro (54.2% vs. 49.6%) and OSWorld-Verified (74.0% vs. 65.1%). According to the Artificial Analysis Index, the model generates output at approximately 350 tokens per second. It is built on the Gemini 3.5 Flash foundation and is evaluated across reasoning, coding, multimodal understanding, multilingual performance, and long-context tasks. The model is developed under Google's Frontier Safety Framework.