Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on Vision Evals
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 60.9% to 43.5%.
Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro averages 67.9% (#9 of 16) against 66.4% (#10 of 16) for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is cheaper ($0.0007 vs $0.0036 per sample), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is faster (4.7s vs 8.2s per sample).
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Comparison Table
Evals updated July 10, 2026Pricing updated July 21, 2026
| Property | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 256K |
| Parameters | 235B | |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.25 | $0.210 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $1.90 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Classification | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks | ||
| Overall | 67.9% | 66.4% |
| Object Detection | 26.4% | 42.3% |
| Counting | 52.7% | 47.3% |
| Identification | 93.8% | 90.6% |
| OCR | 88.8% | 88.1% |
| Data Extraction | 84.5% | 86.6% |
| Reasoning | 60.9% | 43.5% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0036 | $0.0007 |
| Avg speed / sample | 4.7s | 8.2s |
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: Overview
Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.
Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is a flagship multimodal vision-language model developed by Qwen (Alibaba Cloud), designed for instruction-following tasks that combine advanced text generation with visual understanding. It serves as a high-end open-weight model for developers and researchers building multimodal AI systems that require strong reasoning, perception, and long-context capabilities.
The model supports interleaved text and image inputs, very long context windows (up to roughly 256K tokens), and efficient inference through a mixture-of-experts architecture with about 22B active parameters out of 235B total. In today’s landscape, it competes with top-tier proprietary vision-language models while offering the advantages of open weights and flexible deployment. Typical applications include multimodal assistants, document and image analysis, visual reasoning, and large-context instruction-based workflows.