Roboflow

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-OCR

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro and GLM-OCR side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro
Run to compare this model.
Z.aiGLM-OCR
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-OCR: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.

The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.1 ProGLM-OCR
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M
Parameters0.9B
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00
Output $/1M$12.00
Vision Tasks
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
CaptioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 66 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
75.76%
Avg Response Time6.13s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens11
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0024
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
44.4%(4/9)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
73.7%(14/19)
OCR
Overall Score
89.52%
87.34%
Avg Response Time3.11s1.00s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens12
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0024
Focused Scene OCR
94.9%(94/99)
87.9%(87/99)
Handwritten Math
90%(9/10)
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
90%(27/30)
VQA & Extraction
81.7%(49/60)
81.7%(49/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology