Roboflow

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM 5V Turbo

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and GLM 5V Turbo side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM 5V Turbo live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.
Z.aiGLM 5V Turbo
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM 5V Turbo on Vision Evals

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GLM 5V Turbo leads 56.5% to 33.9%.

Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro averages 66.0% (#23 of 33) against 65.3% (#25 of 33) for GLM 5V Turbo.

GLM 5V Turbo is cheaper ($0.0031 vs $0.0050 per sample), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is faster (6.1s vs 6.3s per sample).

Gemini 2.5 ProGLM 5V Turbo

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM 5V Turbo Comparison Table

Evals updated August 26, 2026Pricing updated August 26, 2026

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGLM 5V Turbo
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Apr 2026
Context Window1.0M200K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.25$1.20
Output $/1M$10.00$4.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
66.0%
65.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.0050$0.0031
Avg speed / sample6.11s6.35s
By task
Object Detection
33.9%
$0.010
56.5%
$0.0052
Counting
52.7%
$0.0012
48.6%
$0.0017
Identification
93.8%
$0.0012
84.4%
$0.0015
OCR
88.8%
$0.0047
89.3%
$0.0030
Data Extraction
84.5%
$0.0013
81.4%
$0.0018
Reasoning (low)
42.4%
$0.0013
31.8%
$0.0017
Reasoning (high)
62.3%
$0.011
49.7%
$0.0069

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM 5V Turbo: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

GLM 5V Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is a native multimodal model from Z.ai that extends the GLM family with joint image, video, and text input aimed at vision-centered coding and agent workflows. The model reads screenshots, design drafts, document layouts, and interface captures and generates runnable code from them, covering tasks such as turning a visual design into a working front end, diagnosing rendering and layout defects from screen captures, and operating graphical user interfaces during long-horizon agent runs. It accepts roughly 200,000 input tokens and can emit up to 131,072 output tokens in a single response, which supports sessions that hold specifications, source files, logs, and visual references at the same time.

Training includes a joint reinforcement learning stage spanning more than 30 tasks simultaneously, an approach Z.ai describes as a way to counter the trade-off in which improving visual recognition degrades programming ability and the reverse. Reported evaluations cover pure-text coding on the backend, frontend, and repository exploration tracks of CC-Bench-V2, together with agent execution suites such as PinchBench, ClawEval, and ZClawBench, indicating that text coding behavior is retained after visual input is added.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 2.5 Pro performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 66.0% (#23 of 33) against 65.3% (#25 of 33) for GLM 5V Turbo. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, GLM 5V Turbo leads with 56.5% against 33.9%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GLM 5V Turbo is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0031 per sample against $0.0050. Gemini 2.5 Pro is priced at $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output; GLM 5V Turbo is priced at $1.20 per 1M input tokens and $4.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 6.1s per inference against 6.3s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.