GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3
Compare GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K3 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, Object Detection, Open Prompt, and Classification.
Compare GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3 on Vision Evals
GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher on 3 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Counting, where GPT-5.6 Sol leads 73.0% to 46.0%.
Overall, GPT-5.6 Sol averages 76.9% (#9 of 25) against 66.5% (#17 of 25) for Kimi K3.
Kimi K3 is cheaper ($0.011 vs $0.025 per sample), while GPT-5.6 Sol is faster (11.7s vs 12.7s per sample).
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3 Comparison Table
Evals updated August 6, 2026Pricing updated August 11, 2026
| Property | GPT-5.6 Sol | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jul 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.5M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 2.8T | |
| License | Proprietary | Modified MIT |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $5.00 | $3.00 |
| Output $/1M | $30.00 | $15.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 76.9% | 66.5% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.025 | $0.011 |
| Avg speed / sample | 11.72s | 12.71s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 68.2% $0.045 | 51.9% $0.020 |
| Counting | 73.0% $0.013 | 46.0% $0.0046 |
| Identification | 81.3% $0.0070 | 81.3% $0.0041 |
| OCR | 90.7% $0.032 | 93.0% $0.0094 |
| Data Extraction | 82.5% $0.0085 | 84.5% $0.0046 |
| Reasoning (low) | 65.6% $0.011 | 42.4% $0.0044 |
| Reasoning (high) | 72.2% $0.016 | 74.2% $0.037 |
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3: Overview
GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Terra (a balanced everyday-work tier) and Luna (a fast, cost-efficient tier). Sol is designed for demanding reasoning, long-horizon agentic workflows, software engineering, computer use, scientific research, and cybersecurity tasks. It introduces two new capability modes: a "max" reasoning effort setting that allocates additional compute time for difficult problems, and an "ultra" mode that coordinates multiple subagents in parallel to accelerate complex, multi-step work. The model supports native multimodal input, allowing it to process screenshots, diagrams, charts, documents, and photographs alongside text. A reported context window of approximately 1.5 million tokens enables processing of large codebases, lengthy research documents, and extended agentic sessions.
GPT-5.6 Sol was announced on June 26, 2026, initially in a limited preview for trusted partners, and reached general availability on July 9, 2026. On the Agents' Last Exam benchmark, which evaluates long-running professional workflows across 55 fields, Sol scores 53.6. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, which tests command-line agentic coding workflows, Sol Ultra achieves 91.9%. The model also demonstrates gains in life sciences evaluations, including long-horizon genomics and quantitative biology analyses. OpenAI paired the release with its most extensive safety evaluation to date, combining human red teaming with large-scale automated testing, and classified Sol as High capability in both cybersecurity and biological risk under its Preparedness Framework, though it does not cross the Critical threshold in either category.
Kimi K3 is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts large language model developed by Moonshot AI, with 2.8 trillion total parameters and a 1-million-token context window. The model activates 16 out of 896 experts per token using the Stable LatentMoE framework, and is built on two architectural innovations: Kimi Delta Attention (KDA), a hybrid linear attention mechanism that enables up to 6.3x faster decoding in long-context settings, and Attention Residuals (AttnRes), which selectively retrieves representations across model depth and delivers roughly 25% higher training efficiency. Together with refined training and data recipes, these structural advances yield approximately 2.5x better overall scaling efficiency compared to its predecessor Kimi K2. The model applies quantization-aware training from the supervised fine-tuning stage onward, using MXFP4 weights with MXFP8 activations for hardware compatibility. Thinking mode is always enabled at launch, with reasoning effort configurable via the reasoning_effort field.
Kimi K3 supports native visual understanding alongside text, accepting image inputs for tasks that combine software engineering and visual reasoning. It targets long-horizon coding, knowledge work, and agentic workflows, and ships in two variants: K3 Max for general chat and agent tasks, and K3 Swarm Max for large-scale parallel processing across many coordinated sub-agents. The model is compatible with the OpenAI SDK via an OpenAI-compatible API. Full model weights are scheduled for release by July 27, 2026 under a Modified MIT license, following the open-weight pattern established by the Kimi K2 model family. A technical report with full architecture, training, and evaluation details is expected to accompany the weights release.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.6 Sol performed better. It scores higher on 3 of the six vision tasks and averages 76.9% (#9 of 25) against 66.5% (#17 of 25) for Kimi K3. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
Yes. On the Vision Evals Counting benchmark, GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 73.0% against 46.0%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
Kimi K3 is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.011 per sample against $0.025. GPT-5.6 Sol is priced at $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $30.00 per 1M output; Kimi K3 is priced at $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
GPT-5.6 Sol is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 11.7s per inference against 12.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for OCR and image captioning in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.