Roboflow

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.6 Sol side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Object Detection.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Identification, where Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 100.0% to 81.3%.

Overall, Gemini 3.1 Pro averages 83.1% (#3 of 25) against 76.9% (#9 of 25) for GPT-5.6 Sol.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is both cheaper ($0.0093 vs $0.025 per sample) and faster (7.8s vs 11.7s per sample).

Gemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.6 Sol

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol Comparison Table

Evals updated August 6, 2026Pricing updated August 11, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.6 Sol
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.0M1.5M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$5.00
Output $/1M$12.00$30.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
83.1%
76.9%
Avg cost / sample$0.0093$0.025
Avg speed / sample7.81s11.72s
By task
Object Detection
67.4%
$0.010
68.2%
$0.045
Counting
71.6%
$0.0071
73.0%
$0.013
Identification
100.0%
$0.0070
81.3%
$0.0070
OCR
92.6%
$0.0066
90.7%
$0.032
Data Extraction
94.8%
$0.0063
82.5%
$0.0085
Reasoning (low)
72.2%
$0.012
65.6%
$0.011
Reasoning (high)
74.8%
$0.021
72.2%
$0.016

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.

The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.

GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Terra (a balanced everyday-work tier) and Luna (a fast, cost-efficient tier). Sol is designed for demanding reasoning, long-horizon agentic workflows, software engineering, computer use, scientific research, and cybersecurity tasks. It introduces two new capability modes: a "max" reasoning effort setting that allocates additional compute time for difficult problems, and an "ultra" mode that coordinates multiple subagents in parallel to accelerate complex, multi-step work. The model supports native multimodal input, allowing it to process screenshots, diagrams, charts, documents, and photographs alongside text. A reported context window of approximately 1.5 million tokens enables processing of large codebases, lengthy research documents, and extended agentic sessions.

GPT-5.6 Sol was announced on June 26, 2026, initially in a limited preview for trusted partners, and reached general availability on July 9, 2026. On the Agents' Last Exam benchmark, which evaluates long-running professional workflows across 55 fields, Sol scores 53.6. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, which tests command-line agentic coding workflows, Sol Ultra achieves 91.9%. The model also demonstrates gains in life sciences evaluations, including long-horizon genomics and quantitative biology analyses. OpenAI paired the release with its most extensive safety evaluation to date, combining human red teaming with large-scale automated testing, and classified Sol as High capability in both cybersecurity and biological risk under its Preparedness Framework, though it does not cross the Critical threshold in either category.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3.1 Pro performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 83.1% (#3 of 25) against 76.9% (#9 of 25) for GPT-5.6 Sol. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Identification benchmark, Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 100.0% against 81.3%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0093 per sample against $0.025. Gemini 3.1 Pro is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $12.00 per 1M output; GPT-5.6 Sol is priced at $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $30.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 7.8s per inference against 11.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.