Roboflow

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-6 Luna side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, Object Detection, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna on Vision Evals

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Counting, where GPT-6 Luna leads 71.6% to 52.7%.

Overall, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite averages 70.3% (#29 of 60) against 77.2% (#18 of 60) for GPT-6 Luna.

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper ($0.0004 vs $0.0014 per sample), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is faster (2.7s vs 9.9s per sample).

Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Luna

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna Comparison Table

Evals updated September 28, 2026Pricing updated September 28, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Luna
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Sep 2026
Context Window1.0M1.1M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.300$0.100
Output $/1M$2.50$0.500
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Promptable Concept SegmentationDemo
Video Classification
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
70.3%
77.2%
Avg cost / sample$0.0014$0.0004
Avg speed / sample2.70s9.89s
By task
Object Detection (low)
57.5%
$0.0023
65.5%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.2 to 66.0
$0.0006
Object Detection (high)–
68.0%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.3 to 68.6
$0.0014
Counting (low)
52.7%
$0.0007
71.6%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 71.6
$0.0002
Counting (high)–
72.1%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 73.0
$0.0004
Identification (low)
84.4%
$0.0004
87.5%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6
$0.0002
Identification (high)–
87.5%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6
$0.0002
OCR (low)
87.4%
$0.0011
90.6%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 89.2 to 91.4
$0.0005
OCR (high)–
91.9%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.9 to 93.7
$0.0011
Data Extraction (low)
91.8%
$0.0004
83.5%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.5 to 84.5
$0.0002
Data Extraction (high)–
84.9%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.5 to 85.6
$0.0002
Reasoning (low)
48.3%
$0.0012
64.2%
±3.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.3 to 66.2
$0.0003
Reasoning (high)
68.9%
$0.0042
71.1%
±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 68.2 to 72.8
$0.0004

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model developed by Google DeepMind, released on July 21, 2026 as part of the Gemini 3.5 model family. It is the fastest model in the 3.5 series, designed for both low-latency tasks and high-throughput production workloads such as agentic search, document processing, receipt translation, and large-scale data extraction. The model accepts text, images, audio, and video as inputs, with a context window of up to 1 million tokens, and produces text output. It supports configurable thinking levels, allowing developers to tune the balance between response quality, cost, and latency depending on workload requirements.

On agentic and coding benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms its predecessor, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, including on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (54% vs. 31%), GDM-MRCR v2 long-context (72.2% vs. 60.1%), and real-world task execution as measured by GDPval-AA v2 (1140 vs. 642). It also surpasses Gemini 3 Flash on SWE-Bench Pro (54.2% vs. 49.6%) and OSWorld-Verified (74.0% vs. 65.1%). According to the Artificial Analysis Index, the model generates output at approximately 350 tokens per second. It is built on the Gemini 3.5 Flash foundation and is evaluated across reasoning, coding, multimodal understanding, multilingual performance, and long-context tasks. The model is developed under Google's Frontier Safety Framework.

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the fast, cost-efficient tier of OpenAI's GPT-6 model family, sitting below GPT-6 Sol and the larger GPT-6 Astra model that opened the generation. It is a proprietary multimodal transformer that accepts text and image input and returns text, and it exposes an adjustable reasoning effort setting so the same model can run in a low-latency mode or spend additional inference compute on harder problems. OpenAI positions it for high-volume and latency-sensitive workloads such as conversational assistants, classification, and lightweight agentic pipelines, while noting that at higher reasoning effort it handles software engineering and computer-use tasks that previously required a Sol-tier model.

The model supports a context window of roughly 1,050,000 input tokens with a maximum output of 128,000 tokens, which allows long documents, extended agent traces, and large code repositories to be processed in a single request. OpenAI describes the GPT-6 generation as improving factual reliability and adopting a more concise communication style relative to the GPT-5.6 series, and attributes the efficiency of the Sol and Luna tiers to gains in caching and inference rather than to reduced capability. Architecture details, parameter counts, and training data are not published.