Roboflow

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok 4 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.
GrokGrok 4
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Grok

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

Grok 4

Grok 4, released by xAI on July 9, 2025, is the fourth-generation model in the Grok family and the most advanced to date. It is multimodal, supporting text, vision, tool use, and real-time web search, with a reported 256,000-token context window for long-form reasoning and document analysis. Its training data extends through November 2024, making it the most up-to-date Grok model at launch.

The lineup includes Grok 4 Generalist for broad tasks, Grok 4 Heavy for higher-capacity reasoning, and Grok 4 Code optimized for programming and debugging. A notable feature is its always-on “Think” mode, designed for deeper multi-step reasoning. While xAI has not disclosed parameter counts, Grok 4 is positioned to compete with frontier models like GPT-5 and Claude 4, balancing real-time knowledge via web integration with structured tool use. It is best suited for coding, complex reasoning, and multimodal AI assistants.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4 Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGrok 4
OrganizationGooglexAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Jul 2025
Context Window1.0M256K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.25
Output $/1M$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
52.24%
Avg Response Time11.87s85.24s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens565
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0060
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
44.4%(4/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
78.6%(11/14)
57.1%(8/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
52.6%(10/19)
OCR
Overall Score
78.6%
Avg Response Time4.91s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens290
Median output tokens323
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0036
Focused Scene OCR
78.8%(78/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
73.3%(22/30)
VQA & Extraction
75%(45/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology