Roboflow

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite score 69.7% vs 61.7% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#26 and #39 of 69 models), so GPT-6 Luna leads overall.

  • GPT-6 Luna wins 4 of the 5 tasks, with its widest lead on counting (71.6% vs 52.7%).
  • GPT-6 Luna is about a third of the cost: $0.0004 vs $0.0014 overall average cost per sample.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is faster: 3.9s vs 10.2s per sample.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna
Run to compare this model.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna on Vision Evals

Score by taskGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Luna
Counting
52.7
71.6
Reasoning
48.3
64.2
Object Detection
57.5
65.5
OCR
65.8
59.8
Identification
84.4
87.5

Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna Comparison Table

Evals updated November 12, 2026Pricing updated November 13, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Luna
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Sep 2026
Context Window1.0M1.1M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.300$0.100
Output $/1M$2.50$0.500
Vision Tasks
Promptable Concept SegmentationNot listedDemo
Video ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Both support 10 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
61.7%
69.7%
Avg cost / sample$0.0014$0.0004
Avg speed / sample3.92s10.21s
By task
Object Detection (low)
57.5%
$0.0023
65.5%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.2 to 66.0
$0.0006
Object Detection (high)–
68.0%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.3 to 68.6
$0.0014
Counting (low)
52.7%
$0.0007
71.6%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 71.6
$0.0002
Counting (high)–
72.1%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 73.0
$0.0004
Identification (low)
84.4%
$0.0004
87.5%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6
$0.0002
Identification (high)–
87.5%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6
$0.0002
OCR (low)
65.8%
$0.0012
59.8%
$0.0004
by category
Single value
64.3%
Transcription
87.5%
Structured JSON
75.8%
Text localization
31.9%
Single value
41.7%
Transcription
80.0%
Structured JSON
78.2%
Text localization
47.4%
OCR (high)
71.2%
$0.0063
62.5%
$0.0013
by category
Single value
66.1%
Transcription
88.6%
Structured JSON
82.1%
Text localization
46.4%
Single value
44.4%
Transcription
84.0%
Structured JSON
81.0%
Text localization
50.0%
Reasoning (low)
48.3%
$0.0012
64.2%
±3.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.3 to 66.2
$0.0003
Reasoning (high)
68.9%
$0.0042
71.1%
±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 68.2 to 72.8
$0.0004

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model developed by Google DeepMind, released on July 21, 2026 as part of the Gemini 3.5 model family. It is the fastest model in the 3.5 series, designed for both low-latency tasks and high-throughput production workloads such as agentic search, document processing, receipt translation, and large-scale data extraction. The model accepts text, images, audio, and video as inputs, with a context window of up to 1 million tokens, and produces text output. It supports configurable thinking levels, allowing developers to tune the balance between response quality, cost, and latency depending on workload requirements.

31%), GDM-MRCR v2 long-context (72.2% vs. 60.1%), and real-world task execution as measured by GDPval-AA v2 (1140 vs. 642). 65.1%). According to the Artificial Analysis Index, the model generates output at approximately 350 tokens per second. It is built on the Gemini 3.5 Flash foundation and is evaluated across reasoning, coding, multimodal understanding, multilingual performance, and long-context tasks. The model is developed under Google's Frontier Safety Framework.

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the fast, cost-efficient tier of OpenAI's GPT-6 model family, sitting below GPT-6 Sol and the larger GPT-6 Astra model that opened the generation. It is a proprietary multimodal transformer that accepts text and image input and returns text, and it exposes an adjustable reasoning effort setting so the same model can run in a low-latency mode or spend additional inference compute on harder problems. OpenAI positions it for high-volume and latency-sensitive workloads such as conversational assistants, classification, and lightweight agentic pipelines, while noting that at higher reasoning effort it handles software engineering and computer-use tasks that previously required a Sol-tier model.

The model supports a context window of roughly 1,050,000 input tokens with a maximum output of 128,000 tokens, which allows long documents, extended agent traces, and large code repositories to be processed in a single request. OpenAI describes the GPT-6 generation as improving factual reliability and adopting a more concise communication style relative to the GPT-5.6 series, and attributes the efficiency of the Sol and Luna tiers to gains in caching and inference rather than to reduced capability. Architecture details, parameter counts, and training data are not published.