Roboflow

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on Vision Evals

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads 52.1% to 33.7%.

Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro averages 66.0% (#22 of 30) against 65.8% (#23 of 30) for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is cheaper ($0.0006 vs $0.0050 per sample), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is faster (6.1s vs 9.2s per sample).

Gemini 2.5 ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 15, 2026

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Sep 2025
Context Window1.0M256K
Parameters235B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.25$0.260
Output $/1M$10.00$1.04
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
66.0%
65.8%
Avg cost / sample$0.0050$0.0006
Avg speed / sample6.11s9.17s
By task
Object Detection
33.7%
$0.010
52.1%
$0.0011
Counting
52.7%
$0.0012
47.3%
$0.0003
Identification
93.8%
$0.0012
90.6%
$0.0003
OCR
88.8%
$0.0047
88.1%
$0.0007
Data Extraction
84.5%
$0.0013
86.6%
$0.0003
Reasoning (low)
42.4%
$0.0013
29.8%
$0.0003
Reasoning (high)
62.3%
$0.011
33.8%
$0.0003

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is a flagship multimodal vision-language model developed by Qwen (Alibaba Cloud), designed for instruction-following tasks that combine advanced text generation with visual understanding. It serves as a high-end open-weight model for developers and researchers building multimodal AI systems that require strong reasoning, perception, and long-context capabilities.

The model supports interleaved text and image inputs, very long context windows (up to roughly 256K tokens), and efficient inference through a mixture-of-experts architecture with about 22B active parameters out of 235B total. In today’s landscape, it competes with top-tier proprietary vision-language models while offering the advantages of open weights and flexible deployment. Typical applications include multimodal assistants, document and image analysis, visual reasoning, and large-context instruction-based workflows.