Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-OCR
Gemini 3.1 Pro: 76.8% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#14 of 65 models). We have not run GLM-OCR through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score. Run both on your own image below.
Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-OCR live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table
Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 1, 2026
| Property | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GLM-OCR |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Z.ai | |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Feb 2026 | Mar 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | — |
| Parameters | Unknown | 0.9B |
| License | Proprietary | MIT |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | free for commercial use |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | No published price |
| Output $/1M | $12.00 | No published price |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Supported |
| Captioning | Demo | Not listed |
| Classification | Demo | Not listed |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Not listed |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Not listed |
| Object Detection | Demo | Not listed |
Both support 4 more tasks | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Not listed |
Both support 2 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 76.8% | Not evaluated |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.010 | – |
| Avg speed / sample | 8.44s | – |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 67.4% | – |
| Counting | 71.6% | – |
| Identification | 100.0% | – |
| OCR (low) | 72.6% | – |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | 73.1% | – |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | 72.2% | – |
| Reasoning (high) | 74.8% | – |
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-OCR: Overview
Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.
The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.
GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.
At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.