Roboflow

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2.5

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro and Kimi K2.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro
Run to compare this model.
MoonshotAIKimi K2.5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

MoonshotAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2.5 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 20, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.1 ProKimi K2.5
OrganizationGoogleMoonshot AI
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Jan 2026
Context Window1.0M256K
ParametersUnknown1T
LicenseProprietaryModified MIT
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsSee license terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.500
Output $/1M$12.00$2.50
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoSupported
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
76.8%
Not evaluated
Avg cost / sample$0.010–
Avg speed / sample8.44s–
By task
Object Detection
67.4%
$0.010
–
Counting
71.6%
$0.0071
–
Identification
100.0%
$0.0070
–
OCR (low)
72.6%
$0.010
–
by category
Single value
67.8%
Transcription
88.5%
Structured JSON
82.0%
Text localization
52.0%
OCR (high)
73.1%
$0.026
–
by category
Single value
68.7%
Transcription
90.8%
Structured JSON
83.9%
Text localization
47.1%
Reasoning (low)
72.2%
$0.012
–
Reasoning (high)
74.8%
$0.021
–

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2.5: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.

The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.

Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is a frontier-scale multimodal AI model developed by Moonshot AI and released on January 27, 2026. As a significant advancement within the Kimi K2 family, it utilizes a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 1 trillion total parameters (32 billion active per inference) and a massive 256K-token context window. The model features native multimodal integration via a 400M-parameter MoonViT encoder, allowing it to process text, images, and video frames simultaneously. Built for both speed and depth, it offers "Instant" and "Thinking" modes, the latter of which excels at expert-level reasoning, scoring 50.2% on the Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE) benchmark when equipped with tools.

The model is released under a Modified MIT License, which remains open-weight but requires attribution for high-revenue commercial entities. It introduces an "Agent Swarm" paradigm capable of coordinating up to 100 specialized sub-agents for parallel workflows, significantly reducing latency in complex research tasks. For vision tasks, Kimi K2.5 demonstrates strong autonomous visual debugging capabilities, where it can inspect its own generated UI outputs against visual specifications to iteratively refine frontend code. This makes it a powerful choice for developers testing automated UI reconstruction, high-fidelity OCR document processing, and multi-step agentic research grounded in complex visual data.